World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 9971 9355 5132 4741 426 37774

John D. Friedman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John D. Friedman between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John D. Friedman published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2011. 29 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2011. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 19 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 12 publications
1983 2025

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John D. Friedman: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 2
1986 4
1987 2
1988 5
1989 3
1990 5
1991 5
1992 5
1993 5
1994 6
1995 19
1996 11
1997 9
1998 9
1999 5
2000 4
2001 9
2002 9
2003 13
2004 15
2005 11
2006 17
2007 16
2008 15
2009 19
2010 20
2011 25
2012 12
2013 11
2014 9
2015 9
2016 9
2017 10
2018 7
2019 6
2020 24
2021 15
2022 16
2023 17
2024 17
2025 12
Total 444
Download as CSV

John D. Friedman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 426 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 426
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John D. Friedman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John D. Friedman is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's main topics of study include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Circulation

Some of the recent papers by John D. Friedman include:

  • "Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves" (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Transfemoral tricuspid valve replacement and one-year outcomes: the TRISCEND study" (2023), European Heart Journal
  • "Machine learning integration of circulating and imaging biomarkers for explainable patient-specific prediction of cardiac events: A prospective study" (2020), Atherosclerosis
  • "Cardiac Computed Tomography for Quantification of Myocardial Extracellular Volume Fraction" (2023), JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • "Percutaneous or surgical revascularization is associated with survival benefit in stable coronary artery disease" (2020), European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Daniel S. Berman
  • Sean W. Hayes
  • Heidi Gransar
  • Louise Thomson
  • Piotr J. Slomka

Best Publications

  • Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy

    Leslee J. Shaw;Daniel S. Berman;David J. Maron;G. B. John Mancini

  • Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for the Prediction of Cardiac Death Differential Stratification for Risk of Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Leslee J. Shaw;Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat

  • Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease : Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Mental stress and the induction of silent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.

    A Rozanski;C N Bairey;D S Krantz;J Friedman

  • Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

    Raj R Makkar;Gregory Fontana;Lars Søndergaard

  • Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study

    Tarun Chakravarty;Lars Søndergaard;John Friedman;Ole De Backer

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Post-Stress Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Volume by Gated Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Tali Sharir;Guido Germano;Paul B. Kavanagh;Shenhan Lai

  • Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Rory Hachamovitch;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography : a clinical validation study

    Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;John D. Friedman;Fan Ping Wang

  • Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT

    Timothy M. Bateman;Gary V. Heller;A. Iain McGhie;John D. Friedman

  • Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

    Rory Hachamovitch;Alan Rozanski;Leslee J. Shaw;Gregg W. Stone

  • Quantification of Rotational Thallium-201 Myocardial Tomography

    Ernest V. Garcia;Kenneth Van Train;Jamshid Maddahi;Florence Prigent

  • Late reversibility of tomographic myocardial thallium-201 defects: An accurate marker of myocardial viability

    Hosen Kiat;Daniel S. Berman;Jamshid Maddahi;Ling De Yang

  • Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial.

    Alan Rozanski;Heidi Gransar;Leslee J. Shaw;Johanna Kim

  • Prediction of Myocardial Infarction Versus Cardiac Death by Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Risk Stratification by the Amount of Stress-Induced Ischemia and the Poststress Ejection Fraction

    Tali Sharir;Guido Germano;Xingping Kang;Howard C. Lewin

  • Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Daniel S. Berman;Nathan D. Wong;Heidi Gransar;Heidi Gransar;Romalisa Miranda-Peats;Romalisa Miranda-Peats

  • Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans : What is the warranty period of a normal scan?

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men: Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management

    Daniel S Berman;Xingping Kang;Sean W Hayes;John D Friedman

  • Comparison of technetium 99m methoxy isobutyl isonitrile and thallium 201 for evaluation of coronary artery disease by planar and tomographic methods

    Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat;Jamshid Maddahi;Jamshid Maddahi;Lynne T Roy;Lynne T Roy;Ken Van Train;Ken Van Train

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Sean W. Hayes
Sean W. Hayes Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Guido Germano
Guido Germano Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Piotr J. Slomka
Piotr J. Slomka Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Damini Dey
Damini Dey Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nathan D. Wong
Nathan D. Wong University of California, Irvine
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Raj Makkar
Raj Makkar Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional, in-person programs. Today’s students have access to flexible and affordable online options that fit different goals and timeframes. For example, online rn-bsn programs without clinicals are ideal for working nurses who seek to advance their qualifications without the need for additional on-site training.

For those aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles, online dnp programs offer a streamlined pathway to the highest clinical nursing degree. If affordability is a priority, students can also consider affordable dnp programs that help minimize costs while still providing a rigorous education.

To enter the profession quickly, some may prefer accelerated lpn programs, which allow for rapid entry into nursing and healthcare roles. Each of these pathways opens doors to in-demand medical careers, providing greater flexibility for diverse backgrounds and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles