World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
132
Citations
93473
World Ranking
96
National Ranking
8

Daniel Rueckert publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Rueckert sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 1,187 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Daniel Rueckert D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Rueckert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2016 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to biomedical image computing
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering (UK)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Daniel Rueckert is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany, focusing primarily on research at the intersection of medicine and computer science. Their work encompasses various subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, as well as biomedical engineering.

Their research topics cover a range of areas in medical imaging and analysis, notably:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis

Recent publications demonstrate engagement with both methodological advances and clinical applications. Notable papers include:

  • "Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making" (2024, Nature Medicine)
  • "End-to-end privacy preserving deep learning on multi-institutional medical imaging" (2021, Nature Machine Intelligence)
  • "Federated deep learning for detecting COVID-19 lung abnormalities in CT: a privacy-preserving multinational validation study" (2021, npj Digital Medicine)
  • "A global benchmark of algorithms for segmenting the left atrium from late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging" (2020, Medical Image Analysis)
  • "A population-based phenome-wide association study of cardiac and aortic structure and function" (2020, Nature Medicine)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Georgios Kaissis, Kerstin Hammernik, Joseph V. Hajnal, Benedikt Wiestler, and Wenjia Bai. These coauthors appear regularly across their body of work.

Publication venues for their research include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Medical Image Analysis

In terms of book contributions, Daniel Rueckert has authored works published by Springer Science+Business Media and IntechOpen. Titles include "Clinical Image-Based Procedures, Distributed and Collaborative Learning, Artificial Intelligence for Combating COVID-19 and Secure and Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning" (2021) and "Gamification - Analysis, Design, Development and Ludification" (2022).

Awards received include recognition as an IEEE Fellow in 2016 for contributions to biomedical image computing, Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering (UK) in 2015, and Fellowship of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data.

    S M Smith;M Jenkinson;H Johansen-Berg;D Rueckert

  • Real-Time Single Image and Video Super-Resolution Using an Efficient Sub-Pixel Convolutional Neural Network

    Wenzhe Shi;Jose Caballero;Ferenc Huszar;Johannes Totz

  • Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images

    D. Rueckert;L.I. Sonoda;C. Hayes;D.L.G. Hill

  • Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas

    Ozan Oktay;Jo Schlemper;Loïc Le Folgoc;Matthew C. H. Lee

  • Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentation

    Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Christian Ledig;Virginia F.J. Newcombe;Joanna P. Simpson

  • Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration.

    Arno Klein;Jesper L. R. Andersson;Babak A. Ardekani;Babak A. Ardekani;John Ashburner

  • Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge

    Spyridon Bakas;Mauricio Reyes;Andras Jakab;Stefan Bauer

  • Attention gated networks: Learning to leverage salient regions in medical images.

    Jo Schlemper;Ozan Oktay;Michiel Schaap;Mattias P. Heinrich

  • A Review of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Imaging Traits, Technology Trends, Case Studies With Progress Highlights, and Future Promises

    S. Kevin Zhou;Hayit Greenspan;Christos Davatzikos;James S. Duncan

  • A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction

    Jo Schlemper;Jose Caballero;Joseph V. Hajnal;Anthony N. Price

  • Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy

    Paul Aljabar;Rolf A. Heckemann;Alexander Hammers;Joseph V. Hajnal

  • Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

    Rolf A. Heckemann;Joseph V. Hajnal;Paul Aljabar;Daniel Rueckert

  • Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Review.

    Chen Chen;Chen Qin;Huaqi Qiu;Giacomo Tarroni;Giacomo Tarroni

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    G Z Yang;D Hawkes;D Rueckert;J A Noble

  • Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNNs): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentation

    Ozan Oktay;Enzo Ferrante;Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Mattias Heinrich

  • Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks

    Wenjia Bai;Matthew Sinclair;Giacomo Tarroni;Ozan Oktay

  • Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging

    Georgios A. Kaissis;Georgios A. Kaissis;Marcus R. Makowski;Daniel Rückert;Rickmer F. Braren

  • Disease prediction using graph convolutional networks: Application to Autism Spectrum Disorder and Alzheimer's disease.

    Sarah Parisot;Sofia Ira Ktena;Enzo Ferrante;Matthew C. H. Lee

  • Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics

    Stephen M Smith;Heidi Johansen-Berg;Mark Jenkinson;Daniel Rueckert

  • Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction

    Chen Qin;Jo Schlemper;Jose Caballero;Anthony N. Price

  • Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration

    D. Rueckert;A.F. Frangi;J.A. Schnabel

  • The Developing Human Connectome Project: a Minimal Processing Pipeline for Neonatal Cortical Surface Reconstruction

    Antonios Makropoulos;Emma C. Robinson;Emma C. Robinson;Andreas Schuh;Robert Wright

  • Self-supervised learning for medical image analysis using image context restoration.

    Liang Chen;Paul Bentley;Kensaku Mori;Kazunari Misawa

  • Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling

    A.F. Frangi;D. Rueckert;J.A. Schnabel;W.J. Niessen

  • Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNN): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentation

    Ozan Oktay;Enzo Ferrante;Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Mattias Heinrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph V. Hajnal
Joseph V. Hajnal King's College London
Wenjia Bai
Wenjia Bai Imperial College London
Paul Aljabar
Paul Aljabar King's College London
Ben Glocker
Ben Glocker Imperial College London
Bernhard Kainz
Bernhard Kainz Imperial College London
Wenzhe Shi
Wenzhe Shi Twitter (United States)
Christian Ledig
Christian Ledig University of Bamberg
Ozan Oktay
Ozan Oktay Imperial College London
Alexander Hammers
Alexander Hammers King's College London
Konstantinos Kamnitsas
Konstantinos Kamnitsas University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open new doors for students interested in computer science. Many learners start their journey with an associate degree online, a flexible and affordable entry point leading to diverse IT careers or seamless transfer to a bachelor’s program.

For those seeking to advance quickly, the shortest master degree programs offer accelerated paths to specialized knowledge and higher earning potential. Popular choices in the USA include computing, data science, cybersecurity, and AI-related fields.

Choosing the right master’s program is key to future job prospects. Discover which master's degree is most in demand in usa to align your qualification with current industry needs. This ensures strong employability and a rewarding career pathway.

Affordability is a major concern for many students. Consider the options at cheap online degrees fast to obtain a quality education without financial strain. By researching and comparing programs, you can find affordable, accredited degrees tailored to your ambitions in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Rueckert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles