World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
9454
World Ranking
3657
National Ranking
401

Richard D.M. Nash publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D.M. Nash sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 180 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Richard D.M. Nash D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D.M. Nash sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard D.M. Nash is affiliated with the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science in the United Kingdom.

Their research primarily falls under the field of Environmental Science, with a strong focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography, and Genetics.

Main research topics covered in their work include:

  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

The scientist has published multiple papers recently, with titles, years, and publication venues as follows:

  • "Genetic analysis redraws the management boundaries for the European sprat," 2020, Evolutionary Applications
  • "Operationalizing ensemble models for scientific advice to fisheries management," 2021, ICES Journal of Marine Science
  • "Environmental influences on Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengusL.) larvae reveal recent constraints in recruitment success," 2020, ICES Journal of Marine Science
  • "Quantitative molecular detection of larval Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) in stomach contents of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) marks regions of predation pressure," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Recruitment regime shifts and nonstationarity are widespread phenomena in harvestable stocks experiencing pronounced climate fluctuations," 2023, Fish and Fisheries

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Florian Berg
  • Cecilie Kvamme
  • Afra Egan
  • David Lusseau
  • Claus Reedtz Sparrevohn

Their work has appeared consistently in several publication venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)
  • Archimer (Ifremer)
  • Journal of Fish Biology
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Best Publications

  • Age and Growth

    Richard D. M. Nash;Audrey J. Geffen

  • The origin of fulton's condition factor : Setting the record straight

    Richard D. M. Nash;Antonio H. Valencia;Audrey J. Geffen

  • Length-weight relationships for 21 coastal fish species of the Azores, north-eastern Atlantic

    Telmo Morato;Pedro Afonso;Paula Lourinho;João P. Barreiros

  • Lessons learned from practical approaches to reconcile mismatches between biological population structure and stock units of marine fish

    Lisa A. Kerr;Niels T. Hintzen;Steven X. Cadrin;Lotte Worsøe Clausen

  • Synergies between climate and management for Atlantic cod fisheries at high latitudes

    Olav Sigurd Kjesbu;Bjarte Bogstad;Jennifer A. Devine;Harald Gjøsæter

  • Impacts of climate change on the complex life cycles of fish

    Pierre Petitgas;Adriaan D. Rijnsdorp;Mark Dickey-Collas;Georg H. Engelhard

  • Lessons learned from stock collapse and recovery of North Sea herring: a review

    Mark Dickey-Collas;Richard D. M. Nash;Thomas Brunel;Cindy J. G. van Damme

  • Modelling and forecasting stock–recruitment: current and future perspectives

    Sam Subbey;Jennifer A. Devine;Ute Schaarschmidt;Richard D.M. Nash

  • Recruitment in a changing environment: the 2000s North Sea herring recruitment failure

    Mark R. Payne;Emma M. C. Hatfield;Mark Dickey-Collas;Tone Falkenhaug

  • Feeding ecology of the common shrimp Crangon crangon in Port Erin Bay, Isle of Man, Irish Sea

    Chul-Woong Oh;Richard G. Hartnoll;Richard D. M. Nash

  • The cost of metamorphosis in flatfishes

    A.J. Geffen;H.W. van der Veer;R.D.M. Nash

  • The influence of life history dynamics and environment on the determination of year class strength in North Sea herring (Clupea harengus L.)

    R. D. M. Nash;M. Dickey-Collas

  • Population dynamics of the common shrimp, Crangon crangon (L.), in Port Erin Bay, Isle of Man, Irish Sea

    C. W. Oh;R. G. Hartnoll;R. D. M. Nash

  • Temperature-dependent development rates of cod Gadus morhua eggs

    Audrey Geffen;Clive Fox;R D M Nash

  • An application of the annual egg production method to estimate the spawning biomass of cod (Gadus morhua L.), plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) and sole (Solea solea L.) in the Irish Sea

    M. J. Armstrong;P. Connolly;R. D. M. Nash;M. G. Pawson

  • Frequent skipped spawning in the world’s largest cod population

    Jon Egil Skjæraasen;Richard D. M. Nash;Knut Korsbrekke;Merete Fonn

  • Observations on the burrows and burrowing behaviour of Calocaris macandreae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinoidea)

    R. D. M. Nash;C. J. Chapman;R. J. A. Atkinson;P. J. Morgan

  • Reproductive biology and recruitment of the white sea bream in the Azores

    T. Morato;P. Afonso;P. Lourinho;R. D. M. Nash

  • Lumpers or splitters? Evaluating recovery and management plans for metapopulations of herring

    Laurence T. Kell;Mark Dickey-Collas;Niels T. Hintzen;Richard D. M. Nash

  • The influence of nursery ground processes in the determination of year-class strength in juvenile plaice Pleuronectes platessa L. in Port Erin Bay, Irish Sea

    R.D.M Nash;A.J Geffen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Dickey-Collas
Mark Dickey-Collas Technical University of Denmark
Ricardo S. Santos
Ricardo S. Santos University of the Azores
Olav Sigurd Kjesbu
Olav Sigurd Kjesbu Norwegian Institute of Marine Research
Phillip C. Watts
Phillip C. Watts University of Jyväskylä
Myron A. Peck
Myron A. Peck Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Arild Folkvord
Arild Folkvord University of Bergen
Stephen J. Kemp
Stephen J. Kemp University of Edinburgh
Telmo Morato
Telmo Morato University of the Azores
Richard G. Hartnoll
Richard G. Hartnoll University of Liverpool
Pedro Afonso
Pedro Afonso University of the Azores

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in broadening your knowledge or advancing your career in Ecology and Evolution or related fields? Online learning offers flexible options for working professionals and recent graduates alike. While degrees specific to ecology and evolution are growing in availability, many students pursue broader programs in biological sciences, nursing, and healthcare to develop transferable skills.

For those considering healthcare pathways, there are online msn programs for non nurses designed to accelerate entry into advanced clinical roles. If you’re already an RN, comparing programs like capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn can help you find the right fit for your career goals. Many professionals also consider a bsn to msn online bridge to further specialize in areas such as environmental health and public policy.

To maximize value, it is important to choose the nonprofit online colleges that are accredited and recognized for quality. These programs can open doors to research, teaching, and consulting careers in ecology, evolution, and allied health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D.M. Nash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles