World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
37774
World Ranking
9971
National Ranking
5132

John D. Friedman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 426 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John D. Friedman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John D. Friedman is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's main topics of study include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Circulation

Some of the recent papers by John D. Friedman include:

  • "Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves" (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Transfemoral tricuspid valve replacement and one-year outcomes: the TRISCEND study" (2023), European Heart Journal
  • "Machine learning integration of circulating and imaging biomarkers for explainable patient-specific prediction of cardiac events: A prospective study" (2020), Atherosclerosis
  • "Cardiac Computed Tomography for Quantification of Myocardial Extracellular Volume Fraction" (2023), JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • "Percutaneous or surgical revascularization is associated with survival benefit in stable coronary artery disease" (2020), European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Daniel S. Berman
  • Sean W. Hayes
  • Heidi Gransar
  • Louise Thomson
  • Piotr J. Slomka

Best Publications

  • Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy

    Leslee J. Shaw;Daniel S. Berman;David J. Maron;G. B. John Mancini

  • Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for the Prediction of Cardiac Death Differential Stratification for Risk of Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Leslee J. Shaw;Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat

  • Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease : Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Mental stress and the induction of silent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.

    A Rozanski;C N Bairey;D S Krantz;J Friedman

  • Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

    Raj R Makkar;Gregory Fontana;Lars Søndergaard

  • Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study

    Tarun Chakravarty;Lars Søndergaard;John Friedman;Ole De Backer

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Post-Stress Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Volume by Gated Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Tali Sharir;Guido Germano;Paul B. Kavanagh;Shenhan Lai

  • Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Rory Hachamovitch;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography : a clinical validation study

    Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;John D. Friedman;Fan Ping Wang

  • Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT

    Timothy M. Bateman;Gary V. Heller;A. Iain McGhie;John D. Friedman

  • Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

    Rory Hachamovitch;Alan Rozanski;Leslee J. Shaw;Gregg W. Stone

  • Quantification of Rotational Thallium-201 Myocardial Tomography

    Ernest V. Garcia;Kenneth Van Train;Jamshid Maddahi;Florence Prigent

  • Late reversibility of tomographic myocardial thallium-201 defects: An accurate marker of myocardial viability

    Hosen Kiat;Daniel S. Berman;Jamshid Maddahi;Ling De Yang

  • Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial.

    Alan Rozanski;Heidi Gransar;Leslee J. Shaw;Johanna Kim

  • Prediction of Myocardial Infarction Versus Cardiac Death by Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Risk Stratification by the Amount of Stress-Induced Ischemia and the Poststress Ejection Fraction

    Tali Sharir;Guido Germano;Xingping Kang;Howard C. Lewin

  • Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Daniel S. Berman;Nathan D. Wong;Heidi Gransar;Heidi Gransar;Romalisa Miranda-Peats;Romalisa Miranda-Peats

  • Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans : What is the warranty period of a normal scan?

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men: Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management

    Daniel S Berman;Xingping Kang;Sean W Hayes;John D Friedman

  • Comparison of technetium 99m methoxy isobutyl isonitrile and thallium 201 for evaluation of coronary artery disease by planar and tomographic methods

    Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat;Jamshid Maddahi;Jamshid Maddahi;Lynne T Roy;Lynne T Roy;Ken Van Train;Ken Van Train

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Sean W. Hayes
Sean W. Hayes Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Guido Germano
Guido Germano Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Piotr J. Slomka
Piotr J. Slomka Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Damini Dey
Damini Dey Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nathan D. Wong
Nathan D. Wong University of California, Irvine
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Raj Makkar
Raj Makkar Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional, in-person programs. Today’s students have access to flexible and affordable online options that fit different goals and timeframes. For example, online rn-bsn programs without clinicals are ideal for working nurses who seek to advance their qualifications without the need for additional on-site training.

For those aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles, online dnp programs offer a streamlined pathway to the highest clinical nursing degree. If affordability is a priority, students can also consider affordable dnp programs that help minimize costs while still providing a rigorous education.

To enter the profession quickly, some may prefer accelerated lpn programs, which allow for rapid entry into nursing and healthcare roles. Each of these pathways opens doors to in-demand medical careers, providing greater flexibility for diverse backgrounds and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles