World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 134 2130 1982 79 78 1325 75764

Martin J. Schalij publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin J. Schalij between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin J. Schalij published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 35.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 115 publications in 2011. 4 of the 1,341 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 115. Peak 115 publications in 2011. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 39 publications 2004: 38 publications 2005: 62 publications 2006: 62 publications 2007: 65 publications 2008: 77 publications 2009: 100 publications 2010: 111 publications 2011: 115 publications 2012: 90 publications 2013: 87 publications 2014: 62 publications 2015: 50 publications 2016: 56 publications 2017: 67 publications 2018: 47 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1988 2025

1,341 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin J. Schalij: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 3
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 5
1997 5
1998 10
1999 3
2000 9
2001 6
2002 9
2003 39
2004 38
2005 62
2006 62
2007 65
2008 77
2009 100
2010 111
2011 115
2012 90
2013 87
2014 62
2015 50
2016 56
2017 67
2018 47
2019 42
2020 36
2021 40
2022 16
2023 16
2024 3
2025 1
Total 1,341
Download as CSV

Martin J. Schalij publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Schalij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,321–1,340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,325 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17 1,325
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin J. Schalij D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Schalij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 134–135 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163 134
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Martin J. Schalij is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research focus spans several domains within medicine, primarily centered on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Schalij's scientific contributions cover a variety of subjects, including cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, heart failure treatment and management, cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, acute myocardial infarction research, congenital heart disease studies, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, and cardiovascular function and risk factors.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

With a significant contribution to subfields, Schalij has worked extensively in:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Surgery

Frequent publication venues for Schalij include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Netherlands Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • IJC Heart & Vasculature

Collaborative efforts feature prominently in Schalij's work, with frequent co-authors such as:

  • Anastasia D. Egorova
  • Saskia L.M.A. Beeres
  • Monique R.M. Jongbloed
  • Philippine Kiès
  • J. Wouter Jukema

Recent notable papers include:

  • Effect of Smartphone-Enabled Health Monitoring Devices vs Regular Follow-up on Blood Pressure Control Among Patients After Myocardial Infarction, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of systemic right ventricular failure, 2021, Heart
  • Asymmetry and Heterogeneity: Part and Parcel in Cardiac Autonomic Innervation and Function, 2021, Frontiers in Physiology
  • Coronary anomalies in tetralogy of Fallot - A meta-analysis, 2020, International Journal of Cardiology
  • Normal and reference values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based pulse wave velocity in the middle-aged general population, 2021, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Best Publications

  • Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

    William Wijns;Philippe Kolh;Nicolas Danchin;Volkmar Falk

  • Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation

    A. John Camm;Paulus Kirchhof;Gregory Y H Lip;Ulrich Schotten

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Jeroen J. Bax;Gabe B. Bleeker;Thomas H. Marwick;Sander G. Molhoek

  • EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA).

    Etienne M. Aliot;William G. Stevenson;Jesus Ma Almendral-Garrote;Frank Bogun

  • Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling but Not Clinical Improvement Predicts Long-Term Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

    Cheuk Man Yu;Gabe B. Bleeker;Jeffrey Wing Hong Fung;Martin J. Schalij

  • Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Theodorus A.M. Kaandorp;Hildo J. Lamb;Eric Boersma

  • Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

    Philippe Kolh;William Wijns;Nicolas Danchin;Carlo Di Mario

  • Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Panos E Vardas;Angelo Auricchio;Jean-Jacques Blanc;Jean-Claude Daubert

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 2--issues during and after device implantation and unresolved questions.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Theodore Abraham;S. Serge Barold;Ole A. Breithardt

  • Noninvasive Evaluation of the Aortic Root With Multislice Computed Tomography : Implications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Laurens F. Tops;David A. Wood;Victoria Delgado;Joanne D. Schuijf

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 1--issues before device implantation.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Theodore Abraham;S. Serge Barold;Ole A. Breithardt

  • Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with end-stage heart failure.

    Gabe B. Bleeker;Martin J. Schalij M.D.;Sander G. Molhoek;Harriette F. Verwey M.D.

  • Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

    Stijntje Dorien Roes;C. Jan Willem Borleffs;Rob J. van der Geest;Jos J.M. Westenberg

  • Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure before pacemaker implantation

    Jeroen J. Bax;Thomas H. Marwick;Sander G. Molhoek;Gabe B. Bleeker

  • Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality.

    Johannes B. van Rees;C. Jan Willem Borleffs;Mihály K. de Bie;Theo Stijnen

  • Long-Term Prognosis After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Related to the Extent of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling at Midterm Follow-Up

    Claudia Ypenburg;Rutger J. van Bommel;C. Jan Willem Borleffs;Gabe B. Bleeker

  • Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Victoria Delgado;Claudia Ypenburg;Rutger J. van Bommel;Laurens F. Tops

  • Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

    Claudia Ypenburg;Rutger J. van Bommel;Victoria Delgado;Sjoerd A. Mollema

  • Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: ready for routine clinical use?: A critical appraisal

    Jeroen J Bax;Gerardo Ansalone;Ole A Breithardt;Genevieve Derumeaux

  • Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.

    Panos E. Vardas;Angelo Auricchio;Jean-Jacques Blanc;Jean-Claude Daubert

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
Victoria Delgado
Victoria Delgado Leiden University Medical Center
Nina Ajmone Marsan
Nina Ajmone Marsan Leiden University Medical Center
Ernst E. van der Wall
Ernst E. van der Wall University Medical Center Utrecht
J. Wouter Jukema
J. Wouter Jukema Leiden University Medical Center
Albert de Roos
Albert de Roos Leiden University Medical Center
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul Steendijk
Paul Steendijk Leiden University Medical Center
Willem E. Fibbe
Willem E. Fibbe Leiden University Medical Center
Hein Putter
Hein Putter Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for healthcare professionals grows, online degrees and certifications offer flexible options to enter or advance in the medical field. If you’re aiming for leadership roles in nursing, a 1 year dnp program online can fast-track your qualifications while allowing you to balance work and study.

Pharmacy is another crucial pathway. If you’re interested in medication management and patient care, enrolling in the best online pharmacy school can equip you for a profitable and in-demand profession without the need to relocate.

Not all careers require direct patient care. Health information management is vital for the smooth operation of medical facilities, and him programs prepare you to manage patient data, privacy, and compliance through online study.

For those looking to quickly enter the workforce or transition careers, earning a medical coding certification opens doors to administrative roles in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies—all achievable through flexible online classes.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Schalij

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles