World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
20238
World Ranking
19634
National Ranking
716

Paul Steendijk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Steendijk sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 378 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul Steendijk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Steendijk sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Steendijk is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands and specializes in medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research portfolio spans various subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, developmental and educational psychology, education, and surgery.

Their scientific work covers several main topics:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development

Steendijk's frequent collaborators include Alexander Schmeißer, Thomas Rauwolf, Thomas Groscheck, Ivan Tanev, and S Meissler, reflecting a collaborative approach in their research activities.

The researcher has published notably in venues such as the European Heart Journal, the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, BMC Medical Education, JACC Advances, and the Journal of Applied Physiology. These publication venues highlight Steendijk's engagement with both clinical and educational scientific communities.

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions and their physiological mechanisms. Examples include:

  • Pressure-volume loop validation of TAPSE/PASP for right ventricular arterial coupling in heart failure with pulmonary hypertension, published in 2020 in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Predictors and prognosis of right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension due to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, published in 2021 in ESC Heart Failure
  • CaMKII activity contributes to homeometric autoregulation of the heart: A novel mechanism for the Anrep effect, published in 2020 in The Journal of Physiology
  • What Were You Thinking? Medical Students' Metacognition and Perceptions of Self-Regulated Learning, published in 2021 in Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • Hemodynamic Assessment in Takotsubo Syndrome, published in 2023 in Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Steendijk's research includes topics on the mechanics of cardiac function, particularly the right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension, and extends to educational studies focusing on metacognition and self-regulated learning in medical education. This reflects a combination of clinical research and educational psychology within their scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Jeroen J. Bax;Gabe B. Bleeker;Thomas H. Marwick;Sander G. Molhoek

  • Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Theodorus A.M. Kaandorp;Hildo J. Lamb;Eric Boersma

  • Utility of Doppler Echocardiography and Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Estimation of Diastolic Function in Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction A Comparative Doppler-Conductance Catheterization Study

    Mario Kasner;Dirk Westermann;Paul Steendijk;Regina Gaub

  • Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with end-stage heart failure.

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Martin J. Schalij M.D.;Sander G. Molhoek;Harriette F. Verwey M.D.

  • Cardiac Inflammation Contributes to Changes in the Extracellular Matrix in Patients With Heart Failure and Normal Ejection Fraction

    Dirk Westermann;Diana Lindner;Mario Kasner;Christine Zietsch

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure before pacemaker implantation

    Jeroen J. Bax;Thomas H. Marwick;Sander G. Molhoek;Gabe B. Bleeker

  • Exenatide reduces infarct size and improves cardiac function in a porcine model of ischemia and reperfusion injury.

    Leo Timmers;José P.S. Henriques;Dominique P.V. de Kleijn;J. Hans DeVries

  • Role of left ventricular stiffness in heart failure with normal ejection fraction.

    Dirk Westermann;Mario Kasner;Paul Steendijk;Frank Spillmann

  • Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients

    Claudia Ypenburg;Martin J Schalij;Gabe B Bleeker;Paul Steendijk

  • Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of right ventricular pressure-volume loops - In vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension

    Titus Kuehne;Sevim Yilmaz;Paul Steendijk;Phillip Moore

  • Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Characterized by Dynamic Impairment of Active Relaxation and Contraction of the Left Ventricle on Exercise and Associated With Myocardial Energy Deficiency

    Thanh T. Phan;Khalid Abozguia;Ganesh Nallur Shivu;Gnanadevan Mahadevan

  • Optimizing Hemodynamics in Heart Failure Patients by Systematic Screening of Left Ventricular Pacing Sites : The Lateral Left Ventricular Wall and the Coronary Sinus Are Rarely the Best Sites

    Nicolas Derval;Paul Steendijk;Lorne J. Gula;Antoine Deplagne

  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a Narrow QRS Complex

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Eduard R. Holman;Paul Steendijk;Eric Boersma

  • Usefulness of myocardial tissue Doppler echocardiography to evaluate left ventricular dyssynchrony before and after biventricular pacing in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Sander G. Molhoek;Lieselot van Erven;Paul J. Voogd

  • Assessing right ventricular function: the role of echocardiography and complementary technologies

    G. B. Bleeker;P. Steendijk;E. R. Holman;C.-M. Yu

  • Comparison of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with sinus rhythm versus chronic atrial fibrillation

    Sander G. Molhoek;Jeroen J. Bax;Gabe B. Bleeker;Eric Boersma

  • Validation and reproducibility of aortic pulse wave velocity as assessed with velocity‐encoded MRI

    Heynric B. Grotenhuis;Jos J.M. Westenberg;Paul Steendijk;Rob J. van der Geest

  • QRS duration and shortening to predict clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure.

    Sander G. Molhoek;Jeroen J. Bax;Eric Boersma;Lieselot Van Erven

  • Right Atrial and Ventricular Adaptation to Chronic Right Ventricular Pressure Overload

    Sydney L. Gaynor;Hersh S. Maniar;Jeffrey B. Bloch;Paul Steendijk

  • Hemodynamic effects of long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis by pressure-volume loops.

    Paul Steendijk;Sven A. Tulner;Jeroen J. Bax;Pranobe V. Oemrawsingh

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin J. Schalij
Martin J. Schalij Leiden University Medical Center
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
Burkert Pieske
Burkert Pieske Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ernst E. van der Wall
Ernst E. van der Wall University Medical Center Utrecht
Frank van Bel
Frank van Bel Utrecht University
Albert de Roos
Albert de Roos Leiden University Medical Center
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Carsten Tschöpe
Carsten Tschöpe Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Heinz-Peter Schultheiss
Heinz-Peter Schultheiss Charité - University Medicine Berlin
J. Wouter Jukema
J. Wouter Jukema Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary pathways to a traditional MD can open doors to diverse healthcare careers. For registered nurses aiming to advance their roles, an rn to np bridge program offers a flexible solution to move from RN to Nurse Practitioner—often in less time than a traditional route.

For those interested in diet, wellness, or preventive care, a bachelor's in nutrition online can be a practical way to start a career in nutritional science, health coaching, or food policy.

If you see yourself in healthcare leadership, consider a cahme accredited mha online programs to gain management skills needed to lead hospitals, clinics, or health organizations.

Lastly, registered nurses looking for career progression without additional clinical requirements can explore rn to bsn programs no clinicals, paving the way for broader job opportunities and higher earning potential.

These online degrees offer flexibility and open valuable career pathways within the medical and healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Steendijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles