World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
47545
World Ranking
14820
National Ranking
1363

Steffen E. Petersen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steffen E. Petersen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 529 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steffen E. Petersen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steffen E. Petersen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steffen E. Petersen is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a strong specialization in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. The scientist has contributed extensively to several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, and Epidemiology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Their publication record includes numerous contributions to prominent journals, notably the European Heart Journal and its specialized branch, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. Other frequent venues include Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging.

Significant recent papers by Steffen E. Petersen encompass:

  • "2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure," published in 2021 in European Heart Journal
  • "2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)," published in 2020 in European Heart Journal
  • "2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice," published in 2021 in European Heart Journal
  • "2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation," published in 2020 in European Heart Journal
  • "2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes," published in 2023 in European Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Steffen E. Petersen include:

  • Nay Aung
  • Zahra Raisi-Estabragh
  • Stefan Neubauer
  • Patricia B. Munroe
  • Nicholas C. Harvey

Best Publications

  • 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular riskThe Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)

    François Mach;Colin Baigent;Alberico L Catapano;Konstantinos C Koskinas

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

    Frank L J Visseren;François Mach;Yvo M Smulders;David Carballo

  • Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved?

    Olivier Bernard;Alain Lalande;Clement Zotti;Frederick Cervenansky

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease.

    Helmut Baumgartner;Julie De Backer;Sonya V Babu-Narayan;Werner Budts

  • Left ventricular non-compaction - Insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

    Steffen E. Petersen;Joseph B. Selvanayagam;Joseph B. Selvanayagam;Frank Wiesmann;Frank Wiesmann;Matthew D. Robson;Matthew D. Robson

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease.

    Antonio Pelliccia;Sanjay Sharma;Sabiha Gati;Maria Bäck

  • European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2019

    Adam Timmis;Nick Townsend;Chris P Gale;Aleksandra Torbica

  • The UK Biobank imaging enhancement of 100,000 participants: rationale, data collection, management and future directions

    Thomas J. Littlejohns;Jo Holliday;Lorna M. Gibson;Lorna M. Gibson;Steve Garratt

  • Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks

    Wenjia Bai;Matthew Sinclair;Giacomo Tarroni;Ozan Oktay

  • Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging.

    Lucy E. Hudsmith;Steffen E. Petersen;Jane M. Francis;Matthew D. Robson

  • Troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention directly represents the extent of irreversible myocardial injury: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

    Joseph B. Selvanayagam;Italo Porto;Keith Channon;Steffen E. Petersen

  • Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in Caucasians from the UK Biobank population cohort

    Steffen E. Petersen;Nay Aung;Mihir M. Sanghvi;Filip Zemrak

  • Value of delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in predicting myocardial viability after surgical revascularization.

    Joseph B. Selvanayagam;Attila Kardos;Jane M. Francis;Frank Wiesmann

  • Evidence for Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Steffen E. Petersen;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Lucy E. Hudsmith;Matthew D. Robson

  • UK Biobank's cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol.

    Steffen E. Petersen;Paul M. Matthews;Jane M. Francis;Matthew D. Robson

  • Greater risk of severe COVID-19 in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic populations is not explained by cardiometabolic, socioeconomic or behavioural factors, or by 25(OH)-vitamin D status: study of 1326 cases from the UK Biobank.

    Zahra Raisi-Estabragh;Zahra Raisi-Estabragh;Celeste McCracken;Mae S Bethell;Jackie Cooper

  • A review of heart chamber segmentation for structural and functional analysis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

    Peng Peng;Karim Lekadir;Ali Gooya;Ling Shao

  • Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender

    Daniel Augustine;Adam J Lewandowski;Adam J Lewandowski;Merzaka Lazdam;Merzaka Lazdam;Aitzaz Rai

  • Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts

    Tessa S. S Genders;Ewout W Steyerberg;M. G. Myriam Hunink;M. G. Myriam Hunink;Koen Nieman

  • The science of clinical practice: disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about “what is likely to happen” should shape clinical practice

    P Croft;D G Altman;J J Deeks;K M Dunn

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Neubauer
Stefan Neubauer University of Oxford
Stefan K Piechnik
Stefan K Piechnik University of Oxford
James C. Moon
James C. Moon University College London
Nicholas C. Harvey
Nicholas C. Harvey University of Southampton
Matthew D. Robson
Matthew D. Robson University of Oxford
Patricia B. Munroe
Patricia B. Munroe Queen Mary University of London
Hugh Watkins
Hugh Watkins University of Oxford
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Jackie A. Cooper
Jackie A. Cooper University College London
Wenjia Bai
Wenjia Bai Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in health care careers but not ready to commit to medical school, a variety of online programs offer alternative routes into the industry. Many aspiring professionals consider direct entry msn online programs, especially if they hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree and want to transition quickly to advanced nursing roles.

Similarly, online adn programs for non nurses provide a pathway for those looking to start a nursing career without prior health care experience. These flexible programs allow students to earn an Associate Degree in Nursing while balancing other commitments.

If you're interested in administrative roles, the best online medical billing and coding schools offer short-term programs with financial aid options, leading to in-demand jobs in medical records and office management.

Some aspiring nurses may want to avoid standardized entrance exams—fortunately, there are nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams, making the admissions process more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Steffen E. Petersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles