World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
39357
World Ranking
10350
National Ranking
415

Paul Khairy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Khairy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 631 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul Khairy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Khairy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Khairy is affiliated with the Montreal Heart Institute in Canada and has published extensively in the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics related to heart health and treatment.

Their publications include studies and guidelines related to atrial fibrillation, cardiac arrhythmias, and congenital heart disease, among other subjects. Recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul Khairy include:

  • The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Safety of the oral factor XIa inhibitor asundexian compared with apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (PACIFIC-AF): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-finding phase 2 study, 2022, The Lancet
  • Procedure-Related Complications of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Atrial septal defect in adulthood: a new paradigm for congenital heart disease, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • A new prediction model for ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, 2022, European Heart Journal

Paul Khairy frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Laurent Macle, Blandine Mondésert, Shelby Kutty, Philip Moons, and Koen Luyckx. These collaborations contribute to a wide range of studies in cardiology and related fields.

The scientist's work is often published in prominent venues such as:

  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Within the broader category of medicine, Paul Khairy specializes in various subfields, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies

Best Publications

  • 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    Karen K. Stout;Curt J. Daniels;Jamil A. Aboulhosn;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Long-Term Survival, Modes of Death, and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Fontan Surgery

    Paul Khairy;Susan M. Fernandes;John E. Mayer;John K. Triedman

  • The Clinical Profile and Pathophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation Relationships Among Clinical Features, Epidemiology, and Mechanisms

    Jason Andrade;Paul Khairy;Dobromir Dobrev;Stanley Nattel

  • Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: The A4 Study

    Pierre Jaïs;Bruno Cauchemez;Laurent Macle;Emile Daoud

  • Changing mortality in congenital heart disease.

    Paul Khairy;Raluca Ionescu-Ittu;Andrew S. Mackie;Michal Abrahamowicz

  • Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Are Results Maintained at 5 Years of Follow-Up?

    Rukshen Weerasooriya;Paul Khairy;Jean Litalien;Laurent Macle

  • 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease [Clinical Practice Guideline]

    Karen K. Stout;Curt J. Daniels;Jamil A. Aboulhosn;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Tetralogy of Fallot

    Paul Khairy;Louise Harris;Michael J. Landzberg;Sangeetha Viswanathan

  • Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation.

    Paul Khairy;Patrick Chauvet;John Lehmann;Jean Lambert

  • Elimination of Local Abnormal Ventricular Activities: A New End Point for Substrate Modification in Patients with Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

    Pierre Jaïs;Philippe Maury;Paul Khairy;Frédéric Sacher

  • Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Congenital Heart Disease

    Paul Khairy;David W. Ouyang;Susan M. Fernandes;Aviva Lee-Parritz

  • Transcatheter closure versus medical therapy of patent foramen ovale and presumed paradoxical thromboemboli: a systematic review.

    Paul Khairy;Clare P O'Donnell;Michael J Landzberg

  • Value of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation After Tetralogy of Fallot Repair A Multicenter Study

    Paul Khairy;Michael J. Landzberg;Michael A. Gatzoulis;Hugues Lucron

  • Arrhythmia Burden in Adults With Surgically Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot A Multi-Institutional Study

    Paul Khairy;Paul Khairy;Jamil Aboulhosn;Michelle Z. Gurvitz;Alexander R. Opotowsky

  • Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review of published studies

    Jason G. Andrade;Paul Khairy;Peter G. Guerra;Marc W. Deyell

  • The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

    Jason G. Andrade;Jason G. Andrade;Martin Aguilar;Clare Atzema;Alan Bell

  • Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Assessed by Continuous Monitoring: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Jason G. Andrade;Jason G. Andrade;Jean Champagne;Marc Dubuc;Marc W. Deyell

  • Cardiovascular Outcomes After the Arterial Switch Operation for D-Transposition of the Great Arteries

    Paul Khairy;Mathieu Clair;Susan M. Fernandes;Elizabeth D. Blume

  • PACES/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Recognition and Management of Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Executive Summary

    Paul Khairy;George F. Van Hare;Seshadri Balaji;Charles I. Berul

  • Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation.

    Anita W Asgar;Paul Khairy

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Talajic
Mario Talajic Montreal Heart Institute
Koen Luyckx
Koen Luyckx KU Leuven
Stanley Nattel
Stanley Nattel Montreal Heart Institute
Michael J. Landzberg
Michael J. Landzberg Brigham and Women's Hospital
Bengt Johansson
Bengt Johansson Technical University of Denmark
Jean-Claude Tardif
Jean-Claude Tardif Montreal Heart Institute
Paul Dorian
Paul Dorian University of Toronto
Carole A. Warnes
Carole A. Warnes Mayo Clinic
Pierre Jaïs
Pierre Jaïs University of Bordeaux
Gary D. Webb
Gary D. Webb Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing medicine or healthcare careers in the USA, online degrees offer flexible routes to advance your education and skills. One growing option for registered nurses is bridging from ADN to a nurse practitioner through adn to np programs online. These programs allow working RNs to further their qualifications and step into advanced practice roles.

If you’re passionate about preventive health, nutrition degrees online offer a path toward careers in dietetics, wellness education, or public health.

For those seeking leadership roles, you might wonder, whats the best online mha program for working adults? Accredited online Master of Healthcare Administration programs can help busy professionals advance without putting their careers on pause.

Additionally, many nurses ask, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Some online RN to BSN programs are designed with minimal or no required clinical hours, making it easier for nurses to upskill on their own schedule.

These online pathways provide flexible solutions for those seeking diverse roles across the evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Khairy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles