World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 147 1286 1188 742 675 1491 80106

Elliot K. Fishman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elliot K. Fishman between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elliot K. Fishman published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 37.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 75 publications in 2023. 68 of the 1,801 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 75. Peak 75 publications in 2023. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 14 publications 1984: 19 publications 1985: 17 publications 1986: 30 publications 1987: 41 publications 1988: 31 publications 1989: 46 publications 1990: 35 publications 1991: 34 publications 1992: 25 publications 1993: 31 publications 1994: 32 publications 1995: 31 publications 1996: 23 publications 1997: 38 publications 1998: 44 publications 1999: 33 publications 2000: 48 publications 2001: 49 publications 2002: 41 publications 2003: 45 publications 2004: 34 publications 2005: 33 publications 2006: 45 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 33 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 52 publications 2013: 52 publications 2014: 51 publications 2015: 62 publications 2016: 48 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 56 publications 2019: 48 publications 2020: 66 publications 2021: 54 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 75 publications 2024: 70 publications 2025: 65 publications 2026: 3 publications
1979 2026

1,801 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elliot K. Fishman: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 3
1983 14
1984 19
1985 17
1986 30
1987 41
1988 31
1989 46
1990 35
1991 34
1992 25
1993 31
1994 32
1995 31
1996 23
1997 38
1998 44
1999 33
2000 48
2001 49
2002 41
2003 45
2004 34
2005 33
2006 45
2007 31
2008 34
2009 33
2010 27
2011 33
2012 52
2013 52
2014 51
2015 62
2016 48
2017 54
2018 56
2019 48
2020 66
2021 54
2022 62
2023 75
2024 70
2025 65
2026 3
Total 1,801
Download as CSV

Elliot K. Fishman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot K. Fishman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,481–1,500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,491 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18 1,491
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Elliot K. Fishman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot K. Fishman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 146–147 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 147 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106 147
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elliot K. Fishman is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has a significant publication record primarily in the field of Medicine. Their subfields of study include Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Media in Health Education
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention," published in 2020 in Science.
  • "Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer," published in 2021 in Pancreas.
  • "Differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with CT radiomics features," published in 2020 in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging.
  • "3D genomic mapping reveals multifocality of human pancreatic precancers," published in 2024 in Nature.
  • "The first use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the ER: triage not diagnosis," published in 2020 in Emergency Radiology.

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated closely with the scientist include:

  • Linda C. Chu
  • Steven P. Rowe
  • Edmund M. Weisberg
  • Ralph H. Hruban
  • Satomi Kawamoto

The scientist's publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Radiology
  • Radiology Case Reports
  • Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
  • Emergency Radiology
  • Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging

Best Publications

  • The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design

    Constantine A. Gatsonis;Denise R. Aberle;Christine D. Berg;William C. Black

  • Recent Progress in Pancreatic Cancer

    Christopher L. Wolfgang;Joseph M. Herman;Daniel A. Laheru;Alison P. Klein

  • Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement.

    Mark P. Callery;Kenneth J. Chang;Elliot K. Fishman;Mark S. Talamonti

  • Prevalence of Unsuspected Pancreatic Cysts on MDCT

    Thomas A. Laffan;Karen M. Horton;Alison P. Klein;Bruce Berlanstein

  • The management of renal angiomyolipoma.

    Joseph E. Oesterling;Elliot K. Fishman;Stanford M. Goldman;Fray F. Marshall

  • Three-dimensional Volume Rendering of Spiral CT Data: Theory and Method

    Paul S. Calhoun;Brian S. Kuszyk;David G. Heath;Jennifer C. Carley

  • Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Radiology Reporting Template: Consensus Statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association

    Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary;Isaac R. Francis;Suresh T. Chari;Elliot K. Fishman

  • Frequent Detection of Pancreatic Lesions in Asymptomatic High-Risk Individuals

    Marcia Irene Canto;Ralph H. Hruban;Elliot K. Fishman;Ihab R. Kamel

  • The Natural History of Renal Angiomyolipoma

    Mitchell S. Steiner;Stanford M. Goldman;Elliot K. Fishman;Fray F. Marshall

  • Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in acute leukemia: characteristic findings on CT, the CT halo sign, and the role of CT in early diagnosis.

    J E Kuhlman;E K Fishman;S S Siegelman

  • Solitary pulmonary nodules: CT assessment.

    S S Siegelman;N F Khouri;F P Leo;E K Fishman

  • The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography.

    Yeo Cj;Bastidas Ja;Lynch-Nyhan A;Fishman Ek

  • Patterns, Timing, and Predictors of Recurrence Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

    Vincent P. Groot;Neda Rezaee;Wenchuan Wu;John L. Cameron

  • CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease.

    Karen M. Horton;Frank M. Corl;Elliot K. Fishman

  • Screening for pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals: an EUS-based approach

    Marcia Irene Canto;Michael Goggins;Charles J. Yeo;Constance Griffin

  • Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: Evaluation with CT Angiography

    Karen M. Horton;Mark A. Talamini;Elliot K. Fishman

  • Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium

    Michael Goggins;Kasper Alexander Overbeek;Randall Brand;Sapna Syngal

  • Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention

    Anne Marie Lennon;Adam H. Buchanan;Isaac Kinde;Andrew Warren

  • Loss-of-function mutations in TGFB2 cause a syndromic presentation of thoracic aortic aneurysm

    Mark E. Lindsay;Dorien Schepers;Nikhita Ajit Bolar;Jefferson J. Doyle

  • Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why

    Elliot K. Fishman;Derek R. Ney;David G. Heath;Frank M. Corl

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph H. Hruban
Ralph H. Hruban Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Stanley S. Siegelman
Stanley S. Siegelman Johns Hopkins University
Christopher L. Wolfgang
Christopher L. Wolfgang New York University
David A. Bluemke
David A. Bluemke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Matthew J. Weiss
Matthew J. Weiss Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ihab R. Kamel
Ihab R. Kamel Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John L. Cameron
John L. Cameron Johns Hopkins University
Marcia I. Canto
Marcia I. Canto Johns Hopkins University
Richard D. Schulick
Richard D. Schulick University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Michael Goggins
Michael Goggins Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Medicine in the USA but want to explore alternative or complementary careers, there are many flexible options available online. For those seeking a direct patient care track, you might consider nursing programs. Prospective students often search for whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to find pathways with less competitive admission processes.

Some nursing schools even offer admission without standardized test requirements. If this sounds appealing, you can research a nursing school that doesn't require teas to broaden your options.

If you're more interested in the administrative or office side of healthcare, there are accredited online medical billing and coding with financial aid options to help you enter this growing field affordably.

Lastly, those who aspire to manage clinics or healthcare organizations may find interest in healthcare administration programs that accelerate your journey toward leadership roles. Consider these paths to find the best fit for your medical and healthcare career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Elliot K. Fishman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles