World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mélèze Hocini

Mélèze Hocini

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 117 4166 3903 122 113 745 58650

Mélèze Hocini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mélèze Hocini between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mélèze Hocini published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 25.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2021. 18 of the 787 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2021. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 28 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 52 publications 2006: 35 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 41 publications 2019: 47 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 55 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

787 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mélèze Hocini: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 5
1998 7
1999 6
2000 28
2001 6
2002 19
2003 21
2004 22
2005 52
2006 35
2007 24
2008 33
2009 31
2010 28
2011 33
2012 26
2013 28
2014 32
2015 37
2016 26
2017 34
2018 41
2019 47
2020 29
2021 55
2022 22
2023 23
2024 17
2025 17
2026 1
Total 787
Download as CSV

Mélèze Hocini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mélèze Hocini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 745 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 745
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mélèze Hocini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mélèze Hocini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 116–117 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318 117
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mélèze Hocini is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France and has a substantial record of research in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans over 378 publications in Medicine, including 360 within Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, as well as research contributions to Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Surgery.

Their research topics emphasize various aspects of cardiac health and electrophysiology, particularly involving:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Ion channel regulation and function

Mélèze Hocini has contributed to several notable papers, including:

  • 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death, 2022, European Heart Journal
  • 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation, 2024, EP Europace
  • 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation, 2024, Heart Rhythm
  • Marshall bundle elimination, Pulmonary vein isolation, and Line completion for ANatomical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Prospective, single-center study, 2020, Heart Rhythm
  • Epicardial course of the septopulmonary bundle: Anatomical considerations and clinical implications for roof line completion, 2020, Heart Rhythm

The main journals and venues in which Mélèze Hocini frequently publishes include:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • EP Europace
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Mélèze Hocini collaborates extensively with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include Michel Haïssaguerre, Pierre Jaïs, Frédéric Sacher, Josselin Duchâteau, and Nicolas Derval, each with numerous joint publications reflecting ongoing collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Sudden Cardiac Arrest Associated with Early Repolarization

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Nicolas Derval;Frederic Sacher;Laurence Jesel

  • A Focal Source of Atrial Fibrillation Treated by Discrete Radiofrequency Ablation

    P Jaïs;M Haïssaguerre;D C Shah;S Chouairi

  • Electrophysiological End Point for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Initiated From Multiple Pulmonary Venous Foci

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Pierre Jaïs;Dipen C. Shah;Stéphane Garrigue

  • Electrophysiological Breakthroughs From the Left Atrium to the Pulmonary Veins

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Dipen C. Shah;Pierre Jaïs;Mélèze Hocini

  • Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure.

    Li-Fern Hsu;Pierre Jaïs;Prashanthan Sanders;Stéphane Garrigue

  • Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: The A4 Study

    Pierre Jaïs;Bruno Cauchemez;Laurent Macle;Emile Daoud

  • Spectral Analysis Identifies Sites of High-Frequency Activity Maintaining Atrial Fibrillation in Humans

    Prashanthan Sanders;Omer Berenfeld;Mélèze Hocini;Pierre Jaïs

  • Right and Left Atrial Radiofrequency Catheter Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

    M Haïssaguerre;P Jaïs;D C Shah;L Gencel

  • Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Are Results Maintained at 5 Years of Follow-Up?

    Rukshen Weerasooriya;Paul Khairy;Jean Litalien;Laurent Macle

  • Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Mélèze Hocini;Prashanthan Sanders;Frederic Sacher

  • Technique and Results of Linear Ablation at the Mitral Isthmus

    Pierre Jaïs;Mélèze Hocini;Li-Fern Hsu;Prashanthan Sanders

  • Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: critical structures for termination.

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Prashanthan Sanders;Mélèze Hocini;Yoshihide Takahashi

  • Mapping and Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Morio Shoda;Pierre Jaïs;Akihiko Nogami

  • Driver Domains in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

    Michel Haissaguerre;Meleze Hocini;Arnaud Denis;Ashok J. Shah

  • Elimination of Local Abnormal Ventricular Activities: A New End Point for Substrate Modification in Patients with Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

    Pierre Jaïs;Philippe Maury;Paul Khairy;Frédéric Sacher

  • Outcome After Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Brugada Syndrome A Multicenter Study

    Frédéric Sacher;Vincent Probst;Yoshito Iesaka;Peggy Jacon

  • Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Fibrillation Associated With Long-QT and Brugada Syndromes

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Fabrice Extramiana;Mélèze Hocini;Bruno Cauchemez

  • Changes in Atrial Fibrillation Cycle Length and Inducibility During Catheter Ablation and Their Relation to Outcome

    Michel Haïssaguerre;Prashanthan Sanders;Mélèze Hocini;Li-Fern Hsu

  • Techniques, Evaluation, and Consequences of Linear Block at the Left Atrial Roof in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation A Prospective Randomized Study

    Mélèze Hocini;Pierre Jaïs;Prashanthan Sanders;Yoshihide Takahashi

  • Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: characterization and outcome in a multicenter study.

    Frédéric Sacher;Kristi H. Monahan;Stuart P. Thomas;Neil Davidson

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Haïssaguerre
Michel Haïssaguerre University of Bordeaux
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux
Frederic Sacher
Frederic Sacher University of Bordeaux
Jacques Clémenty
Jacques Clémenty University of Bordeaux
Prashanthan Sanders
Prashanthan Sanders University of Adelaide
Maxime Sermesant
Maxime Sermesant Université Côte d'Azur
George Klein
George Klein Karolinska Institute
Paul Khairy
Paul Khairy Montreal Heart Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare education options can open many rewarding career pathways. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding online courses can provide a quick entry point to in-demand roles supporting hospitals and clinics.

If your goals include direct patient care, many choose to become registered nurses through nursing school online. These flexible programs allow students to balance study with work and family life, and they are often more affordable than traditional campus-based options.

For nurses ready to take on advanced practice roles, there are online nurse practitioner programs that prepare graduates for leadership, specialized care, and higher earning potential. Those interested in academia or shaping the future of healthcare education may consider online doctoral options, such as a doctorate in nursing education online programs.

These alternatives offer flexible, reputable, and often more affordable ways to build a fulfilling healthcare career outside the traditional path to an MD.

Best Scientists Citing Mélèze Hocini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles