World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
134
Citations
69418
World Ranking
2146
National Ranking
81

Jonathon Leipsic publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathon Leipsic sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,065 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jonathon Leipsic D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathon Leipsic sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathon Leipsic is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research activity is focused primarily within the broad field of Medicine, with specific contributions across several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their scientific work encompasses a range of topics relevant to cardiovascular health and imaging technologies. The main research areas include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research

Jonathon Leipsic has contributed to multiple studies published in prominent cardiovascular and radiology journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging

Selected recent papers coauthored by Jonathon Leipsic highlight their involvement in important clinical research and expert consensus documents, including:

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • SCCT 2021 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, 2020, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System, 2022, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Common coauthors include:

  • Philipp Blanke
  • Jeroen J. Bax
  • Daniele Andreini
  • Leslee J. Shaw
  • Gianluca Pontone

Best Publications

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients

    Michael J. Mack;Martin B. Leon;Vinod H. Thourani;Raj Makkar

  • Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms : Results From the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study

    Bonkwon Koo;Andrejs Erglis;Joon Hyung Doh;David V. Daniels

  • Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

    Bjarne L Nørgaard;Jonathon Leipsic;Sara Gaur;Sujith Seneviratne

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve From Anatomic CT Angiography

    James K. Min;Jonathon Leipsic;Michael J. Pencina;Daniel S. Berman

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.

    Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza;Maria C. Alu

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

    Vinod H. Thourani;Susheel Kodali;Raj R. Makkar;Howard C. Herrmann

  • SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee.

    Jonathon Leipsic;Suhny Abbara;Stephan Achenbach;Ricardo Cury

  • SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI).

    Suhny Abbara;Philipp Blanke;Christopher D. Maroules;Michael Cheezum

  • State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques

    Lucas L. Geyer;U. Joseph Schoepf;Felix G. Meinel;John W. Nance

  • SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

    Stephan Achenbach;Victoria Delgado;Jörg Hausleiter;Paul Schoenhagen

  • Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis.

    Manish Motwani;Damini Dey;Daniel S. Berman;Guido Germano

  • Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

    John G. Webb;David A. Wood;Jian Ye;Ronen Gurvitch

  • Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry.

    Henrique B. Ribeiro;John G. Webb;Raj R. Makkar;Mauricio G. Cohen

  • CAD-RADS™: Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology

    Ricardo C. Cury;Suhny Abbara;Stephan Achenbach;Arthur Agatston

  • Anatomical and Procedural Features Associated With Aortic Root Rupture During Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Marco Barbanti;Tae Hyun Yang;Josep Rodès Cabau;Corrado Tamburino

  • 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

    Alexander B. Willson;John G. Webb;Troy M. LaBounty;Stephan Achenbach

  • Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) / transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

    Philipp Blanke;Jonathan R. Weir-McCall;Stephan Achenbach;Victoria Delgado

  • The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial.

    Ronald K. Binder;John G. Webb;Alexander B. Willson;Marina Urena

  • Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography.

    Jonathon Leipsic;Troy M Labounty;Brett Heilbron;James K Min

  • Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

    Sung Han Yoon;Sabine Bleiziffer;Ole De Backer;Victoria Delgado

Frequent Co-Authors

James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Philipp Blanke
Philipp Blanke University of British Columbia
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Filippo Cademartiri
Filippo Cademartiri Fondazione Monasterio
Gianluca Pontone
Gianluca Pontone University of Milan
John G. Webb
John G. Webb University of British Columbia
Stephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Daniele Andreini
Daniele Andreini University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying medicine in the USA but seeking more flexible or accelerated options, a variety of online programs can help you reach your goals. For licensed RNs aiming to advance their qualifications, choosing an rn to bsn without clinicals program is a convenient way to earn a bachelor’s degree without the need for onsite clinical hours.

Those who wish to move into leadership or specialized roles might consider accelerated dnp programs or other dnp online programs. These doctorate in nursing practice degrees are designed for current nurses who want to quickly earn advanced credentials, often with flexible online learning formats.

For those just starting out in nursing, a fast track lpn program can provide a rapid entry point into healthcare. Each of these pathways offers unique benefits and can suit different career goals, schedules, and educational backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathon Leipsic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles