World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 127 2816 2627 107 105 949 63376

Ernst E. van der Wall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ernst E. van der Wall between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ernst E. van der Wall published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 20.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 76 publications in 2009. 1 of the 951 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 76. Peak 76 publications in 2009. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 35 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 29 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 30 publications 2003: 47 publications 2004: 63 publications 2005: 68 publications 2006: 75 publications 2007: 63 publications 2008: 74 publications 2009: 76 publications 2010: 73 publications 2011: 58 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

951 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ernst E. van der Wall: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 3
1983 1
1984 2
1985 6
1986 2
1987 0
1988 7
1989 5
1990 10
1991 11
1992 35
1993 13
1994 6
1995 10
1996 29
1997 17
1998 12
1999 13
2000 17
2001 19
2002 30
2003 47
2004 63
2005 68
2006 75
2007 63
2008 74
2009 76
2010 73
2011 58
2012 34
2013 21
2014 20
2015 17
2016 11
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 951
Download as CSV

Ernst E. van der Wall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst E. van der Wall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 941–960 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 949 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133 949
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ernst E. van der Wall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst E. van der Wall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 127
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Ernst E. van der Wall is affiliated with the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands and has a significant body of work primarily in the field of Medicine.

Their research focuses on the subfields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine; Biomedical Engineering; Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics; and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. A prominent area of study includes advanced MRI techniques applied to cardiovascular diagnostics and imaging.

Key topics covered in their work include:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Ernst E. van der Wall has contributed numerous publications across various scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Among recent notable papers authored or co-authored are:

  • "4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update" (2023), Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes" (2020), JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a Consensus Statement from the Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Study Group" (2023), Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • "Imaging of Clinically Unrecognized Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease" (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "5D Flow MRI: A Fully Self-gated, Free-running Framework for Cardiac and Respiratory Motion-resolved 3D Hemodynamics" (2020), Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging

Their research activity includes collaboration with frequent co-authors such as:

  • Jérôme Yerly
  • Christopher Roy
  • Aurélien Bustin
  • Davide Piccini
  • Hubert Cochet

In 2004, Ernst E. van der Wall was recognized by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Gilles Montalescot;Udo Sechtem;Stephan Achenbach;Felicita Andreotti

  • Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

    Kristian Thygesen;Joseph S. Alpert;Harvey D. White;Allan S. Jaffe

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Jeroen J. Bax;Gabe B. Bleeker;Thomas H. Marwick;Sander G. Molhoek

  • Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling but Not Clinical Improvement Predicts Long-Term Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

    Cheuk Man Yu;Gabe B. Bleeker;Jeffrey Wing Hong Fung;Martin J. Schalij

  • Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Theodorus A.M. Kaandorp;Hildo J. Lamb;Eric Boersma

  • Noninvasive Evaluation of the Aortic Root With Multislice Computed Tomography : Implications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Laurens F. Tops;David A. Wood;Victoria Delgado;Joanne D. Schuijf

  • Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

    Gabija Pundziute;Joanne D. Schuijf;J. Wouter Jukema;Eric Boersma

  • Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with end-stage heart failure.

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Martin J. Schalij M.D.;Sander G. Molhoek;Harriette F. Verwey M.D.

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure before pacemaker implantation

    Jeroen J. Bax;Thomas H. Marwick;Sander G. Molhoek;Gabe B. Bleeker

  • Magnetic resonance imaging to assess the hemodynamic effects of pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of fallot.

    Hubert W. Vliegen;Alexander van Straten;Albert de Roos;Arno A.W. Roest

  • Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients

    Claudia Ypenburg;Martin J Schalij;Gabe B Bleeker;Paul Steendijk

  • Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation Assessed With 123-Iodine Metaiodobenzylguanidine Imaging Predicts Ventricular Arrhythmias in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients

    Mark J. Boogers;C. Jan Willem Borleffs;Maureen M. Henneman;Rutger J. van Bommel

  • Restrictive Annuloplasty and Coronary Revascularization in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Results in Reverse Left Ventricular Remodeling

    Jeroen J. Bax;Jerry Braun;Soeresh T. Somer;Robert Klautz

  • Can LV Dyssynchrony as Assessed with Phase Analysis on Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Predict Response to CRT

    Maureen M. Henneman;Ji Chen;Petra Dibbets-Schneider;Marcel P. Stokkel

  • Aortic stiffness and diameter predict progressive aortic dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome.

    Gijs J. Nollen;Maarten Groenink;Jan G.P. Tijssen;Ernst E. van der Wall

  • Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

    Jacob M. van Werkhoven;Joanne D. Schuijf;Oliver Gaemperli;J. Wouter Jukema

  • Risk factors for coronary heart disease: implications of gender.

    Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep;H Tineke Westerveld;D Willem Erkelens;Ernst E van der Wall

  • Clinical versus echocardiographic parameters to assess response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Jeroen J. Bax;Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung;Ernst E. van der Wall

  • Effect of total scar burden on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Claudia Ypenburg;Stijntje D. Roes;Gabe B. Bleeker;Theodorus A.M. Kaandorp

  • Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance Improves Angiographic and Clinical Outcome of Stent Implantation for Long Coronary Artery Stenoses Final Results of a Randomized Comparison With Angiographic Guidance (TULIP Study)

    Pranobe V. Oemrawsingh;Gary S. Mintz;Martin J. Schalij;Aeilko H. Zwinderman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
Martin J. Schalij
Martin J. Schalij Leiden University Medical Center
Albert de Roos
Albert de Roos Leiden University Medical Center
Paul Steendijk
Paul Steendijk Leiden University Medical Center
Hildo J. Lamb
Hildo J. Lamb Leiden University Medical Center
J. Wouter Jukema
J. Wouter Jukema Leiden University Medical Center
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Victoria Delgado
Victoria Delgado Leiden University Medical Center
Nina Ajmone Marsan
Nina Ajmone Marsan Leiden University Medical Center
Barbara J.M. Mulder
Barbara J.M. Mulder University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, there are a variety of online degree options and fast-track career pathways. Many healthcare professionals pursue advanced programs while working full-time, making flexibility and speed important considerations.

One popular option is the 1 year dnp program online, which allows registered nurses to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice in a condensed time frame. Similarly, those seeking to start their medical careers quickly may consider fast track medical programs, offering accelerated pathways to become Licensed Practical Nurses.

Mental health is another critical field. With an accelerated msn psychiatric np programs, nurses can specialize in psychiatric care and enter this in-demand specialty faster than traditional routes.

For those drawn to leadership or administrative careers in healthcare, cost is often a concern. Exploring the healthcare administration degree cost can help prospective students find quality options that fit their budget, opening doors to non-clinical roles in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Ernst E. van der Wall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles