World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10349 9715 415 392 631 39357

Paul Khairy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Khairy between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Khairy published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 26.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2013. 44 of the 714 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2013. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 44 publications 2012: 48 publications 2013: 58 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 43 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 42 publications 2025: 41 publications 2026: 3 publications
2000 2026

714 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Khairy: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 5
2002 3
2003 5
2004 9
2005 6
2006 15
2007 14
2008 27
2009 21
2010 24
2011 44
2012 48
2013 58
2014 39
2015 33
2016 30
2017 33
2018 29
2019 39
2020 37
2021 42
2022 43
2023 23
2024 42
2025 41
2026 3
Total 714
Download as CSV

Paul Khairy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Khairy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 631 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 631
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Khairy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Khairy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Khairy is affiliated with the Montreal Heart Institute in Canada and has published extensively in the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics related to heart health and treatment.

Their publications include studies and guidelines related to atrial fibrillation, cardiac arrhythmias, and congenital heart disease, among other subjects. Recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul Khairy include:

  • The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Safety of the oral factor XIa inhibitor asundexian compared with apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (PACIFIC-AF): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-finding phase 2 study, 2022, The Lancet
  • Procedure-Related Complications of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Atrial septal defect in adulthood: a new paradigm for congenital heart disease, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • A new prediction model for ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, 2022, European Heart Journal

Paul Khairy frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Laurent Macle, Blandine Mondésert, Shelby Kutty, Philip Moons, and Koen Luyckx. These collaborations contribute to a wide range of studies in cardiology and related fields.

The scientist's work is often published in prominent venues such as:

  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Within the broader category of medicine, Paul Khairy specializes in various subfields, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies

Best Publications

  • 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    Karen K. Stout;Curt J. Daniels;Jamil A. Aboulhosn;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Long-Term Survival, Modes of Death, and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Fontan Surgery

    Paul Khairy;Susan M. Fernandes;John E. Mayer;John K. Triedman

  • The Clinical Profile and Pathophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation Relationships Among Clinical Features, Epidemiology, and Mechanisms

    Jason Andrade;Paul Khairy;Dobromir Dobrev;Stanley Nattel

  • Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: The A4 Study

    Pierre Jaïs;Bruno Cauchemez;Laurent Macle;Emile Daoud

  • Changing mortality in congenital heart disease.

    Paul Khairy;Raluca Ionescu-Ittu;Andrew S. Mackie;Michal Abrahamowicz

  • Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Are Results Maintained at 5 Years of Follow-Up?

    Rukshen Weerasooriya;Paul Khairy;Jean Litalien;Laurent Macle

  • 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease [Clinical Practice Guideline]

    Karen K. Stout;Curt J. Daniels;Jamil A. Aboulhosn;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Tetralogy of Fallot

    Paul Khairy;Louise Harris;Michael J. Landzberg;Sangeetha Viswanathan

  • Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation.

    Paul Khairy;Patrick Chauvet;John Lehmann;Jean Lambert

  • Elimination of Local Abnormal Ventricular Activities: A New End Point for Substrate Modification in Patients with Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

    Pierre Jaïs;Philippe Maury;Paul Khairy;Frédéric Sacher

  • Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Congenital Heart Disease

    Paul Khairy;David W. Ouyang;Susan M. Fernandes;Aviva Lee-Parritz

  • Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and presumed paradoxical thromboemboli: a systematic review.

    Paul Khairy;Clare P O'Donnell;Michael J Landzberg

  • Value of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation After Tetralogy of Fallot Repair A Multicenter Study

    Paul Khairy;Michael J. Landzberg;Michael A. Gatzoulis;Hugues Lucron

  • Arrhythmia Burden in Adults With Surgically Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot A Multi-Institutional Study

    Paul Khairy;Paul Khairy;Jamil Aboulhosn;Michelle Z. Gurvitz;Alexander R. Opotowsky

  • Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review of published studies

    Jason G. Andrade;Paul Khairy;Peter G. Guerra;Marc W. Deyell

  • Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Assessed by Continuous Monitoring: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Jason G. Andrade;Jason G. Andrade;Jean Champagne;Marc Dubuc;Marc W. Deyell

  • Cardiovascular Outcomes After the Arterial Switch Operation for D-Transposition of the Great Arteries

    Paul Khairy;Mathieu Clair;Susan M. Fernandes;Elizabeth D. Blume

  • PACES/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Recognition and Management of Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Executive Summary

    Paul Khairy;George F. Van Hare;Seshadri Balaji;Charles I. Berul

  • Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation.

    Anita W Asgar;Paul Khairy

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Talajic
Mario Talajic Montreal Heart Institute
Koen Luyckx
Koen Luyckx KU Leuven
Stanley Nattel
Stanley Nattel Montreal Heart Institute
Michael J. Landzberg
Michael J. Landzberg Brigham and Women's Hospital
Bengt Johansson
Bengt Johansson Technical University of Denmark
Jean-Claude Tardif
Jean-Claude Tardif Montreal Heart Institute
Paul Dorian
Paul Dorian University of Toronto
Carole A. Warnes
Carole A. Warnes Mayo Clinic
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux
Gary D. Webb
Gary D. Webb Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing medicine or healthcare careers in the USA, online degrees offer flexible routes to advance your education and skills. One growing option for registered nurses is bridging from ADN to a nurse practitioner through adn to np programs online. These programs allow working RNs to further their qualifications and step into advanced practice roles.

If you’re passionate about preventive health, nutrition degrees online offer a path toward careers in dietetics, wellness education, or public health.

For those seeking leadership roles, you might wonder, whats the best online mha program for working adults? Accredited online Master of Healthcare Administration programs can help busy professionals advance without putting their careers on pause.

Additionally, many nurses ask, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Some online RN to BSN programs are designed with minimal or no required clinical hours, making it easier for nurses to upskill on their own schedule.

These online pathways provide flexible solutions for those seeking diverse roles across the evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Khairy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles