World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
80
Citations
27712
World Ranking
1072
National Ranking
576

Stephen O. Lemay publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen O. Lemay sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 284 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen O. Lemay D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen O. Lemay sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer network

Human–computer interaction, Graphical user interface, Computer graphics, Gesture and Icon are his primary areas of study. His research integrates issues of Computer hardware, User interface, Natural user interface, World Wide Web and Scrolling in his study of Human–computer interaction. In User interface, he works on issues like Interface, which are connected to Control and Speech input.

His Graphical user interface research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in 10-foot user interface and Instant messaging. His Computer graphics study incorporates themes from Object, Computer vision, Artificial intelligence and Application interface. The study incorporates disciplines such as Selection method, Selection and Text box in addition to Gesture.

His most cited work include:

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics (2124 citations)
  • Methods And Systems For Managing Data (936 citations)
  • Portable electronic device with interface reconfiguration mode (616 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Stephen O. Lemay spends much of his time researching User interface, Human–computer interaction, Computer graphics, Graphical user interface and Gesture. His User interface research focuses on Computer hardware and how it connects with Mode. His study in the fields of Affordance under the domain of Human–computer interaction overlaps with other disciplines such as Conversation.

His Computer graphics research incorporates themes from Representation and Application interface. As a member of one scientific family, Stephen O. Lemay mostly works in the field of Graphical user interface, focusing on Scrolling and, on occasion, Index. His Gesture study combines Computer vision and Artificial intelligence studies.

He most often published in these fields:

  • User interface (35.93%)
  • Human–computer interaction (28.47%)
  • Computer graphics (24.07%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • User interface (35.93%)
  • Human–computer interaction (28.47%)
  • Computer graphics (24.07%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Stephen O. Lemay focuses on User interface, Human–computer interaction, Computer graphics, Movement and Set. His studies in User interface integrate themes in fields like Object, Graphical user interface, Computer hardware and Interface. His Graphical user interface study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Stylus and Home screen.

His study focuses on the intersection of Computer hardware and fields such as Mode with connections in the field of Selection, SwIPe, Record locking and Scrolling. His work deals with themes such as Control and Transmission, which intersect with Human–computer interaction. Augmented reality and Virtual image is closely connected to Representation in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Computer graphics.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Devices, methods, and graphical user interfaces for navigating between user interfaces and interacting with control objects (30 citations)
  • Displaying a scrollable list of affordances associated with physical activities (18 citations)
  • Devices, methods, and graphical user interfaces for system-wide behavior for 3D models (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer network

His primary areas of study are User interface, Human–computer interaction, Graphical user interface, Computer graphics and Multimedia. His User interface research incorporates elements of Control and Input device. His research investigates the connection with Human–computer interaction and areas like Interface which intersect with concerns in Graph.

His research investigates the connection between Graphical user interface and topics such as Movement that intersect with issues in Home screen and Object. His research investigates the connection between Computer graphics and topics such as Representation that intersect with problems in Mode. His Multimedia study combines topics in areas such as Session and Voice communication.

Best Publications

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics

    Steven P. Jobs;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Methods And Systems For Managing Data

    Yan Arrouye;Dominic Glampaolo;Bas Ording;Gregory Christie

  • Portable electronic device with interface reconfiguration mode

    Os Marcel Van;Freddy A. Anzures;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie

  • Portable electronic device with multi-touch input

    Bas Ording;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • METHOD AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR EDITING ON MULTIFUNCTION DEVICE WITH TOUCH SCREEN DISPLAY

    Ording Bas;Kenneth L Kocienda;Moore Bradford Allen;Freddy Allen Anzures

  • Keyboards for Portable Electronic Devices

    Kenneth Kocienda;Scott Herz;Richard Williamson;Gregory Novick

  • Selecting of text using gestures

    Wayne Carl Westerman;Bas Ording;B. Michael Victor;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Indication of progress towards satisfaction of a user input condition

    Freddy Allen Anzures;Bas Ording;Imran Chaudhri;Marcel van Os

  • User Interface for Application Management for a Mobile Device

    Stephen O. Lemay;Sean B. Kelly

  • Portable Electronic Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Displaying Structured Electronic Documents

    Bas San Francisco Ording;Scott Mountain View Forstall;Greg San Jose Christie;Stephen O. San Francisco Lemay

  • Account information display for portable communication device

    Steven P. Jobs;Freddy Allen Anzures;Bas Ording;Imran Chaudhri

  • Touch Screen Keyboards for Portable Electronic Devices

    Kenneth Kocienda;Scott Herz;Richard Williamson;Gregory Novick

  • Method and apparatus for displaying information during an instant messaging session

    Gregory N. Christie;Peter T. Westen;Stephen O. Lemay;Jens Alfke

  • Methods and graphical user interfaces for conducting searches on a portable multifunction device

    Marcel van Os;Stephen O. Lemay;Paul D. Marcos;Alexandre Aybes

  • Context-aware voice guidance

    Jonathan A. Bennett;Stephen O. Lemay;Marcel van Os;Scott Forstall

  • Voicemail manager for portable multifunction device

    Freddy Allen San Francisco Anzures;Greg San Jose Christie;Scott Mountain View Forstall;Gregory Santa Clara Novick

  • Email Client for a Portable Multifunction Device

    Nitin K. Ganatra;Gregory Novick;Stephen O. Lemay;Greg Christie

  • Touch Screen Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Providing Maps, Directions, and Location-Based Information

    Michael Matas;Christopher Blumenberg;Andre M.J. Boule;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Portable Electronic Device for Instant Messaging

    Stephen Olivier Lemay;Marcel Vas Os;Scott Herz;Gregory Christie

  • Portable multifunction device, method, and graphical user interface for interacting with user input elements in displayed content

    Francisco Ryan Tolmasky;Richard Williamson;Patricia J. Coleman;Christopher Blumenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Imran Chaudhri
Imran Chaudhri Humane Inc.
Bas Ording
Bas Ording Apple (United States)
Scott Forstall
Scott Forstall Apple (United States)
Greg Christie
Greg Christie Apple (United States)
Marcel van Os
Marcel van Os Apple (United States)
Patrick L. Coffman
Patrick L. Coffman Apple (United States)
Gregory N. Christie
Gregory N. Christie Apple (United States)
Richard Williamson
Richard Williamson Facebook (United States)
Scott Herz
Scott Herz Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Computer Science, exploring related online degrees can expand your career options. Fields such as criminal justice, accounting, data science, and construction management all offer unique opportunities and often intersect with technology.

If you’re looking for budget-friendly studies, earning a cheap criminal justice degree can be a cost-effective way to enter law enforcement or cybersecurity roles. Alternatively, those with a knack for numbers might consider the accounting degree cost at various institutions before pursuing accounting or finance-related tech careers.

Data-driven roles remain in high demand. By completing an online master data science program, you can qualify for advanced analytics positions across multiple industries.

Lastly, the rise of smart buildings and digital project management makes an online building construction degree an attractive option for those interested in the technology behind construction.

Exploring these pathways can give you the flexibility to tailor your education to the evolving demands of the job market, while managing costs and maximizing career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen O. Lemay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles