World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
22150
World Ranking
18047
National Ranking
8996

Sean W. Hayes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean W. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 320 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sean W. Hayes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean W. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sean W. Hayes is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a notable focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research centers on several main topics, including:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Sean W. Hayes has contributed extensively to academic literature with a strong presence in several publication venues, such as:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Recent representative papers authored by Hayes include:

  • Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries, 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Machine learning integration of circulating and imaging biomarkers for explainable patient-specific prediction of cardiac events: A prospective study, 2020, Atherosclerosis
  • Percutaneous or surgical revascularization is associated with survival benefit in stable coronary artery disease, 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Benefit of Early Revascularization Based on Inducible Ischemia and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Quantitative Assessment of Cardiac Hypermetabolism and Perfusion for Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • John D. Friedman
  • Daniel S. Berman
  • Heidi Gransar
  • Louise Thomson
  • Piotr J. Slomka

Best Publications

  • Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy

    Leslee J. Shaw;Daniel S. Berman;David J. Maron;G. B. John Mancini

  • Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • The CT-STAT (coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial

    James A. Goldstein;Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan;Aiden Abidov;Stephan Achenbach

  • Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

    Rory Hachamovitch;Alan Rozanski;Leslee J. Shaw;Gregg W. Stone

  • Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial.

    Alan Rozanski;Heidi Gransar;Leslee J. Shaw;Johanna Kim

  • Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Daniel S. Berman;Nathan D. Wong;Heidi Gransar;Heidi Gransar;Romalisa Miranda-Peats;Romalisa Miranda-Peats

  • Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans : What is the warranty period of a normal scan?

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men: Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management

    Daniel S Berman;Xingping Kang;Sean W Hayes;John D Friedman

  • Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease

    Daniel S Berman;Xingping Kang;Piotr J Slomka;James Gerlach

  • Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation.

    Daniel S. Berman;Aiden Abidov;Xingping Kang;Sean W. Hayes

  • Temporal Trends in the Frequency of Inducible Myocardial Ischemia During Cardiac Stress Testing: 1991 to 2009

    Alan Rozanski;Heidi Gransar;Sean W. Hayes;James Min

  • Aortic Size Assessment by Noncontrast Cardiac Computed Tomography: Normal Limits by Age, Gender, and Body Surface Area

    Arik Wolak;Heidi Gransar;Louise E.J. Thomson;John D. Friedman

  • Prognostic Significance of Dyspnea in Patients Referred for Cardiac Stress Testing

    Aiden Abidov;Alan Rozanski;Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes

  • Transient Ischemic Dilation Ratio of the Left Ventricle Is a Significant Predictor of Future Cardiac Events in Patients With Otherwise Normal Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

    Aiden Abidov;Jeroen J Bax;Sean W Hayes;Rory Hachamovitch

  • Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits

    Piotr J. Slomka;Piotr J. Slomka;Hidetaka Nishina;Daniel S. Berman;Daniel S. Berman;Cigdem Akincioglu

  • Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD.

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • The metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and subclinical atherosclerosis assessed by coronary calcium.

    Nathan D Wong;Maria G Sciammarella;Donna Polk;Amy Gallagher

  • Prognostic relevance of symptoms versus objective evidence of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients.

    Michael J Zellweger;Rory Hachamovitch;Xingping Kang;Sean W Hayes

  • Baseline stress myocardial perfusion imaging results and outcomes in patients with stable ischemic heart disease randomized to optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention

    Leslee J. Shaw;William S. Weintraub;David J. Maron;Pamela M. Hartigan

  • The incremental prognostic value of percentage of heart rate reserve achieved over myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the prediction of cardiac death and all-cause mortality: superiority over 85% of maximal age-predicted heart rate.

    Babak Azarbal;Sean W. Hayes;Howard C. Lewin;Rory Hachamovitch

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
John D. Friedman
John D. Friedman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Piotr J. Slomka
Piotr J. Slomka Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Guido Germano
Guido Germano Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Damini Dey
Damini Dey Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nathan D. Wong
Nathan D. Wong University of California, Irvine
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Stephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Medicine in the USA, several related online degrees and accelerated career pathways are worth considering. Nursing roles are particularly popular, and many students explore bridge programs to advance their qualifications while working. For example, a common question is, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Some programs now offer flexible coursework with minimal or no on-site clinical requirements, catering to working professionals.

Those aiming for the highest clinical titles, such as DNP (Doctor of Nursing Practice), often look for efficient routes to completion. Explore the quickest dnp program options available online, as well as community-driven advice on the easiest dnp program reddit users have experienced.

For entry into the nursing field, some learners prefer highly condensed options like the 6 month lpn program online. Each pathway has unique prerequisites and time commitments, so it’s important to compare your options carefully depending on career goals, personal circumstances, and the balance of online study versus in-person requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Sean W. Hayes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles