World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Barbara J.M. Mulder

Barbara J.M. Mulder

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
48253
World Ranking
7242
National Ranking
273

Barbara J.M. Mulder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J.M. Mulder sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 695 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Barbara J.M. Mulder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J.M. Mulder sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara J.M. Mulder is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily within the field of Medicine, with 194 publications. A significant portion of their work lies in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, accounting for 73 publications. Additional subfields include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Genetics, and Surgery.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics related to cardiovascular health and disorders. Key main topics include:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Barbara J.M. Mulder has published extensively in several prominent journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • European Heart Journal (13 publications)
  • International Journal of Cardiology (5 publications)
  • International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease (5 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (3 publications)
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology (3 publications)

Among their recent papers are:

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Angiotensin receptor blockers and β blockers in Marfan syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials, 2022, The Lancet
  • Improved Outcomes After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 Guidelines for Cardiovascular Interventions in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease, 2022, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Long-term clinical outcomes of losartan in patients with Marfan syndrome: follow-up of the multicentre randomized controlled COMPARE trial, 2020, European Heart Journal

Barbara J.M. Mulder frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Berto J. Bouma (39 coauthored publications)
  • Maarten Groenink (16 coauthored publications)
  • Folkert J. Meijboom (13 coauthored publications)
  • Hubert W. Vliegen (13 coauthored publications)
  • Arie P.J. van Dijk (13 coauthored publications)

Best Publications

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis

    Gilbert Habib;Patrizio Lancellotti;Manuel J. Antunes;Maria Grazia Bongiorni

  • ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010).

    Helmut Baumgartner;Philipp Bonhoeffer;Natasja M. S. De Groot;Fokko de Haan

  • Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection

    R. Erbel;F. Alfonso;C. Boileau;O. Dirsch

  • ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Vera Regitz-Zagrosek;Carina Blomstrom Lundqvist;Claudio Borghi;Renata Cifkova

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease.

    Helmut Baumgartner;Julie De Backer;Sonya V Babu-Narayan;Werner Budts

  • The changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease

    Teun van der Bom;A. Carla Zomer;Aeilko H. Zwinderman;Folkert J. Meijboom

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease

    Helmut Baumgartner;Julie De Backer;Sonya V. Babu-Narayan;Werner Budts

  • Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease

    Willem Drenthen;Eric Boersma;Ali Balci;Philip Moons

  • Outcome of Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease: A Literature Review

    Willem Drenthen;Petronella G. Pieper;Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink;Willem A. van Lottum

  • Preoperative Thresholds for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Corrected Tetralogy of Fallot Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    Thomas Oosterhof;Alexander van Straten;Hubert W. Vliegen;Folkert J. Meijboom

  • Mortality in adult congenital heart disease

    Carianne L. Verheugt;Carianne L. Verheugt;Cuno S. P. M. Uiterwaal;Enno T. van der Velde;Folkert J. Meijboom

  • The spectrum of adult congenital heart disease in Europe: morbidity and mortality in a 5 year follow-up period. The Euro Heart Survey on adult congenital heart disease.

    Peter Engelfriet;Eric Boersma;Erwin Oechslin;Jan Tijssen

  • Pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults born with a heart septal defect: the Euro Heart Survey on adult congenital heart disease

    Peter M Engelfriet;Marielle G J Duffels;Thomas Möller;Eric Boersma

  • Losartan reduces aortic dilatation rate in adults with Marfan syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

    Maarten Groenink;Alexander W. den Hartog;Romy Franken;Teodora Radonic

  • Psychological and cognitive functioning in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease: a meta-analysis.

    Petra A Karsdorp;Walter Everaerd;Merel Kindt;Barbara J M Mulder

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis

    Gilbert Habib;Patrizio Lancellotti;Manuel J. Antunes;Maria Grazia Bongiorni

  • Sudden Cardiac Death in Adult Congenital Heart Disease

    Zeliha Koyak;Louise Harris;Joris R. de Groot;Candice K. Silversides

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis. The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Habib G;Lancellotti P;Antunes Mj;Bongiorni Mg

  • ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010)

    Helmut Baumgartner;Philipp Bonhoeffer;Natasja M.S. de Groo;Fokko de Haan

  • 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis

    Gilbert Habib;Patrizio Lancellotti;Manuel J. Antunes;Maria Grazia Bongiorni

Frequent Co-Authors

Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink
Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen University Medical Center Groningen
Michael A. Gatzoulis
Michael A. Gatzoulis Imperial College London
Aeilko H. Zwinderman
Aeilko H. Zwinderman University of Amsterdam
Jan G.P. Tijssen
Jan G.P. Tijssen University of Amsterdam
Robbert J. de Winter
Robbert J. de Winter University of Amsterdam
Ernst E. van der Wall
Ernst E. van der Wall University Medical Center Utrecht
Diederick E. Grobbee
Diederick E. Grobbee Utrecht University
Isabelle C. Van Gelder
Isabelle C. Van Gelder University Medical Center Groningen
Bernard Keavney
Bernard Keavney University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While pursuing a traditional medical degree in the USA is rewarding, there are several alternative and complementary online pathways in healthcare to consider. Advanced online degrees can offer greater flexibility for working professionals or those looking to upskill without putting their career on hold.

For those interested in healthcare management, the best online mha programs provide options to earn a CAHME-accredited Master of Healthcare Administration, preparing graduates for leadership roles in hospitals and clinics.

Nursing professionals seeking to advance their credentials without extensive in-person requirements can benefit from rn to bsn no clinical hours programs. These streamlined degrees are ideal for RNs wanting to gain a BSN and expand their career prospects.

Speed and convenience are also priorities for those eyeing higher nursing qualifications. If you want to move quickly from an MSN to the doctoral level, the fastest msn to dnp program provides an accelerated pathway. Alternatively, working nurses may prefer programs that are less intense with the easiest dnp programs designed for flexibility and manageable workloads.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara J.M. Mulder

Trending Scientists