World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
10075
World Ranking
10995
National Ranking
4576

Patrick L. Coffman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick L. Coffman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick L. Coffman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick L. Coffman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • The Internet

His primary areas of study are Human–computer interaction, Graphical user interface, Mobile device, Computer hardware and Computer network. The Human–computer interaction study combines topics in areas such as User interface, Heuristic, Heuristics and Scrolling. His work carried out in the field of Heuristics brings together such families of science as Translation, Artificial intelligence and Computer vision.

Patrick L. Coffman incorporates a variety of subjects into his writings, including Graphical user interface, Content and Set. His Mobile device research includes elements of Metadata, Mode, Embedded system, Network Access Device and Electrical engineering. As part of the same scientific family, Patrick L. Coffman usually focuses on Computer hardware, concentrating on Electronics and intersecting with Touchpad.

His most cited work include:

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics (2124 citations)
  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for manipulating user interfaces based on fingerprint sensor inputs (436 citations)
  • Voicemail manager for portable multifunction device (225 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns User interface, Graphical user interface, Computer hardware, Human–computer interaction and Set. His User interface course of study focuses on Mode and Network Access Device and Mobile device. The various areas that he examines in his Graphical user interface study include Computer graphics, Heuristics, Computer vision and Artificial intelligence.

His study looks at the relationship between Computer hardware and fields such as Interface, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. He interconnects 10-foot user interface, Voicemail and Scrolling in the investigation of issues within Human–computer interaction. His Set research incorporates a variety of disciplines, including Computer network and Database.

He most often published in these fields:

  • User interface (32.39%)
  • Graphical user interface (20.42%)
  • Computer hardware (19.72%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2020)?

  • User interface (32.39%)
  • Computer hardware (19.72%)
  • Mode (11.27%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Patrick L. Coffman mainly focuses on User interface, Computer hardware, Mode, Human–computer interaction and Movement. His User interface research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Computer network, Computer graphics and Display device. His Computer hardware research spans across into areas like Content and Set.

His study of Affordance is a part of Human–computer interaction. There are a combination of areas like Graphical user interface, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Object and Gesture integrated together with his Movement study. The concepts of his Artificial intelligence study are interwoven with issues in Window and Focus.

Between 2018 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • METHODS AND INTERFACES FOR HOME MEDIA CONTROL (27 citations)
  • Devices, methods, and graphical user interfaces for moving user interface objects (6 citations)
  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for window manipulation and management (4 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • The Internet
  • Computer network

His scientific interests lie mostly in User interface, Representation, Computer graphics, Movement and Electrical engineering. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Multimedia and User interface. Throughout his Representation studies, Patrick L. Coffman incorporates elements of other sciences such as Primary and Computing systems.

Graphical user interface, Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution, Window and User input are fields of study that intersect with his Movement study. His Graphical user interface research incorporates themes from Object, Computer vision and Artificial intelligence. His work in the fields of Electrical engineering, such as Signal and Electronics, intersects with other areas such as Power usage, Battery and Closed position.

Best Publications

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics

    Steven P. Jobs;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for manipulating user interfaces based on fingerprint sensor inputs

    Byron B. Han;Matthew E. Shepherd;Imran Chaudhri;Gregory N. Christie

  • Voicemail manager for portable multifunction device

    Freddy Allen San Francisco Anzures;Greg San Jose Christie;Scott Mountain View Forstall;Gregory Santa Clara Novick

  • Analyzing Applications for Different Access Modes

    Matthew E. Shepherd;Craig M. Federighi;Thomas M. Alsina;Gregory N. Christie

  • Data-Driven Media Management Within An Electronic Device

    James D. Batson;Meriko L. Borogove;Gregory R. Chapman;Patrick L. Coffman

  • Variable rate media playback methods for electronic devices with touch interfaces

    Samir B. Gehani;Patrick Lee Coffman;Timothy B. Martin

  • Highlight of item

    N Christie Gregory;Steve Ko;Bas Ording;Maxym I Runov

  • Postponed carrier configuration

    David Fleischman;Patrick Coffman;Jeremy Wyld;Gregory N. Christie

  • Media management and routing within an electronic device

    James D. Batson;Meriko L. Borogove;Gregory R. Chapman;Patrick L. Coffman

  • Power-Off Methods for Portable Electronic Devices

    Steven P. Jobs;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Systems and methods for proactively identifying and surfacing relevant content on a touch-sensitive device

    Daniel C. Gross;Patrick L. Coffman;Richard R. Dellinger;Christopher P. Foss

  • Incoming Telephone Call Management for a Portable Multifunction Device

    Stephen Lemay;Steven Jobs;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie

  • TOUCH SCREEN APPARATUS, METHOD AND GRAPHIC USER INTERFACE FOR DETERMINING COMMAND WITH APPLICATION OF HEURISTICS

    Jobs Stephen P;Forstall Scott;Christie Greg;Lemay Stephen O

  • Portable Multifunction Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Translating Displayed Content

    Francisco Ryan Tolmasky;Richard Williamson;Chris Blumenberg;Patrick Lee Coffman

  • Portable multifunction device, method, and graphical user interface for conference calling

    Scott Forstall;Imran Chaudhri;Michael J. Matas;Marcel van Os

  • Authorizing the activation of a mobile device based on purchase information

    Jeremy Wyld;David Fleischman;Patrick Coffman;Brian Cassidy

  • Touch Input Cursor Manipulation

    Marcos Alonso Ruiz;Stephen O. Lemay;Tiffany S. Jon;Nicholas V. King

  • Overlay for a video conferencing application

    Angela Guzman;Patrick Coffman;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Configuration of Device Settings

    David Fleischman;Patrick Coffman;Gregory N. Christie;Paul Marcos

  • Method and Apparatus for Improved Desktop Arrangement

    Alessandro Francesco Sabatelli;Pierre-Olivier Latour;Gregory Christie;Patrick L. Coffman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen O. Lemay
Stephen O. Lemay Apple (United States)
Imran Chaudhri
Imran Chaudhri Humane Inc.
Gregory N. Christie
Gregory N. Christie Apple (United States)
Scott Forstall
Scott Forstall Apple (United States)
Greg Christie
Greg Christie Apple (United States)
Marcel van Os
Marcel van Os Apple (United States)
Bas Ording
Bas Ording Apple (United States)
Richard Williamson
Richard Williamson Facebook (United States)
Scott Herz
Scott Herz Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is a great way to launch or advance your career in Computer Science. Many students consider the best masters degree to get in computer-related fields, as these programs often lead to high-demand jobs and greater earning potential.

For those looking to enter the tech industry quickly, 1 year associate degree programs online offer a fast and flexible path. These programs can help you build essential skills and qualify for entry-level roles, often without the time commitment required by traditional degrees.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Choosing from the most affordable online colleges allows you to manage tuition costs while earning a respected credential.

Even if your academic history includes a lower GPA, there are options available. You can still pursue a Computer Science degree at online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, helping you get started on a rewarding career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick L. Coffman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles