World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederic Sacher

Frederic Sacher

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
45221
World Ranking
6995
National Ranking
214

Frederic Sacher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic Sacher sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 794 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frederic Sacher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic Sacher sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederic Sacher is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France and specializes in medical research with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their scholarly output encompasses a substantial body of work across several related subfields, reflecting extensive engagement with cardiology, electrophysiology, imaging, molecular biology, epidemiology, and surgery.

Sacher's research primarily explores cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, cardiovascular effects of exercise, ECG monitoring and analysis, and ion channel regulation and function.

Their notable recent publications include the following:

  • 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (2024, EP Europace)
  • Pulsed field ablation selectively spares the oesophagus during pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (2021, EP Europace)
  • Marshall bundle elimination, Pulmonary vein isolation, and Line completion for ANatomical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Prospective, single-center study (2020, Heart Rhythm)
  • Does Timing of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Affect Prognosis in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator? Results From the Multicenter Randomized PARTITA Trial (2022, Circulation)
  • Epicardial course of the septopulmonary bundle: Anatomical considerations and clinical implications for roof line completion (2020, Heart Rhythm)

Sacher frequently collaborates with several prominent researchers in their field, including Pierre Jaḯs, Josselin Duchâteau, Mélèze Hocini, Michel Haïssaguerre, and Nicolas Derval.

The primary venues where Sacher's research is published reflect their concentration in cardiology and electrophysiology, with frequent contributions to journals such as:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • EP Europace
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

With over 500 publications in medicine, and nearly 500 focused on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, Sacher's academic efforts reveal a sustained commitment to advancing the understanding and treatment of heart rhythm disorders.

Best Publications

  • Sudden Cardiac Arrest Associated with Early Repolarization

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Nicolas Derval;Frederic Sacher;Laurence Jesel

  • Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure.

    Li-Fern Hsu;Pierre Jaïs;Prashanthan Sanders;Stéphane Garrigue

  • Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: The A4 Study

    Pierre Jaïs;Bruno Cauchemez;Laurent Macle;Emile Daoud

  • Spectral Analysis Identifies Sites of High-Frequency Activity Maintaining Atrial Fibrillation in Humans

    Prashanthan Sanders;Omer Berenfeld;Mélèze Hocini;Pierre Jaïs

  • 2019 ESC Guidelines for themanagement of patients with supraventricular tachycardia

    Josep Brugada;Demosthenes G Katritsis;Elena Arbelo;Fernando Arribas

  • Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Are Results Maintained at 5 Years of Follow-Up?

    Rukshen Weerasooriya;Paul Khairy;Jean Litalien;Laurent Macle

  • Long-Term Prognosis of Patients Diagnosed With Brugada Syndrome Results From the FINGER Brugada Syndrome Registry

    V. Probst;C. Veltmann;L. Eckardt;P.G. Meregalli

  • Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Mélèze Hocini;Prashanthan Sanders;Frederic Sacher

  • Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: critical structures for termination.

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Prashanthan Sanders;Mélèze Hocini;Yoshihide Takahashi

  • Driver Domains in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

    Michel Haissaguerre;Meleze Hocini;Arnaud Denis;Ashok J. Shah

  • J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

    Charles Antzelevitch;Gan Xin Yan;Michael J. Ackerman;Martin Borggrefe

  • Elimination of Local Abnormal Ventricular Activities: A New End Point for Substrate Modification in Patients with Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

    Pierre Jaïs;Philippe Maury;Paul Khairy;Frédéric Sacher

  • Outcome After Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Brugada Syndrome A Multicenter Study

    Frédéric Sacher;Vincent Probst;Yoshito Iesaka;Peggy Jacon

  • Techniques, Evaluation, and Consequences of Linear Block at the Left Atrial Roof in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation A Prospective Randomized Study

    Mélèze Hocini;Pierre Jaïs;Prashanthan Sanders;Yoshihide Takahashi

  • Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: characterization and outcome in a multicenter study.

    Frédéric Sacher;Kristi H. Monahan;Stuart P. Thomas;Neil Davidson

  • EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias

    Christian Torp Pedersen;G. Neal Kay;Jonathan Kalman;Martin Borggrefe

  • Epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation a multicenter safety study.

    Frédéric Sacher;Kurt Roberts-Thomson;Philippe Maury;Usha Tedrow

  • Flecainide therapy reduces exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

    Christian van der Werf;Prince J. Kannankeril;Frederic Sacher;Andrew D. Krahn

  • Characteristics of Recurrent Ventricular Fibrillation Associated With Inferolateral Early Repolarization: Role of Drug Therapy

    Michel Haissaguerre;Frederic Sacher;Akihiko Nogami;Nohiriro Komiya

  • Long-term follow-up of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation using termination as a procedural endpoint

    Mark D O'Neill;Matthew Wright;Sébastien Knecht;Pierre Jaïs

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Haïssaguerre
Michel Haïssaguerre University of Bordeaux
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux
Mélèze Hocini
Mélèze Hocini University of Bordeaux
Jacques Clémenty
Jacques Clémenty University of Bordeaux
Prashanthan Sanders
Prashanthan Sanders University of Adelaide
Laurent Fauchier
Laurent Fauchier François Rabelais University
Arthur A.M. Wilde
Arthur A.M. Wilde University of Amsterdam
Richard Redon
Richard Redon University of Nantes
Maxime Sermesant
Maxime Sermesant Université Côte d'Azur
Elijah R. Behr
Elijah R. Behr St George's, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary career pathways in healthcare can open new doors for students considering Medicine in the USA. There are many accredited programs available online, which offer flexibility and accessibility, especially for those seeking to enter the workforce quickly or balance other commitments.

For individuals interested in the business and administrative side of healthcare, options such as online medical billing and coding with financial aid make it easier to get started without significant upfront costs. Additionally, those looking to join the nursing profession may find lpn school without teas test requirements, helping to speed up the process and remove common barriers.

Those aiming for administrative leadership can consider a healthcare administration online degree and take advantage of accelerated pathways. Finally, experienced registered nurses aspiring to become nurse practitioners can benefit from rn to np bridge programs, which fast-track career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Frederic Sacher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles