World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Reuter

Martin Reuter

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1670 1499 68 66 336 18446

Martin Reuter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Reuter between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Reuter published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 14.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2016. 44 of the 514 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2016. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 10 publications
1991 2025

514 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Reuter: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 6
2003 6
2004 11
2005 20
2006 11
2007 15
2008 15
2009 15
2010 13
2011 21
2012 15
2013 21
2014 32
2015 36
2016 39
2017 29
2018 24
2019 15
2020 28
2021 35
2022 22
2023 36
2024 34
2025 10
Total 514
Download as CSV

Martin Reuter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Reuter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 336 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 336
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Reuter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Reuter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Reuter is affiliated with the University of Bonn in Germany and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans various subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research covers a range of main topics such as:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin Reuter are:

  • "FastSurfer - A fast and accurate deep learning based neuroimaging pipeline", 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Relation Between Sex, Menopause, and White Matter Hyperintensities", 2022, Neurology
  • "FastSurferVINN: Building resolution-independence into deep learning segmentation methods-A solution for HighRes brain MRI", 2022, NeuroImage
  • "Increased hippocampal shape asymmetry and volumetric ventricular asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder", 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "CerebNet: A fast and reliable deep-learning pipeline for detailed cerebellum sub-segmentation", 2022, NeuroImage

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin Reuter include:

  • Monique M.B. Breteler
  • David Kügler
  • Merlin Monzel
  • Santiago Estrada
  • Kersten Diers

Their publications are frequently found in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • NeuroImage
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Mindboggling morphometry of human brains

    Arno Klein;Satrajit S. Ghosh;Satrajit S. Ghosh;Forrest Sheng Bao;Joachim Giard

  • FastSurfer - A fast and accurate deep learning based neuroimaging pipeline

    Leonie Henschel;Sailesh Conjeti;Santiago Estrada;Kersten Diers

  • Head Motion during MRI Acquisition Reduces Gray Matter Volume and Thickness Estimates

    Martin Reuter;M. Dylan Tisdall;Abid Qureshi;Randy L. Buckner

  • Genetically determined differences in learning from errors

    Tilmann A. Klein;Jane Neumann;Martin Reuter;Jürgen Hennig

  • High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging reveals nuclei of the human amygdala: manual segmentation to automatic atlas.

    Z.M. Saygin;D. Kliemann;J.E. Iglesias;A.J.W. van der Kouwe

  • Statistical analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data with Linear Mixed Effects models.

    Jorge L. Bernal-Rusiel;Douglas N. Greve;Martin Reuter;Bruce Fischl

  • The Dynamics of Cortical and Hippocampal Atrophy in Alzheimer Disease

    Mert R. Sabuncu;Rahul S. Desikan;Jorge Sepulcre;Boon Thye T. Yeo

  • Reduced grid-cell–like representations in adults at genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease

    Lukas Kunz;Tobias Navarro Schröder;Hweeling Lee;Christian Montag

  • Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden, Taiwan and China

    Christian Montag;Katharina Bey;Peng Sha;Mei Li

  • Identification of first candidate genes for creativity: A pilot study

    Martin Reuter;Sarah Roth;Kati Holve;Jürgen Hennig

  • Memory Consolidation by Replay of Stimulus-Specific Neural Activity

    Lorena Deuker;Jan Olligs;Juergen Fell;Thorsten A Kranz

  • Beyond revenge: Neural and genetic bases of altruistic punishment

    Alexander Strobel;Jan Zimmermann;Anja Schmitz;Anja Schmitz;Martin Reuter

  • Dopamine DRD2 Polymorphism Alters Reversal Learning and Associated Neural Activity

    Gerhard Jocham;Tilmann A. Klein;Jane Neumann;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Similar Personality Patterns Are Associated with Empathy in Four Different Countries

    Martin C. Melchers;Mei Li;Brian W. Haas;Martin Reuter

  • Molecular genetics support Gray's personality theory: the interaction of COMT and DRD2 polymorphisms predicts the behavioural approach system

    Martin Reuter;Anja Schmitz;Philip Corr;Juergen Hennig

  • The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism impacts parahippocampal and amygdala volume in healthy humans: incremental support for a genetic risk factor for depression.

    C Montag;B Weber;K Fliessbach;C Elger

  • Bayesian longitudinal segmentation of hippocampal substructures in brain MRI using subject-specific atlases.

    Juan Eugenio Iglesias;Koen Van Leemput;Jean Augustinack;Ricardo Insausti

  • BrainPrint: a discriminative characterization of brain morphology.

    Christian Wachinger;Polina Golland;William S. Kremen;Bruce Fischl

  • Physical Exercise during Encoding Improves Vocabulary Learning in Young Female Adults: A Neuroendocrinological Study

    Maren Schmidt-Kassow;Marie Deusser;Christian Thomas Thiel;Sascha Otterbein

  • COMT genetic variation affects fear processing: psychophysiological evidence.

    Christian Montag;Joshua W. Buckholtz;Peter Hartmann;Michael Merz

  • Frontostriatal Involvement in Task Switching Depends on Genetic Differences in D2 Receptor Density

    Christine Stelzel;Ulrike Basten;Christian Montag;Martin Reuter

  • Dopamine DRD2 polymorphism alters reversal learning and associated neural activity

    G Jocham;TA Klein;J Neumann;DY von Cramon

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau
Sebastian Markett
Sebastian Markett Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Bruce Fischl
Bruce Fischl Harvard University
Bernd Weber
Bernd Weber University of Bonn
Christian Wachinger
Christian Wachinger Technical University of Munich
Peter Kirsch
Peter Kirsch Heidelberg University
Juergen Hennig
Juergen Hennig University of Giessen
Nikolai Axmacher
Nikolai Axmacher Ruhr University Bochum
Christian E. Elger
Christian E. Elger University Hospital Bonn
Monique M.B. Breteler
Monique M.B. Breteler German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, such as becoming a licensed mental health counselor. However, it’s important to know that requirements for certification and licensure vary based on location. For instance, the Gilbert mental health counselor certification requirements may differ from those in neighboring cities or states.

Aspiring counselors in Arizona can learn more about specific mental health counselor requirements in Glendale, while those interested in practicing in North Carolina should review the Greensboro mental health counselor certification requirements. Each location has unique standards for education, training, and supervised experience.

If you’re considering Nevada, take time to understand how to become a mental health counselor in Henderson. By researching local pathways, you’ll be better prepared to meet licensing criteria and make informed choices about your online degree program and future career.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Reuter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles