World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth R. Baker

Kenneth R. Baker

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
51
Citations
11619
World Ranking
1017
National Ranking
471

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
54
Citations
12046
World Ranking
3158
National Ranking
939

Kenneth R. Baker publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. Baker sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 123 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Kenneth R. Baker D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. Baker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth R. Baker is affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research activity spans multiple fields, with a significant focus on medicine and neuroscience.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader domains, their research covers several subfields such as:

  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Rheumatology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The key topics that characterize their research contributions are diverse and include:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Photopolymerization techniques and applications
  • Polymer composites and self-healing

Kenneth R. Baker's publication record features papers in several recognized venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
  • http://isrctn.com/
  • Manchester University Press eBooks
  • Lara D. Veeken

Selected recent papers authored by or involving Kenneth R. Baker are:

  • Remote monitoring in rheumatoid arthritis, 2022, http://isrctn.com/
  • Wood fiber - sodium silicate mixtures for additive manufacturing of composite materials, 2022, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
  • O024 / #962 REAL-TIME CONTROL OF BETA-BAND ACTIVITY IN THE SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS: FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS USING PATIENT-SPECIFIC, DATA-DRIVEN COMPUTER MODELS, 2022, Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • PO062 / #752 MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY SOURCE IMAGING OF DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN ESSENTIAL TREMOR, 2022, Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • Index, 2020, Manchester University Press eBooks

Their collaborations involve frequent co-authors with multiple joint publications, including:

  • Leonardo Favi Bocca
  • André G. Machado
  • Júlio Almeida
  • B. Campbell
  • Sean J. Nagel

Best Publications

  • Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review

    Kenneth R. Baker;Gary D. Scudder

  • Principles of Sequencing and Scheduling

    Kenneth R. Baker;Dan Trietsch

  • Sequencing Rules and Due-Date Assignments in a Job Shop

    Kenneth R. Baker

  • Scheduling groups of jobs on a single machine

    Scott Webster;Kenneth R. Baker

  • The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model

    Kenneth R. Baker;Michael J. Magazine;Henry L. W. Nuttle

  • A Multiple-Criterion Model for Machine Scheduling

    Kenneth R. Baker;J. Cole Smith

  • Workforce Allocation in Cyclical Scheduling Problems: A Survey

    Kenneth R. Baker

  • AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ROLLING SCHEDULES IN PRODUCTION PLANNING

    Kenneth R. Baker

  • Dynamic Programming Solution of Sequencing Problems with Precedence Constraints

    Linus Schrage;Kenneth R. Baker

  • A dynamic priority rule for scheduling against due-dates

    Kenneth R. Baker;J.W.M. Bertrand

  • Job shop scheduling with modified due dates

    Kenneth R. Baker;John J. Kanet

  • An Algorithm for the Dynamic Lot-Size Problem with Time-Varying Production Capacity Constraints

    Kenneth R. Baker;Paul Dixon;Michael J. Magazine;Edward A. Silver

  • Basic Techniques for Lot Streaming

    Dan Trietsch;Kenneth R. Baker

  • Sequencing with due-dates and early start times to minimize maximum tardiness

    Kenneth R. Baker;Zaw-Sing Su

  • A bicriterion approach to time/cost trade-offs in sequencing

    Luk N. Van Wassenhove;Kenneth R. Baker

  • Flow shop scheduling with lot streaming

    C. N. Potts;K. R. Baker

  • A critical review of the literature on spreadsheet errors

    Stephen G. Powell;Kenneth R. Baker;Barry Lawson

  • Preemptive Scheduling of a Single Machine to Minimize Maximum Cost Subject to Release Dates and Precedence Constraints

    K. R. Baker;Eugene L. Lawler;Jan Karel Lenstra;A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan

  • A comparison of due-date selection rules

    KR Baker;Jwm Will Bertrand

  • An investigation of due-date assignment rules with constrained tightness

    Kenneth R. Baker;J.W.M. Bertrand

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Magazine
Michael J. Magazine University of Cincinnati
Linus Schrage
Linus Schrage University of Chicago
Eugene L. Lawler
Eugene L. Lawler University of California, Berkeley
Scott A. Neslin
Scott A. Neslin Dartmouth College
A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan
A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan University of Amsterdam
Edward A. Silver
Edward A. Silver University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jan Karel Lenstra
Jan Karel Lenstra Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Chris N. Potts
Chris N. Potts University of Southampton
Thomas P. Novak
Thomas P. Novak George Washington University
Donna L. Hoffman
Donna L. Hoffman George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens pathways to a variety of advanced degrees and careers, particularly in data-driven industries. For students interested in business leadership, exploring mba programs that accept transfer credits can make transitioning easier and more affordable. These programs offer flexible options for math graduates looking to enhance their management skills.

Data analytics is another promising field for mathematics students. Pursuing an ms in data analytics allows graduates to harness their quantitative skills to analyze complex datasets and drive decision-making in various industries like finance, healthcare, and technology.

For those seeking a quicker or less competitive route into graduate business education, reviewing the easiest mba programs to get into provides insights on accessible options without compromising quality. These programs can be a strategic choice for career advancement.

Similarly, if flexibility is a priority, considering an easy online mba offers the convenience of remote learning combined with streamlined admission processes. This pathway suits professionals balancing work and study while aiming to boost their credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth R. Baker

Trending Scientists