World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
72
Citations
33425
World Ranking
1639
National Ranking
89

Alejandro F. Frangi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alejandro F. Frangi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 568 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alejandro F. Frangi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alejandro F. Frangi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - IEEE EMBS Technical Achievement Award For pioneering contributions in model-based image computing and image-based computational modelling in medicine with clinical and innovation impact
  • 2021 - MICCAI Fellow For outstanding contributions to computational medical imaging
  • 2021 - MICCAI Fellow For outstanding contributions to computational medical imaging
  • 2021 - IEEE EMBS Technical Achievement Award For pioneering contributions in model-based image computing and image-based computational modelling in medicine with clinical and innovation impact
  • 2020 - SPIE Fellow
  • 2014 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to medical image analysis and image-based computational physiology
  • 2013 - EAMBES Fellow
  • 2013 - EAMBES Fellow
  • 2006 - IEEE EMBS Early Career Award for outstanding contributions to medical image computing, especially cardiovascular and cerebrovascular image analysis using model- and registration-based methods
  • 2006 - IEEE EMBS Early Career Award for outstanding contributions to medical image computing, especially cardiovascular and cerebrovascular image analysis using model- and registration-based methods
  • 2004 - Ramón y Cajal Research Fellowship
  • 2004 - Ramón y Cajal Research Fellowship

Overview

Alejandro F. Frangi is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research output spans multiple publications and contributions in the fields of Medicine and Computer Science, with significant focus on subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics explored in their work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Medical Image Segmentation Techniques, AI in cancer detection, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Advanced Neural Network Applications, and Retinal Imaging and Analysis.

Frequent coauthors of Alejandro F. Frangi include Nishant Ravikumar, Haoran Dou, Yan Xia, Dong Ni, and Baiying Lei.

Publications appear primarily in notable venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Medical Image Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, npj Digital Medicine, and Computers in Biology and Medicine.

Recent papers feature the following:

  • The UK Biobank imaging enhancement of 100,000 participants: rationale, data collection, management and future directions (2020, Nature Communications)
  • CS 2-Net: Deep learning segmentation of curvilinear structures in medical imaging (2020, Medical Image Analysis)
  • Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review (2020, Journal of Medical Imaging)
  • Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Musculoskeletal Modeling: Predicting Muscle Forces and Joint Kinematics From Surface EMG (2022, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering)
  • FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare (2025, BMJ)

Alejandro F. Frangi has contributed to several books published by Springer Science+Business Media and the European Organization for Nuclear Research. Titles include Information Processing in Medical Imaging (2023), Medical Imaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis (2023), Proceedings of 2023 International Conference on Medical Imaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis (MICAD 2023) (2024), and Unlocking the power of computational modelling and simulation across the product lifecycle in life sciences: A UK Landscape Report (2023).

The scientist has been recognized with the SPIE Fellow award in 2020 and the IEEE Fellow award in 2014, the latter awarded for contributions to medical image analysis and image-based computational physiology.

Best Publications

  • Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering

    Alejandro F. Frangi;Wiro J. Niessen;Koen L. Vincken;Max A. Viergever

  • Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition

    Jian Yang;D. Zhang;A.F. Frangi;Jing-yu Yang

  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2015

    Nassir Navab;Joachim Hornegger;William M. Wells;Alejandro F. Frangi

  • KPCA plus LDA: a complete kernel Fisher discriminant framework for feature extraction and recognition

    Jian Yang;A.F. Frangi;Jing-Yu Yang;David Zhang

  • Three-dimensional modeling for functional analysis of cardiac images, a review

    A.F. Frangi;W.J. Niessen;M.A. Viergever

  • Active shape model segmentation with optimal features

    B. van Ginneken;A.F. Frangi;J.J. Staal;B.M. ter Haar Romeny

  • Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity

    J.R. Cebral;M.A. Castro;S. Appanaboyina;C.M. Putman

  • Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration

    D. Rueckert;A.F. Frangi;J.A. Schnabel

  • Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling

    A.F. Frangi;D. Rueckert;J.A. Schnabel;W.J. Niessen

  • Model-based quantitation of 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images

    A.F. Frangi;W.J. Niessen;R.M. Hoogeveen;T. van Walsum

  • CS2-Net: Deep learning segmentation of curvilinear structures in medical imaging.

    Lei Mou;Yitian Zhao;Huazhu Fu;Yonghuai Liu

  • Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care

    Lena Maier-Hein;Matthias Eisenmann;Annika Reinke;Sinan Onogur

  • A review of heart chamber segmentation for structural and functional analysis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

    Peng Peng;Karim Lekadir;Ali Gooya;Ling Shao

  • The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB)

    Javier Ortega-Garcia;Julian Fierrez;Fernando Alonso-Fernandez;Javier Galbally

  • SPASM: A 3D-ASM for segmentation of sparse and arbitrarily oriented cardiac MRI data

    Hans C. van Assen;Mikhail G. Danilouchkine;Alejandro F. Frangi;Sebastián Ordás

  • CS-Net: Channel and Spatial Attention Network for Curvilinear Structure Segmentation

    Lei Mou;Yitian Zhao;Li Chen;Jun Cheng

  • Essence of kernel Fisher discriminant

    Jian Yang;Zhong Jin;Jing-yu Yang;David Zhang

  • Automatic Construction of 3D Statistical Deformation Models Using Non-rigid Registration

    Daniel Rueckert;Alejandro F. Frangi;Alejandro F. Frangi;Julia A. Schnabel

  • Retinal Image Synthesis and Semi-Supervised Learning for Glaucoma Assessment

    Andres Diaz-Pinto;Adrian Colomer;Valery Naranjo;Sandra Morales

  • Benchmarking framework for myocardial tracking and deformation algorithms: an open access database.

    C. Tobon-Gomez;M. De Craene;M. De Craene;K. McLeod;L. Tautz

  • Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review

    Ehsan Abadi;William P. Segars;Benjamin M. W. Tsui;Paul E. Kinahan

  • Medical image analysis

    Baba C. Vemuri;James S. Duncan

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart Bijnens
Bart Bijnens University of Barcelona
Wiro J. Niessen
Wiro J. Niessen University Medical Center Groningen
Peter Hunter
Peter Hunter University of Auckland
Daniel Rueckert
Daniel Rueckert Technical University of Munich
Max A. Viergever
Max A. Viergever Utrecht University
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt Leiden University Medical Center
Julia A. Schnabel
Julia A. Schnabel King's College London
Maxime Sermesant
Maxime Sermesant Université Côte d'Azur
Steffen E. Petersen
Steffen E. Petersen Queen Mary University of London
Johan H. C. Reiber
Johan H. C. Reiber Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and specialized career tracks. Many students choose to broaden their skillsets by exploring adjacent fields or dual specialties through accredited online programs.

For those interested in engineering, exploring the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs can provide valuable technical expertise. Mechanical engineering knowledge often complements computer science, especially in robotics and hardware development.

If your interests lean toward scientific analysis and research, consider pursuing online physics degrees. A strong physics background can boost your understanding of computational modeling, simulations, and problem-solving skills that are crucial in advanced computing roles.

The rise of big data makes analytical expertise highly valuable. Top data science programs deliver advanced training in statistics, machine learning, and data-driven decision making—essential skills for today’s tech-forward jobs.

Finally, students who want to specialize in hardware, circuits, or embedded systems can look into the best online electrical engineering programs USA. Combining this expertise with Computer Science can pave the way for innovative careers in tech hardware and IoT.

Best Scientists Citing Alejandro F. Frangi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles