World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4232 3908 2012 1824 106 44367

Thomas P. Novak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas P. Novak between 1987 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas P. Novak published across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2000. 5 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2000. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications
1987 2024

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas P. Novak: publications per year, 1987 to 2024
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 2
1993 4
1994 2
1995 1
1996 5
1997 3
1998 5
1999 2
2000 9
2001 1
2002 0
2003 5
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 1
2008 0
2009 6
2010 3
2011 3
2012 9
2013 4
2014 1
2015 4
2016 4
2017 5
2018 6
2019 3
2020 6
2021 2
2022 4
2023 2
2024 3
Total 116
Download as CSV

Thomas P. Novak publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas P. Novak, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from George Washington University, has 116 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive years are 2000 and 2012, with 9 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1988, 1995, 2001 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989, 1991, 2002 and 2008).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.4 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 17 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-1999: 28 publications (2.2 per year); 2000-2012: 44 publications (3.4 per year); 2013-2024: 44 publications (3.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas P. Novak publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas P. Novak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 106
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas P. Novak publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Thomas P. Novak, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from George Washington University, records 106 publications - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Thomas P. Novak, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Thomas P. Novak ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Thomas P. Novak D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas P. Novak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Thomas P. Novak D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Thomas P. Novak, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from George Washington University, records 43 D-Index - the 46th percentile of the discipline.
  • 46% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Thomas P. Novak, and about 54% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Thomas P. Novak ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Thomas P. Novak is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within marketing, social sciences, and technology. The work includes a focus on the intersection of consumer behavior, digital marketing, and emerging technological frameworks.

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Consumer Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Thomas P. Novak's scholarly output features research in several main fields and subfields of study, including:

  • Marketing
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Signal Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • General Social Sciences

The core topics explored in their work cover:

  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas P. Novak include:

  • "Automation Assemblages in the Internet of Things: Discovering Qualitative Practices at the Boundaries of Quantitative Change," 2022, Journal of Consumer Research
  • "A Generalized Framework for Moral Dilemmas Involving Autonomous Vehicles: A Commentary on Gill," 2020, Journal of Consumer Research

Other notable recent papers related to their research network, though authored by collaborators, include:

  • "Voice analytics in business research: Conceptual foundations, acoustic feature extraction, and applications," 2020, Journal of Business Research
  • "Assessing Opportunities and Barriers to Improving the Secondary Use of Health Care Data at the National Level: Multicase Study in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Estonia," 2024, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "The evolving consumer IoT: A novel framework for marketing strategy based on assemblage theory," 2024, Journal of Product Innovation Management

Thomas P. Novak collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Donna L. Hoffman
  • Keith McGregor
  • Gabriell Champion
  • Joe R. Nocera
  • Kevin Mammino

The scholar's interdisciplinary approach integrates qualitative and quantitative methods, addressing topics such as consumer decision processes, moral frameworks in technology use, and innovative marketing strategies in dynamic digital environments.

Best Publications

  • Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak

  • Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations

    Unknown

  • Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach

    Thomas P. Novak;Donna L. Hoffman;Yiu-Fai Yung

  • Building consumer trust online

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak;Marcos Peralta

  • Building Consumer Trust in Online Environments: The Case for Information Privacy*

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak;Marcos Peralta

  • Commercial scenarios for the Web: opportunities and challenges

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak;Patrali Chatterjee

  • A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak

  • Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak

  • The Influence of Goal-Directed and Experiential Activities on Online Flow Experiences

    Thomas P. Novak;Donna L. Hoffman;Adam Duhachek

  • Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age

    Lauren I. Labrecque;Jonas vor dem Esche;Charla Mathwick;Thomas P. Novak

  • Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak

  • Value-System Segmentation: Exploring the Meaning of LOV

    Wagner A. Kamakura;Thomas P. Novak

  • Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach

    Donna L Hoffman;Thomas P Novak

  • Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts

    Patrali Chatterjee;Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak

  • How to acquire customers on the Web.

    D L Hoffman;T P Novak

  • Information Privacy in the Marketspace: Implications for the Commercial Uses of Anonymity on the Web

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak;Marcos A. Peralta

  • Measuring the Flow Experience Among Web Users

    Thomas P. Novak;Donna L. Hoffman

  • Internet and Web use in the U.S.

    Donna L. Hoffman;William D. Kalsbeek;Thomas P. Novak

  • The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak;Ann E. Schlosser

  • Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences Data

    M. Ben-Akiva;M. Bradley;T. Morikawa;J. Benjamin

  • Marketin gi nHypermedi aComputer-Mediate dEnvironments: Conceptua lFoundations*

    Donna L. Hoffman;Thomas P. Novak

Frequent Co-Authors

Donna L. Hoffman
Donna L. Hoffman George Washington University
Wagner A. Kamakura
Wagner A. Kamakura Rice University
Xueming Luo
Xueming Luo Temple University
Praveen K. Kopalle
Praveen K. Kopalle Dartmouth College
Alladi Venkatesh
Alladi Venkatesh University of California, Irvine
P. K. Kannan
P. K. Kannan University of Maryland, College Park
Peter C. Verhoef
Peter C. Verhoef University of Groningen
Charles F. Hofacker
Charles F. Hofacker Florida State University
Cornelia Pechmann
Cornelia Pechmann University of California, Irvine
Harmen Oppewal
Harmen Oppewal Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible, affordable education in Social Sciences and Humanities fields has led to a rise in online degrees. Students now have access to cost-effective and accelerated programs designed to help them enter the workforce more quickly and with less debt.

For those interested in social work, the cheapest online master's in social work programs allow students to obtain a respected MSW degree without the high price tag. Similarly, if you are looking for a career in applied behavior analysis, you can explore the cheapest bcba online program options to help minimize educational expenses.

Time-conscious learners can also benefit from accelerated degree tracks. The best 1 year msw programs provide an intensive curriculum for students who wish to earn their credentials quickly. There are also various accelerated psychology programs online that enable candidates to streamline their path to a rewarding career in mental health, counseling, or research.

With a wide range of online and accelerated programs now available, students can easily find a pathway that fits their budget, timeline, and professional goals in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas P. Novak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles