World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
157
Citations
105668
World Ranking
878
National Ranking
499

David A. Bluemke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Bluemke sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,401 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David A. Bluemke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Bluemke sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 157 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Bluemke is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine as well as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. The work also extends into related fields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Immunology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics including:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Radiology
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal

Collaborations with coauthors have been significant with prominent frequent collaborators such as:

  • João A.C. Lima
  • Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh
  • Colin O. Wu
  • Wendy S. Post
  • Théo Pezel

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update, published in 2020 in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Long COVID: post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 with a cardiovascular focus, published in 2022 in the European Heart Journal
  • Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update, published in 2020 in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Evaluation for Myocarditis in Competitive Student Athletes Recovering From Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, published in 2021 in JAMA Cardiology
  • Pericardial Fat and the Risk of Heart Failure, published in 2021 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and Design

    Diane E. Bild;David A. Bluemke;Gregory L. Burke;Robert Detrano

  • Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria

    Frank I. Marcus;William J. McKenna;Duane Sherrill;Cristina Basso

  • Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups.

    Robert Detrano;Alan D. Guerci;J. Jeffrey Carr;Diane E. Bild

  • Forecasting the Impact of Heart Failure in the United States A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

    Paul A. Heidenreich;Nancy M. Albert;Larry A. Allen;David A. Bluemke

  • Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D Flamm

  • Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

    Frank I. Marcus;William J. McKenna;Duane Sherrill;Cristina Basso

  • MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer

    Constance D. Lehman;Constantine Gatsonis;Christiane K. Kuhl;R. Edward Hendrick

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    Nathan Mewton;Chia Ying Liu;Pierre Croisille;David Bluemke;David Bluemke

  • Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

    André Schmidt;Clerio F. Azevedo;Alan Cheng;Sandeep N. Gupta

  • Coronary Artery Calcification Compared With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Incidence : The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Aaron R. Folsom;Richard A. Kronmal;Robert C. Detrano;Daniel H. O’Leary

  • The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study.

    David A. Bluemke;Richard A. Kronmal;João A.C. Lima;Kiang Liu

  • Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans. Validation against three-dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging

    Thor Edvardsen;Bernhard L. Gerber;Jérôme Garot;David Alan Bluemke

  • Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children

    Nadine Kawel-Boehm;Alicia Maceira;Emanuela R Valsangiacomo-Buechel;Jens Vogel-Claussen

  • Differences in the Incidence of Congestive Heart Failure by Ethnicity: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

    Hossein Bahrami;Richard Kronmal;David A. Bluemke;Jean Olson

  • Percent emphysema, airflow obstruction, and impaired left ventricular filling.

    R. Graham Barr;David A. Bluemke;Firas S. Ahmed;J. Jeffery Carr

  • Expert Consensus DocumentACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Late Gadolinium Enhancement by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Heralds an Adverse Prognosis in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

    Katherine C. Wu;Robert G. Weiss;David R. Thiemann;Kakuya Kitagawa

  • Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: Multicenter study

    Mitchell D. Schnall;Jeffrey Blume;David A. Bluemke;Gia A. DeAngelis

  • Cardiovascular imaging for assessing cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic men versus women the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Aditya Jain;Robyn L. McClelland;Joseph F. Polak;Steven Shea

Frequent Co-Authors

Joao A.C. Lima
Joao A.C. Lima Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Hugh Calkins
Hugh Calkins Johns Hopkins University
Richard A. Kronmal
Richard A. Kronmal University of Washington
Ihab R. Kamel
Ihab R. Kamel Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Elliot K. Fishman
Elliot K. Fishman Johns Hopkins University
Steven M. Kawut
Steven M. Kawut University of Pennsylvania
Robyn L. McClelland
Robyn L. McClelland University of Washington
R. Graham Barr
R. Graham Barr Columbia University
Susan R. Heckbert
Susan R. Heckbert University of Washington
Saman Nazarian
Saman Nazarian University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean starting immediately as a physician. Many students explore alternative pathways and online degrees, especially if they want a flexible or accelerated route into healthcare. If you are a registered nurse, upgrading your education can be a smart step. For those looking to advance without clinical placement, there are the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, making it easier to earn your BSN while balancing work or family commitments.

For nurses aiming for doctoral-level leadership roles, you may consider accelerated dnp programs or explore the easiest online dnp programs to help you quickly reach the highest level of clinical practice in nursing. And if you’re just beginning your journey in healthcare, there are convenient online lpn programs that allow you to start working as a nurse in a short time.

Exploring these online degree options can help you map out the best route toward your career goals, from entry-level nursing to advanced practice roles and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Bluemke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles