World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
93
Citations
30300
World Ranking
528
National Ranking
282

Scott Forstall publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Forstall sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 164 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Scott Forstall D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Forstall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • World Wide Web

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Human–computer interaction, Computer graphics, Computer hardware, Artificial intelligence and Gesture. His study explores the link between Human–computer interaction and topics such as World Wide Web that cross with problems in Dashboard and Telephone call. His Computer graphics research focuses on Graphical user interface and how it relates to State and Web search query.

His Computer hardware study also includes fields such as

  • User interface, Mode, Session and Password most often made with reference to Interface,
  • Communication device which intersects with area such as Object based. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Speech recognition and Computer vision. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Sensory cue and Heuristics.

His most cited work include:

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics (2124 citations)
  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image (1402 citations)
  • Portable electronic device with interface reconfiguration mode (616 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in User interface, Human–computer interaction, Computer graphics, Artificial intelligence and World Wide Web. Scott Forstall focuses mostly in the field of User interface, narrowing it down to matters related to Interface and, in some cases, Display device. The concepts of his Human–computer interaction study are interwoven with issues in Graphical user interface, Multimedia and 10-foot user interface.

His study focuses on the intersection of Graphical user interface and fields such as Heuristics with connections in the field of Heuristic. His studies deal with areas such as Orientation, Electronic document, Gesture and Electronics as well as Computer graphics. In his work, Mode is strongly intertwined with Computer vision, which is a subfield of Artificial intelligence.

He most often published in these fields:

  • User interface (22.40%)
  • Human–computer interaction (20.77%)
  • Computer graphics (19.13%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?

  • User interface (22.40%)
  • Computer vision (15.85%)
  • Artificial intelligence (16.94%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

User interface, Computer vision, Artificial intelligence, Computer graphics and Gesture are his primary areas of study. The various areas that Scott Forstall examines in his User interface study include Process, Presentation, Track, Mode and Synchronization. In his study, PATH and Path is strongly linked to Sensory cue, which falls under the umbrella field of Computer vision.

While the research belongs to areas of Computer graphics, Scott Forstall spends his time largely on the problem of Interface, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Human–computer interaction, Password, Session and State. He has included themes like Graphical user interface, Thumbnail Image, Thumbnail, Photo management and Scrolling in his Gesture study. His Graphical user interface research incorporates themes from Object, Computer hardware, Heuristics and Display device.

Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image (1402 citations)
  • Context-aware voice guidance (250 citations)
  • Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Accessing an Application in a Locked Device (213 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • World Wide Web

His main research concerns Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Human–computer interaction, Interface and Graphical user interface. His study on Object, Gesture and Tracking is often connected to Location as part of broader study in Artificial intelligence. Scott Forstall has researched Gesture in several fields, including User interface, Image, Sensory cue and Path.

His study in Human–computer interaction is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Speech recognition, Voice Tag and Presentation. His Interface study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Computer graphics and Display device. His Graphical user interface research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Heuristics and Scrolling.

Best Publications

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics

    Steven P. Jobs;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image

    Imran Chaudhri;Bas Ording;Freddy Allen Anzures;Marcel van Os

  • Portable electronic device with interface reconfiguration mode

    Os Marcel Van;Freddy A. Anzures;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie

  • Portable electronic device with multi-touch input

    Bas Ording;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Portable electronic device for photo management

    Michael Matas;Gregory N. Christie;Paul D. Marcos;Scott Forstall

  • Immediate search feedback

    Scott James Forstall;Donald D. Melton;John William Sullivan;Darin Benjamin Adler

  • Keyboards for Portable Electronic Devices

    Kenneth Kocienda;Scott Herz;Richard Williamson;Gregory Novick

  • Indication of progress towards satisfaction of a user input condition

    Freddy Allen Anzures;Bas Ording;Imran Chaudhri;Marcel van Os

  • Portrait-landscape rotation heuristics for a portable multifunction device

    Scott Forstall;Chris Blumenberg

  • Method, device, and graphical user interface providing word recommendations for text input

    Kenneth Kocienda;Greg Christie;Bas Ording;Scott Forstall

  • Account information display for portable communication device

    Steven P. Jobs;Freddy Allen Anzures;Bas Ording;Imran Chaudhri

  • Touch Screen Keyboards for Portable Electronic Devices

    Kenneth Kocienda;Scott Herz;Richard Williamson;Gregory Novick

  • Methods and graphical user interfaces for conducting searches on a portable multifunction device

    Marcel van Os;Stephen O. Lemay;Paul D. Marcos;Alexandre Aybes

  • Context-aware voice guidance

    Jonathan A. Bennett;Stephen O. Lemay;Marcel van Os;Scott Forstall

  • Threaded presentation of electronic mail

    Scott Forstall;Gregory N. Christie;Steve Lemay

  • Method and system for providing word recommendations for text input

    Greg Christie;Bas Ording;Scott Forstall;Kenneth Kocienda

  • Web-clip widgets on a portable multifunction device

    Scott Forstall

  • Email Client for a Portable Multifunction Device

    Nitin K. Ganatra;Gregory Novick;Stephen O. Lemay;Greg Christie

  • Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Accessing an Application in a Locked Device

    Richard R. Dellinger;Imran Chaudhri;Gregory Christie;Scott Forstall

  • Mobile device base station

    Scott Forstall;Gregory N. Christie;Robert E. Borchers;Kevin Tiene

Frequent Co-Authors

Imran Chaudhri
Imran Chaudhri Humane Inc.
Stephen O. Lemay
Stephen O. Lemay Apple (United States)
Greg Christie
Greg Christie Apple (United States)
Bas Ording
Bas Ording Apple (United States)
Gregory N. Christie
Gregory N. Christie Apple (United States)
Marcel van Os
Marcel van Os Apple (United States)
Richard Williamson
Richard Williamson Facebook (United States)
Scott Herz
Scott Herz Apple (United States)
Patrick L. Coffman
Patrick L. Coffman Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology evolves, related online degrees are becoming increasingly popular for students interested in diverse career pathways. For those focused on safeguarding digital assets, an online master's degree cyber security offers advanced skills in protecting data and managing cyber threats—a field in high demand globally.

Beyond pure tech roles, there are options in fields connected to Computer Science. A best 2 year construction management degree online blends project management, technology, and leadership, opening doors to construction, engineering, and infrastructure management.

Criminal justice is another interdisciplinary path. Students considering legal and forensic tech jobs should review the cost of criminal justice degree and program outcomes before enrolling. These programs can lead to careers in law enforcement analytics, cybercrime investigation, or public safety.

For those inclined toward business and data, online accounting degree programs combine information systems with finance fundamentals, preparing graduates for roles in auditing, compliance, and data analysis.

When exploring these online degrees, consider accreditation, program flexibility, tuition costs, and career support to choose the path that best fits your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Forstall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles