World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
41378
World Ranking
10720
National Ranking
5512

Wilson M. Compton publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilson M. Compton sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 302 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Wilson M. Compton D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilson M. Compton sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1963 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1936 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Wilson M. Compton is affiliated with the National Institute on Drug Abuse in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with extensive work in public health, environmental and occupational health, physiology, epidemiology, pharmacology, and clinical psychology. The scientist's main topics include smoking behavior and cessation, opioid use disorder treatment, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, obesity, physical activity, diet, cannabis and cannabinoid research, prenatal substance exposure effects, and behavioral health and interventions.

Compton's recent papers include the following:

  • Methamphetamine Use, Methamphetamine Use Disorder, and Associated Overdose Deaths Among US Adults, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Polysubstance use in the U.S. opioid crisis, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Patterns and Characteristics of Methamphetamine Use Among Adults - United States, 2015-2018, 2020, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Use of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Among Adults With Past-Year Opioid Use Disorder in the US, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Methamphetamine use in the United States: epidemiological update and implications for prevention, treatment, and harm reduction, 2021, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Frequent coauthors include Heather L. Kimmel, Beth Han, Andrew Hyland, Christopher M. Jones, and Carlos Blanco.

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Tobacco Control
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Wilson M. Compton has also contributed to academic literature as shown by their book contributions. They have a publication with Cambridge University Press titled "The Cambridge Handbook of Substance and Behavioral Addictions," published in 2020.

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) across several years: 1936, 1963, and 1977.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence and Co-Occurrence of Substance Use Disorders and Independent Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

    Bridget F. Grant;Frederick S. Stinson;Deborah A. Dawson;S. Patricia Chou

  • Adverse Health Effects of Marijuana Use

    Nora D. Volkow;Ruben D. Baler;Wilson M. Compton

  • DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Disorders: Recommendations and Rationale

    Deborah S. Hasin;Charles P. O’Brien;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges

  • Relationship between Nonmedical Prescription-Opioid Use and Heroin Use

    Wilson M. Compton;Christopher M. Jones;Grant T. Baldwin

  • Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    Kevin P. Conway;Wilson Compton;Frederick S. Stinson;Bridget F. Grant

  • Major increases in opioid analgesic abuse in the United States: concerns and strategies.

    Wilson M. Compton;Nora D. Volkow

  • Prescription Opioid Use, Misuse, and Use Disorders in U.S. Adults: 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health

    Beth Han;Wilson M Compton;Carlos Blanco;Elizabeth Crane

  • Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

    Andrew Hyland;Bridget K. Ambrose;Kevin P. Conway;Nicolette Borek

  • Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: Comparison at intake and 6 months later

    Bertha K. Madras;Wilson M. Compton;Deepa Avula;Tom Stegbauer

  • Sociodemographic and psychopathologic predictors of first incidence of DSM-IV substance use, mood and anxiety disorders: results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

    B F Grant;R B Goldstein;S P Chou;B Huang

  • Prevalence of Marijuana Use Disorders in the United States: 1991-1992 and 2001-2002

    Wilson M. Compton;Bridget F. Grant;James D. Colliver;Meyer D. Glantz

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder among substance users from the general population

    Linda B. Cottler;Wilson M. Compton;Douglas Mager;Edward L. Spitznagel

  • Abuse of prescription drugs and the risk of addiction.

    Wilson M. Compton;Nora D. Volkow

  • Tobacco-Product Use by Adults and Youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014

    Karin A. Kasza;Bridget K. Ambrose;Kevin P. Conway;Nicolette Borek

  • Changes in the Prevalence of Major Depression and Comorbid Substance Use Disorders in the United States Between 1991-1992 and 2001-2002

    M.P.E. Wilson M. Compton;Kevin P. Conway;Frederick S. Stinson;Bridget F. Grant

  • Prevalence, Correlates, and Comorbidity of DSM-IV Antisocial Personality Syndromes and Alcohol and Specific Drug Use Disorders in the United States: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

    Wilson M Compton;Kevin P Conway;Frederick S Stinson;James D Colliver

  • The Role of Psychiatric Disorders in Predicting Drug Dependence Treatment Outcomes

    Wilson M. Compton;Linda B. Cottler;Jacqueline L. Jacobs;Arbi Ben-Abdallah

  • Nonmedical Prescription Opioid Use and Use Disorders Among Adults Aged 18 Through 64 Years in the United States, 2003-2013

    Beth Han;Wilson M. Compton;Christopher M. Jones;Rong Cai

  • Changes in Synthetic Opioid Involvement in Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 2010-2016.

    Christopher M. Jones;Emily B. Einstein;Wilson M. Compton

  • WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: overview of methods and results

    B Üstün;W Compton;D Mager;T Babor

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
Bridget F. Grant
Bridget F. Grant National Institutes of Health
Kevin P. Conway
Kevin P. Conway National Institute on Drug Abuse
Cassandra A. Stanton
Cassandra A. Stanton Westat (United States)
Edward L. Spitznagel
Edward L. Spitznagel Washington University in St. Louis
Andrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Nora D. Volkow
Nora D. Volkow National Institutes of Health
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
Raymond Niaura
Raymond Niaura New York University
David B. Abrams
David B. Abrams New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a medical career but seeking alternatives to the traditional MD path, there are multiple online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Flexible programs can help you advance quickly and efficiently, whether you want to provide care, specialize, or move into management.

For nurses ready to pursue advanced practice, the easiest online dnp programs can fast-track your route to becoming a Doctor of Nursing Practice with coursework designed for working professionals. Those looking to enter the healthcare field sooner might consider an lpn fast track program, which can lead to a licensed practical nurse credential in less time.

Specializations are also possible online. If your interest is in mental health, the fastest psych np program options let you become a psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner in an accelerated format. Alternatively, those interested in the administrative side of healthcare can pursue a healthcare administration degree online for flexible, affordable leadership training.

Each of these online pathways can open doors to rewarding roles in the growing healthcare sector—making it easier than ever to find an option that suits your career goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Wilson M. Compton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles