World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
36649
World Ranking
9992
National Ranking
5143

Edward L. Spitznagel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward L. Spitznagel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 279 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edward L. Spitznagel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward L. Spitznagel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward L. Spitznagel is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their academic and research career is associated with this institution, where they contribute to ongoing work in their areas of expertise.

There is no specific data available on their recent papers, so details about published research articles or focus topics within these papers are not provided.

Information regarding frequent co-authors or collaborative partners is not available, which limits insight into their network of academic partnerships or joint research efforts.

Data on frequent publication venues does not list any specific journals or conferences, so it is not possible to detail where they most often disseminate their research findings.

There are no recorded book publications, so no additional information about contributions to academic books or monographs can be provided.

Similarly, there are no specific fields or subfields of study mentioned, so a detailed breakdown of their disciplinary focus is unavailable.

Information on their main topics of work is not listed, leaving the thematic orientation of their research unspecified.

No awards or honors associated with Edward L. Spitznagel are noted in the available data, providing no indication of formally recognized achievements or distinctions.

Best Publications

  • ASA Physical Status Classifications: A Study of Consistency of Ratings

    William D. Owens;James A. Felts;Edward L. Spitznagel

  • Changing Epidemiology of Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States Over the Last 30 Years: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiologic, and End Results Database

    Ramaswamy Govindan;Nathan Page;Daniel Morgensztern;William Read

  • Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry

    Jay F. Piccirillo;Ryan M. Tierney;Irene Costas;Lori Grove

  • Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing.

    Carol S. North;Sara Jo Nixon;Sheryll Shariat;Sue Mallonee

  • The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance.

    Seth A. Eisen;Douglas K. Miller;Robert S. Woodward;Edward Spitznagel

  • Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion

    RL Grubb;C P Derdeyn;S M Fritsch;D A Carpenter

  • Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms

    Paul K. Tan;Thomas J. Downey;Edward L. Spitznagel;Pin Xu

  • A Comparison of Clinical and Diagnostic Interview Schedule Diagnoses: Physician Reexamination of Lay-Interviewed Cases in the General Population

    John E. Helzer;Lee N. Robins;Larry T. McEvoy;Edward L. Spitznagel

  • Taking chances: problem gamblers and mental health disorders--results from the St. Louis Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study.

    R M Cunningham-Williams;L B Cottler;W M Compton rd;E L Spitznagel

  • Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among older youths in the foster care system

    J Curtis McMILLEN;Bonnie T Zima;Lionel D Scott;Wendy F Auslander

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder among substance users from the general population

    Linda B. Cottler;Wilson M. Compton;Douglas Mager;Edward L. Spitznagel

  • A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic.

    Edward L. Spitznagel;John E. Helzer

  • Psychiatric Disorders in Rescue Workers After the Oklahoma City Bombing

    Carol S. North;Laura Tivis;J. Curtis McMillen;Betty Pfefferbaum

  • The Role of Psychiatric Disorders in Predicting Drug Dependence Treatment Outcomes

    Wilson M. Compton;Linda B. Cottler;Jacqueline L. Jacobs;Arbi Ben-Abdallah

  • Maternal Age and Risk of Labor and Delivery Complications

    Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg;Melissa J. Krauss;Edward L. Spitznagel;Kerry Bommarito

  • Legal status, emotional well-being and subjective health status of Latino immigrants.

    Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg;Luis H Zayas;Edward L Spitznagel

  • Coping, functioning, and adjustment of rescue workers after the Oklahoma City bombing

    Carol S. North;Laura Tivis;J. Curtis McMillen;Betty Pfefferbaum

  • Left globus pallidus abnormality in never-medicated patients with schizophrenia

    Terrence S. Early;Eric M. Reiman;Marcus E. Raichle;Edward L. Spitznagel

  • The impact of heparin concentration and activated clotting time monitoring on blood conservation: A prospective, randomized evaluation in patients undergoing cardiac operation

    G.J. Despotis;J.H. Joist;C.W. Hogue;A. Alsoufiev

  • Differential Prognostic Impact of Comorbidity

    William L. Read;Ryan M. Tierney;Nathan C. Page;Irene Costas

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol S. North
Carol S. North The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg
Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg Washington University in St. Louis
Melissa J. Krauss
Melissa J. Krauss Washington University in St. Louis
Laura J. Bierut
Laura J. Bierut Washington University in St. Louis
Wilson M. Compton
Wilson M. Compton National Institute on Drug Abuse
Joan L. Luby
Joan L. Luby Washington University in St. Louis
David E. Pollio
David E. Pollio National Institutes of Health
Andy C. Belden
Andy C. Belden Washington University in St. Louis
David H. Alpers
David H. Alpers Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical or healthcare career in the USA is evolving thanks to the growing availability of accredited online degrees. These pathways not only offer more flexibility for students, but can also help reduce costs and speed up entry into the workforce.

For those interested in advanced nursing roles or research, phd in nursing online programs provide a convenient option to earn a terminal degree while working. If you are a registered nurse seeking career progression, there are many cheap rn to bsn online programs that make it possible to complete your bachelor’s degree affordably and at your own pace.

Non-nursing majors can also transition quickly into nursing roles by enrolling in online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors. These programs are designed for individuals with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree who want to become advanced practice nurses without repeating years of undergraduate study.

If you’re looking to start your nursing career as soon as possible, consider applying to the easiest bsn program to get into. These schools can help streamline your entry into the profession, making healthcare education more accessible and achievable for a wide range of students.

Best Scientists Citing Edward L. Spitznagel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles