World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 179 628 578 392 354 1880 132960
Medicine 184 315 288 200 181 1877 138990

Daniel S. Berman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel S. Berman between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel S. Berman published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 33.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 130 publications in 2020. 74 of the 2,051 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 130. Peak 130 publications in 2020. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 14 publications 1981: 33 publications 1982: 33 publications 1983: 26 publications 1984: 23 publications 1985: 16 publications 1986: 19 publications 1987: 32 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 16 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 22 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 32 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 24 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 27 publications 2004: 32 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 49 publications 2007: 44 publications 2008: 46 publications 2009: 61 publications 2010: 104 publications 2011: 91 publications 2012: 93 publications 2013: 81 publications 2014: 81 publications 2015: 74 publications 2016: 76 publications 2017: 82 publications 2018: 80 publications 2019: 85 publications 2020: 130 publications 2021: 103 publications 2022: 64 publications 2023: 54 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 30 publications
1964 2025

2,051 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel S. Berman: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 2
1975 6
1976 8
1977 7
1978 10
1979 4
1980 14
1981 33
1982 33
1983 26
1984 23
1985 16
1986 19
1987 32
1988 12
1989 16
1990 15
1991 22
1992 11
1993 16
1994 14
1995 32
1996 18
1997 24
1998 15
1999 20
2000 14
2001 17
2002 17
2003 27
2004 32
2005 22
2006 49
2007 44
2008 46
2009 61
2010 104
2011 91
2012 93
2013 81
2014 81
2015 74
2016 76
2017 82
2018 80
2019 85
2020 130
2021 103
2022 64
2023 54
2024 44
2025 30
Total 2,051
Download as CSV

Daniel S. Berman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Berman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,877 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 1,877
Download as CSV

Daniel S. Berman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Berman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 184–185 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 184 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18 184
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2000 - Gifted Teacher Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)

Overview

Daniel S. Berman is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions to radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, biomedical engineering, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel S. Berman include:

  • "Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction," 2020, Circulation
  • "SCCT 2021 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography," 2020, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • "CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System," 2022, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • "Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement," 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Frequent co-authors that have collaborated extensively with Daniel S. Berman include:

  • Piotr J. Slomka
  • Damini Dey
  • Leslee J. Shaw
  • Matthew J. Budoff
  • Robert J.H. Miller

The principal venues where Daniel S. Berman has published are:

  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Daniel S. Berman received the Gifted Teacher Award from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in 2000.

Best Publications

  • Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease

    William E. Boden;Koon K. Teo;Pamela M. Hartigan;David J. Maron

  • Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy

    Leslee J. Shaw;Daniel S. Berman;David J. Maron;G. B. John Mancini

  • Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging)

    Francis J. Klocke;Michael G. Baird;Beverly H. Lorell;Timothy M. Bateman

  • Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease.

    David J. Maron;Judith S. Hochman;Harmony R. Reynolds;Sripal Bangalore

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for the Prediction of Cardiac Death Differential Stratification for Risk of Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Leslee J. Shaw;Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat

  • Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial

    Raj R Makkar;Rachel R Smith;Ke Cheng;Konstantinos Malliaras

  • Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

    G Germano;H Kiat;P B Kavanagh;M Moriel

  • Long-Term Prognosis Associated With Coronary Calcification: Observations From a Registry of 25,253 Patients

    Matthew J. Budoff;Leslee J. Shaw;Sandy T. Liu;Steven R. Weinstein

  • The VIVA Trial Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis

    Timothy D. Henry;Brian H. Annex;George R. McKendall;Michael A. Azrin

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve From Anatomic CT Angiography

    James K. Min;Jonathon Leipsic;Michael J. Pencina;Daniel S. Berman

  • Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality.

    Leslee J. Shaw;Paolo Raggi;Enrique Schisterman;Daniel S. Berman

  • Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality.

    James K. Min;Leslee J. Shaw;Richard B. Devereux;Peter M. Okin

  • Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease : Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Mental stress and the induction of silent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.

    A Rozanski;C N Bairey;D S Krantz;J Friedman

  • Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

    Raj R Makkar;Gregory Fontana;Lars Søndergaard

  • Myocardial Viability and Survival in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

    Robert O. Bonow;Gerald Maurer;Kerry L. Lee;Thomas A. Holly

  • Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease.

    James K. Min;Allison Dunning;Fay Y. Lin;Stephan Achenbach

  • ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging

    Robert C. Hendel;Daniel S. Berman;Marcelo F. Di Carli;Paul A. Heidenreich

  • ACC/AHA/ASNC Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging—Executive Summary

    Francis J. Klocke;Michael G. Baird;Beverly H. Lorell

Frequent Co-Authors

Piotr J. Slomka
Piotr J. Slomka Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
John D. Friedman
John D. Friedman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Guido Germano
Guido Germano Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Sean W. Hayes
Sean W. Hayes Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Damini Dey
Damini Dey Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Stephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Filippo Cademartiri
Filippo Cademartiri Fondazione Monasterio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Medicine but considering alternative or complementary fields? The healthcare sector in the USA offers numerous online pathways that can expand your career options beyond traditional medical degrees.

Healthcare administration degrees are a popular choice for those who want to move into leadership roles within hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations. These programs prepare you for key positions in management and policy.

Nursing professionals seeking career advancement can consider bridge programs, such as moving from associate to nurse practitioner. For those interested, you can explore the asn to np programs, which help you transition efficiently and improve your practice authority.

The field of nutrition is another growing area. Accredited institutions now offer many of the best online nutrition programs, allowing students to specialize in dietetics, health promotion, or research—all online.

For those eyeing healthcare leadership, consider cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs. These ensure you receive education meeting rigorous quality standards, giving you an edge in the competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Berman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles