World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 69 1918 1857 973 935 127 39139

Bas Ording publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bas Ording between 2000 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bas Ording published across 21 years, from 2000 to 2020, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2007. 1 of the 199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2007. 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 39 publications 2007: 42 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
2000 2020

199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bas Ording: publications per year, 2000 to 2020
Year Publications
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 10
2005 23
2006 39
2007 42
2008 25
2009 5
2010 15
2011 7
2012 9
2013 8
2014 3
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 199
Download as CSV

Bas Ording publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bas Ording sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 127 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544 127
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Bas Ording D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bas Ording sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213 69
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Graphical user interface
  • Artificial intelligence

Human–computer interaction, Computer graphics, Gesture, Graphical user interface and Artificial intelligence are his primary areas of study. The Human–computer interaction study combines topics in areas such as User interface, Simulation and State. His studies deal with areas such as Mode, Input device and Interface as well as User interface.

His Computer graphics research incorporates themes from Object, Electronic document and Z-order. Bas Ording interconnects Application interface, Image, Sensory cue and Path in the investigation of issues within Gesture. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Computer vision and Artificial intelligence.

His most cited work include:

  • Gestures for touch sensitive input devices (2545 citations)
  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics (2124 citations)
  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image (1402 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Bas Ording focuses on Computer graphics, Graphical user interface, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision and User interface. The various areas that he examines in his Computer graphics study include Object, Electronic document and Gesture. His Graphical user interface study also includes fields such as

  • Heuristics that connect with fields like Heuristic,
  • Text entry and related Soft keyboard.

His study in the fields of Word under the domain of Artificial intelligence overlaps with other disciplines such as Set. Bas Ording combines subjects such as Window, Image and Human–computer interaction with his study of User interface. His research in Human–computer interaction focuses on subjects like Interface, which are connected to Computer hardware and Display device.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer graphics (41.32%)
  • Graphical user interface (29.94%)
  • Artificial intelligence (28.14%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?

  • Computer graphics (41.32%)
  • Graphical user interface (29.94%)
  • User interface (26.35%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Computer graphics, Graphical user interface, User interface, Gesture and Computer vision. The study incorporates disciplines such as Electronic document, Soft keyboard and Footmouse in addition to Computer graphics. His Graphical user interface research includes themes of Interface, Heuristics and Human–computer interaction.

His User interface research incorporates elements of Event and Image motion. His research in Gesture intersects with topics in Thumbnail Image, Thumbnail, Photo management and Scrolling. His Computer vision study combines topics in areas such as Sensory cue, Artificial intelligence and Push-button.

Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image (1402 citations)
  • Multimedia control center (186 citations)
  • Computer light adjustment (136 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Graphical user interface
  • Artificial intelligence

His primary scientific interests are in Graphical user interface, User interface, Computer graphics, Display device and Interface. His Graphical user interface study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Scrolling. His study looks at the relationship between User interface and topics such as Identification, which overlap with Human–computer interaction.

His Human–computer interaction study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Heuristics and Heuristic. Bas Ording regularly ties together related areas like Text entry in his Computer graphics studies. His work deals with themes such as Control and Multimedia, which intersect with Display device.

Best Publications

  • Gestures for touch sensitive input devices

    Steve Hotelling;Joshua A. Strickon;Brian Q. Huppi;Imran Chaudhri

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics

    Steven P. Jobs;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image

    Imran Chaudhri;Bas Ording;Freddy Allen Anzures;Marcel van Os

  • Mode-based graphical user interfaces for touch sensitive input devices

    Steve Peter Hotelling;Joshua Strickon;Brian Q. Huppi;Duncan Robert Kerr

  • Proximity detector in handheld device

    Steve P. Hotelling;Brian Q. Huppi;Joshua A. Strickon;Duncan Robert Kerr

  • Gesturing with a multipoint sensing device

    Wayne Carl Westerman;Steve Porter Hotelling;Myra Mary Haggerty;Bas Ording

  • Methods And Systems For Managing Data

    Yan Arrouye;Dominic Glampaolo;Bas Ording;Gregory Christie

  • Operation of computer using touch screen type interface

    Bas Ording;バス オルディング

  • Portable electronic device with interface reconfiguration mode

    Os Marcel Van;Freddy A. Anzures;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie

  • Activating virtual keys of a touch-screen virtual keyboard

    Bartley K. Andre;Bas Ording;Greg Christie

  • ARRANGEMENT OF VIRTUAL INPUT DEVICE ONTO TOUCH SCREEN TYPE USER INTERFACE

    Chaudhuri Imuran;Christie Greg;Ording Bas

  • List scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display

    Bas Ording

  • Portable electronic device with multi-touch input

    Bas Ording;Scott Forstall;Greg Christie;Stephen O. Lemay

  • METHOD AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR EDITING ON MULTIFUNCTION DEVICE WITH TOUCH SCREEN DISPLAY

    Ording Bas;Kenneth L Kocienda;Moore Bradford Allen;Freddy Allen Anzures

  • Portable electronic device for photo management

    Michael Matas;Gregory N. Christie;Paul D. Marcos;Scott Forstall

  • Keyboards for Portable Electronic Devices

    Kenneth Kocienda;Scott Herz;Richard Williamson;Gregory Novick

  • Computer interface having a virtual single-layer mode for viewing overlapping objects

    Bas Ording;John Louch

  • Indication of progress towards satisfaction of a user input condition

    Freddy Allen Anzures;Bas Ording;Imran Chaudhri;Marcel van Os

  • Soft Keyboard Display for a Portable Multifunction Device

    Bas Ording;Kenneth Kocienda

  • Method, device, and graphical user interface providing word recommendations for text input

    Kenneth Kocienda;Greg Christie;Bas Ording;Scott Forstall

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen O. Lemay
Stephen O. Lemay Apple (United States)
Imran Chaudhri
Imran Chaudhri Humane Inc.
Greg Christie
Greg Christie Apple (United States)
Scott Forstall
Scott Forstall Apple (United States)
Marcel van Os
Marcel van Os Apple (United States)
Wayne Carl Westerman
Wayne Carl Westerman Apple (United States)
Gregory N. Christie
Gregory N. Christie Apple (United States)
Duncan Robert Kerr
Duncan Robert Kerr Apple (United States)
John O. Louch
John O. Louch Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science opens doors to a broad range of specialized online programs and career opportunities. For those interested in big data and analytics, consider an online masters for data science. These programs combine technical skills with real-world application, helping you advance in fields like artificial intelligence, data analysis, and machine learning.

If fast-tracking your education is important, options like the accelerated construction management degree can help you step into leadership roles more quickly—ideal if you want to combine technical and managerial expertise.

Business-minded students may benefit from an online mba cheap program. These provide essential business, finance, and management knowledge, amplifying your career prospects alongside your tech skills.

Lastly, a flexible online masters degree, often achievable in a year, offers a quicker route to advancing your expertise or shifting to a new career path. Online education gives you the freedom to learn at your own pace while expanding your qualifications for the ever-evolving tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Bas Ording

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles