World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
21462
World Ranking
16762
National Ranking
8410

Frank H. Miller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank H. Miller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank H. Miller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank H. Miller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank H. Miller is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical fields related to radiology, hepatology, and surgery. The main field of study is Medicine, with a significant number of publications in subfields such as Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Hepatology.

The scientist's work covers several specialized topics, including:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation

Their recent published papers highlight a focus on imaging, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatobiliary diseases and malignancies. Notable works include:

  • "Evolution of Radioembolization in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pictorial Review" (2021), published in Radiographics
  • "Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Malignancy: Assessment, Guidelines, and the Field Defect" (2021), published in Radiographics

Other important papers from the broader field connected to their research include:

  • "Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron Evaluation with MRI and Fibrosis and Fat Evaluation with US: A Practical Guide for Radiologists" (2023), published in Radiographics
  • "Reporting standards for primary sclerosing cholangitis using MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography: guidelines from MR Working Group of the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group" (2021), published in European Radiology
  • "Gallbladder Carcinoma and Its Differential Diagnosis at MRI: What Radiologists Should Know" (2020), published in Radiographics

The frequent coauthors that have collaborated extensively with the scientist are:

  • Camila Lopes Vendrami
  • Amir A. Borhani
  • Jeanne M. Horowitz
  • Ulaş Bağcı
  • Rajesh N. Keswani

The most common venues for publishing research include:

  • Abdominal Radiology
  • Radiographics
  • Advances in Clinical Radiology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Radiologic Clinics of North America

Best Publications

  • Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using Yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive report of long-term outcomes.

    Riad Salem;Robert J. Lewandowski;Mary F. Mulcahy;Ahsun Riaz

  • Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Radiology Reporting Template: Consensus Statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association

    Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary;Isaac R. Francis;Suresh T. Chari;Elliot K. Fishman

  • Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Riad Salem;Robert J. Lewandowski;Laura Kulik;Edward Wang

  • A Comparative Analysis of Transarterial Downstaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization

    R. J. Lewandowski;L. M. Kulik;A. Riaz;S. Senthilnathan

  • Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

    Riad Salem;Andrew C. Gordon;Samdeep Mouli;Ryan Hickey

  • Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Staging Liver Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

    Siddharth Singh;Sudhakar K. Venkatesh;Zhen Wang;Frank H. Miller

  • CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

    Richard M. Gore;Emil J. Balthazar;Gary G. Ghahremani;Frank H. Miller

  • American Pancreatic Association practice guidelines in chronic pancreatitis evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines

    Darwin L. Conwell;Linda S. Lee;Dhiraj Yadav;Daniel S. Longnecker

  • Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres.

    Ahsun Riaz;Laura Kulik;Robert J. Lewandowski;Robert K. Ryu

  • Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis

    Siddharth Singh;Sudhakar K Venkatesh;Rohit Loomba;Zhen Wang

  • Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging.

    Yi Wang;Daniel R. Ganger;Josh Levitsky;Laura A. Sternick

  • Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.

    Douglas L. Brown;Peter M. Doubilet;Frank H Miller;Mary C. Frates

  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain--suspected appendicitis.

    Max P. Rosen;Alexander Ding;Michael A. Blake;Mark E. Baker

  • Unresectable chemorefractory liver metastases: radioembolization with 90Y microspheres--safety, efficacy, and survival.

    Kent T. Sato;Robert J. Lewandowski;Mary F. Mulcahy;Bassel Atassi

  • Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with MR Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Pancreatitis

    Gregory T. Sica;John Braver;Michael J. Cooney;Michael J. Cooney;Frank H. Miller;Frank H. Miller

  • Alpha-Fetoprotein Response After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Oncologic Marker of Radiologic Response, Progression, and Survival

    Ahsun Riaz;Robert K. Ryu;Laura M. Kulik;Mary F. Mulcahy

  • Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatic lesions

    Frank H. Miller;Nancy Hammond;Aheed J. Siddiqi;Sagar Shroff

  • Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Solid and Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas

    Wang Y;Miller Fh;Chen Ze;Merrick L

  • Institutional decision to adopt Y90 as primary treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma informed by a 1,000-patient 15-year experience

    Riad Salem;Ahmed Gabr;Ahsun Riaz;Ronald Mora

  • Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Ahsun Riaz;Frank H. Miller;Laura M. Kulik;Paul Nikolaidis

Frequent Co-Authors

Riad Salem
Riad Salem Northwestern University
Robert J. Lewandowski
Robert J. Lewandowski Northwestern University
Mary F. Mulcahy
Mary F. Mulcahy Northwestern University
Michael Abecassis
Michael Abecassis University of Arizona
Al B. Benson
Al B. Benson Northwestern University
Yi Wang
Yi Wang Cornell University
Richard L. Ehman
Richard L. Ehman Mayo Clinic
Brooks D. Cash
Brooks D. Cash The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Dushyant V. Sahani
Dushyant V. Sahani University of Washington
Teresa K. Woodruff
Teresa K. Woodruff Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a doctor. The U.S. healthcare sector offers diverse pathways, many of which are accessible through flexible online degrees. For those interested in leadership roles, the cheapest master's in healthcare administration programs provide a cost-effective route to management positions in hospitals and clinics.

Advancing clinical knowledge is also possible online. The cheapest dnp program options allow nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice affordably, boosting career potential and specialty training. Aspiring pharmacists can consider the 3-year online pharmd degree—a flexible way to meet licensure requirements while balancing work and study.

For those interested in the data and administrative side of medicine, a health information management degree online can open doors to in-demand roles in medical coding, health data analysis, and record management. Each of these online pathways can accelerate your entry into high-growth medical careers—often at a lower cost and with added flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Frank H. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles