World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
84
Citations
40680
World Ranking
827
National Ranking
43

David J. Hawkes publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Hawkes sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 588 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David J. Hawkes D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Hawkes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

David J. Hawkes is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with specific work focusing on subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors

David J. Hawkes has published papers in a variety of venues, including:

  • Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
  • 7th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES

Their recent papers include:

  • "Evaluation of MRI-derived surrogate signals to model respiratory motion," 2020, Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
  • "2D-3D motion registration of rigid objects within a soft tissue structure," 2022, 7th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography
  • "Pre-Quantized Deep Learning Models Codified in ONNX to Enable Hardware/Software Co-Design," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Does subscapularis tendon repair during primary reverse total shoulder replacement improve shoulder stability or functional outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," 2025, Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES

The frequent co-authors of David J. Hawkes include:

  • Björn Eiben
  • Huong Elena Tran
  • Andreas Wetscherek
  • Uwe Oelfke
  • G. Meedt

Additionally, David J. Hawkes has contributed to book publications, with a notable work published by Springer International Publishing titled "The Reign of Anti-logos" in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images

    D. Rueckert;L.I. Sonoda;C. Hayes;D.L.G. Hill

  • An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment

    Colin Studholme;Derek L. G. Hill;David J. Hawkes

  • Medical image registration

    Derek L G Hill;Philipp G Batchelor;Mark Holden;David J Hawkes

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Retrospective Intermodality Brain Image Registration Techniques

    West J;Fitzpatrick Jm;Wang My;Dawant Bm

  • Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units

    Marc Modat;Gerard R. Ridgway;Zeike A. Taylor;Manja Lehmann

  • A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration

    G.P. Penney;J. Weese;J.A. Little;P. Desmedt

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    G Z Yang;D Hawkes;D Rueckert;J A Noble

  • Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures

    Colin Studholme;Derek L. G. Hill;David J. Hawkes

  • Automated 3-D registration of MR and CT images of the head

    Colin Studholme;Derek L. G. Hill;David J. Hawkes

  • A Generic Framework for Non-rigid Registration Based on Non-uniform Multi-level Free-Form Deformations

    Julia A. Schnabel;Daniel Rueckert;Marcel Quist;Jane M. Blackall

  • Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration

    M. Holden;D.L.G. Hill;E.R.E. Denton;J.M. Jarosz

  • Respiratory motion models: a review.

    Jamie McClelland;David J. Hawkes;Tobias Schaeffter;Tobias Schaeffter;Andrew P. King;Andrew P. King

  • Cardiac catheterisation guided by MRI in children and adults with congenital heart disease.

    Reza Razavi;Derek L. G. Hill;Stephen F. Keevil;Marc E. Miquel

  • Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images

    J.A. Schnabel;C. Tanner;A.D. Castellano-Smith;A. Degenhard

  • Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features.

    D. L G. Hill;D. J. Hawkes;J. E. Crossman;M. J. Gleeson

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2009

    Guang-Zhong Yang;David Hawkes;Daniel Rueckert;Alison Noble

  • Deformations Incorporating Rigid Structures

    J.A. Little;D.L.G. Hill;D.J. Hawkes

  • Registration of freehand 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance liver images.

    Graeme P. Penney;Jane M. Blackall;M. S. Hamady;T. Sabharwal

  • Voxel similarity measures for automated image registration

    Derek L.G. Hill;Colin Studholme;David John Hawkes

  • Investigation of intraoperative brain deformation using a 1.5-T interventional MR system: preliminary results

    C.R. Maurer;D.L.G. Hill;A.J. Martin;Haiying Liu

  • Design and evaluation of a system for microscope-assisted guided interventions (MAGI)

    P.J. Edwards;A.P. King;C.R. Maurer;D.A. De Cunha

Frequent Co-Authors

Derek L. G. Hill
Derek L. G. Hill Panoramic Digital Health
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Graeme P. Penney
Graeme P. Penney King's College London
Dean C. Barratt
Dean C. Barratt University College London
Martin O. Leach
Martin O. Leach Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
David Atkinson
David Atkinson University of Liverpool
Matthew J. Clarkson
Matthew J. Clarkson University College London
Daniel Rueckert
Daniel Rueckert Technical University of Munich
Julia A. Schnabel
Julia A. Schnabel King's College London
Marc Modat
Marc Modat King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring Computer Science in the USA, you may also be interested in related fields that blend technology and innovation. Computer Science graduates can pursue diverse roles in IT, software development, or further specialize in areas with significant overlap—such as engineering and environmental sciences.

Interested in fast-tracking your education? A fast track computer science degree allows motivated students to complete coursework more quickly and enter the workforce sooner. Similarly, those wanting an interdisciplinary approach can examine what you can do with an environmental science degree to contribute to sustainability and resource management challenges.

Engineering offers exciting alternatives for those fascinated by tech-driven solutions. Consider the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of environmental engineering schools online or an online mechanical engineering degree to launch a career in fields like energy, robotics, or infrastructure. These online degrees enable you to build a broad skill set and adapt to evolving technology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Hawkes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles