World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
11065
World Ranking
5412
National Ranking
2957

Linda A. Jackson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda A. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Linda A. Jackson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda A. Jackson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda A. Jackson is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their academic profile does not include recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications currently available in the provided data.

The research fields, subfields, and main topics of their work have not been detailed in the given information. Similarly, there are no records of specific awards or honors attributed to Linda A. Jackson at this time.

Despite the lack of detailed data on specific contributions or thematic focuses, the association with Michigan State University indicates a professional connection to a major research institution in the United States, which supports a broad range of scientific and academic disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching

    Linda A. Jackson;Kelly S. Ervin;Philip D. Gardner;Neal Schmitt

  • The Role of Threats in the Racial Attitudes of Blacks and Whites

    Walter G. Stephan;Kurt A. Boniecki;Oscar Ybarra;Ann Bettencourt

  • Race, gender, and information technology use: The new digital divide

    Linda A. Jackson;Yong Zhao;Anthony Kolenic;Hiram E. Fitzgerald

  • Does home Internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children?

    Linda A. Jackson;Alexander von Eye;Frank A. Biocca;Gretchen Barbatsis

  • Information technology use and creativity: Findings from the Children and Technology Project

    Linda A. Jackson;Edward A. Witt;Alexander Ivan Games;Hiram E. Fitzgerald

  • Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence : a meta-analytic review

    Linda A. Jackson;John E. Hunter;Carole N. Hodge

  • Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries.

    Linda A. Jackson;Linda A. Sullivan;Richard J. Harnish;Carole N. Hodge

  • The relationships among the Big Five Personality factors, self-esteem, narcissism, and sensation-seeking to Chinese University students' uses of social networking sites (SNSs)

    Jin-Liang Wang;Linda A. Jackson;Da-Jun Zhang;Zhi-Qiang Su

  • Cultural differences in social networking site use: A comparative study of China and the United States

    Linda A. Jackson;Jin-Liang Wang

  • Physical Appearance and Gender: Sociobiological and Sociocultural Perspectives

    Linda A. Jackson

  • The effects of Social Networking Site (SNS) use on college students' friendship and well-being

    Jin-Liang Wang;Linda A. Jackson;James Gaskin;Hai-Zhen Wang

  • Stereotype effects of attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike.

    Linda A. Jackson;Linda A. Sullivan;Carole N. Hodge

  • Self-concept, self-esteem, gender, race and information technology use

    Linda A. Jackson;Alexander von Eye;Hiram E. Fitzgerald;Yong Zhao

  • A longitudinal study of the effects of Internet use and videogame playing on academic performance and the roles of gender, race and income in these relationships

    Linda A. Jackson;Alexander von Eye;Edward A. Witt;Yong Zhao

  • Internet use, videogame playing and cell phone use as predictors of children's body mass index (BMI), body weight, academic performance, and social and overall self-esteem

    Linda A. Jackson;Alexander von Eye;Hiram E. Fitzgerald;Edward A. Witt

  • Components of Gender Stereotypes Their Implications for Inferences on Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Dimensions

    Linda A. Jackson;Thomas F. Cash

  • Predicting Social Networking Site (SNS) use: Personality, attitudes, motivation and Internet self-efficacy

    Jin-Liang Wang;Linda A. Jackson;Hai-Zhen Wang;James Gaskin

  • Trends in youth's videogame playing, overall computer use, and communication technology use: The impact of self-esteem and the Big Five personality factors

    Edward A. Witt;Adam J. Massman;Linda A. Jackson

  • Height Stereotypes of Women and Men: The Liabilities of Shortness for Both Sexes

    Linda A. Jackson;Kelly S. Ervin

  • The downside of religious attire: The Muslim headscarf and expectations of obtaining employment

    Sonia Ghumman;Linda A. Jackson

Frequent Co-Authors

Yong Zhao
Yong Zhao University of Kansas
Hiram E. Fitzgerald
Hiram E. Fitzgerald Michigan State University
Alexander von Eye
Alexander von Eye Michigan State University
Frank Biocca
Frank Biocca New Jersey Institute of Technology
Neil E. Reiner
Neil E. Reiner University of British Columbia
B. Brett Finlay
B. Brett Finlay University of British Columbia
Martin Hirst
Martin Hirst University of British Columbia
Natalie C. J. Strynadka
Natalie C. J. Strynadka University of British Columbia
Oscar Ybarra
Oscar Ybarra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Donna Cross
Donna Cross Telethon Kids Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of in-demand career pathways, many of which can start with online degrees. For those interested in the intersection of business and psychology, you can become a business psychologist, helping organizations improve employee well-being and productivity.

If you're passionate about supporting child development, there are specialized fields to explore. Learn how do you become a child life specialist to assist children and families in healthcare settings. Alternatively, discover how many years to become a child psychologist and what it takes to support children’s mental health in clinical or school environments.

For those seeking broader clinical practice, it’s important to understand clinical psychologist degree requirements, as this career typically requires advanced graduate-level education and supervised training.

Each psychology pathway offers its own set of professional requirements and potential for specialization, making it vital to research your options before choosing an online degree or career focus.

Best Scientists Citing Linda A. Jackson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles