World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5336 4951 2920 2646 95 17572

Kevin P. Conway publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kevin P. Conway between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kevin P. Conway published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2014. 9 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2014. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 8 publications
2000 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kevin P. Conway: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 4
2004 1
2005 4
2006 4
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 2
2011 4
2012 5
2013 5
2014 18
2015 8
2016 5
2017 15
2018 12
2019 8
2020 8
2021 5
2022 7
2023 3
2024 1
2025 8
Total 142
Download as CSV

Kevin P. Conway publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin P. Conway sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kevin P. Conway D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin P. Conway sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kevin P. Conway is affiliated with the National Institute on Drug Abuse in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to medicine and psychology, with significant contributions in clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, epidemiology, physiology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their work covers various topics, which include:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Kevin P. Conway has published extensively in several well-known academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • UNC Libraries
  • JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

The research collaborations of Kevin P. Conway involve frequent co-authors such as Heather L. Kimmel, Andrew Hyland, Kathleen R. Merikangas, Benjamin C. Blount, and Kathryn C. Edwards.

Recent publications by Kevin P. Conway showcase a focus on substance use, tobacco research, and community health interventions. These include:

  • "The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM) Communities Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial at the community level to reduce opioid overdose deaths through implementation of an integrated set of evidence-based practices," 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines (NNAL, NNN, NAT, and NAB) Exposures in the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 1 (2013-2014)," 2020, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • "Substance use patterns in 9-10 year olds: Baseline findings from the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study," 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Predictive validity of the adult tobacco dependence index: Findings from waves 1 and 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study," 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Using Twitter to Surveil the Opioid Epidemic in North Carolina: An Exploratory Study," 2020, JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Best Publications

  • Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky

  • Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures

    H. Garavan;H. Bartsch;K. Conway;A. Decastro

  • Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    Kevin P. Conway;Wilson Compton;Frederick S. Stinson;Bridget F. Grant

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration

    Nora D. Volkow;George F. Koob;Robert T. Croyle;Diana W. Bianchi

  • Mental disorders as risk factors for substance use, abuse and dependence: results from the 10‐year follow‐up of the National Comorbidity Survey

    Joel Swendsen;Kevin P. Conway;Louisa Degenhardt;Meyer D. Glantz

  • Tobacco-Product Use by Adults and Youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014

    Karin A. Kasza;Bridget K. Ambrose;Kevin P. Conway;Nicolette Borek

  • Changes in the Prevalence of Major Depression and Comorbid Substance Use Disorders in the United States Between 1991-1992 and 2001-2002

    M.P.E. Wilson M. Compton;Kevin P. Conway;Frederick S. Stinson;Bridget F. Grant

  • Prevalence, Correlates, and Comorbidity of DSM-IV Antisocial Personality Syndromes and Alcohol and Specific Drug Use Disorders in the United States: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

    Wilson M Compton;Kevin P Conway;Frederick S Stinson;James D Colliver

  • Use and abuse of alcohol and illicit drugs in US adolescents: results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement.

    Joel Swendsen;Marcy Burstein;Brady Case;Kevin P. Conway

  • Common liability to addiction and “gateway hypothesis”: Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective

    Michael M. Vanyukov;Ralph E. Tarter;Galina P. Kirillova;Levent Kirisci

  • Reliability and Validity of Composite Scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Adults

    Robert K. Heaton;Natacha Akshoomoff;David Tulsky;Dan M Mungas

  • Associations between anxiety disorders and physical illness.

    Martin C. Härter;Kevin P. Conway;Kathleen R. Merikangas

  • Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among US Youth Aged 12-17 Years, 2013-2014.

    Bridget K. Ambrose;Hannah R. Day;Brian Rostron;Kevin P. Conway

  • Flavored Tobacco Product Use in Youth and Adults: Findings From the First Wave of the PATH Study (2013-2014).

    Andrea C. Villanti;Amanda L. Johnson;Bridget K. Ambrose;K. Michael Cummings

  • The cognition battery of the NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: Validation in an adult sample

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky

  • NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of executive function measures in adults

    Philip David Zelazo;Jacob E. Anderson;Jennifer Richler;Kathleen Wallner-Allen

  • Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: Overview of substance use assessment methods

    Krista M. Lisdahl;Kenneth J. Sher;Kevin P. Conway;Raul Gonzalez

  • Unemployment and substance outcomes in the United States 2002-2010.

    Wilson M. Compton;Joe Gfroerer;Kevin P. Conway;Matthew S. Finger

  • Association of Lifetime Mental Disorders and Subsequent Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use: Results From the National Comorbidity Survey–Adolescent Supplement

    Kevin P. Conway;Joel Swendsen;Mathilde M. Husky;Jian-Ping He

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilson M. Compton
Wilson M. Compton National Institute on Drug Abuse
Andrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Kathleen R. Merikangas
Kathleen R. Merikangas National Institutes of Health
Cassandra A. Stanton
Cassandra A. Stanton Westat (United States)
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
Raymond Niaura
Raymond Niaura New York University
Joel Swendsen
Joel Swendsen University of Bordeaux
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Richard Gershon
Richard Gershon Northwestern University
Lisa Dierker
Lisa Dierker Wesleyan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Psychology, online degrees open doors to diverse career paths, including becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Each state or city may have unique educational and licensure criteria for this role. For instance, San Jose mft education requirements emphasize graduate-level coursework and practical clinical training. Meanwhile, steps on how to become an mft in Santa Ana focus on regionally accredited degrees and supervised experience.

Exploring other regions, understanding how to become an mft in Scottsdale can provide guidance on Arizona-specific requirements, such as passing national exams. Similarly, those considering the Pacific Northwest should review mft requirements in Seattle for the latest local licensing standards and internship expectations.

By pursuing an accredited online psychology degree, you’ll build a solid foundation for careers like counseling, therapy, or social work. Researching state or city-specific details is crucial to streamline your career pathway and meet the qualifications needed for professional practice.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin P. Conway

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles