World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
9843
World Ranking
16191
National Ranking
1278

Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 116 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these domains, they have contributed extensively to Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Biochemistry.

The scientist's main research topics include Plant Reproductive Biology, Plant Molecular Biology Research, Plant and animal studies, Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms, Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies.

Franklin-Tong has published in several scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Current Biology
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Nature Plants

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Evolution of self-compatibility by a mutant Sm-RNase in citrus (2020, Nature Plants)
  • Contrasting self-recognition rejection systems for self-incompatibility in Brassica and Papaver (2023, Current Biology)
  • Ectopic Expression of a Self-Incompatibility Module Triggers Growth Arrest and Cell Death in Vegetative Cells (2020, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY)
  • New opportunities and insights into Papaver self-incompatibility by imaging engineered Arabidopsis pollen (2020, Journal of Experimental Botany)
  • Self-incompatibility requires GPI anchor remodeling by the poppy PGAP1 ortholog HLD1 (2022, Current Biology)

Collaborations have been an important aspect of their scientific work. The most frequent co-authors include:

  • Maurice Bosch
  • Zongcheng Lin
  • Marina Muñoz Triviño
  • Moritz K. Nowack
  • Ludi Wang

The scope of Franklin-Tong's work spans studies on self-incompatibility mechanisms in plants, molecular pathways influencing cell growth, and diverse aspects of plant reproductive biology and molecular biology research.

Best Publications

  • Morphological classification of plant cell deaths.

    W G van Doorn;E P Beers;J L Dangl;V E Franklin-Tong

  • Signaling and the modulation of pollen tube growth

    Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

  • Unravelling response‐specificity in Ca2+ signalling pathways in plant cells

    Jason J. Rudd;Vernonica E. Franklin‐Tong

  • Growth of Pollen Tubes of Papaver rhoeas Is Regulated by a Slow-Moving Calcium Wave Propagated by Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate.

    Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong;Bjorn K. Drobak;Andrew C. Allan;Peter A. C. Watkins

  • Self-incompatibility triggers programmed cell death in Papaver pollen.

    Steven G. Thomas;Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

  • Cloning and expression of a distinctive class of self-incompatibility (S) gene from Papaver rhoeas L.

    H C Foote;J P Ride;V E Franklin-Tong;E A Walker

  • The self‐incompatibility response in Papaver rhoeas is mediated by cytosolic free calcium

    Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong;Jon P. Ride;Nick D. Read;Anthony J. Trewavas

  • A role for actin in regulating apoptosis/programmed cell death: evidence spanning yeast, plants and animals.

    Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong;Campbell W. Gourlay

  • Gametophytic self-incompatibility: understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in “self” pollen tube inhibition

    Bruce A. McClure;Vernonica Franklin-Tong

  • Signal-Mediated Depolymerization of Actin in Pollen during the Self-Incompatibility Response

    Benjamin N. Snowman;David R. Kovar;Galina Shevchenko;Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

  • Pollination in species with dry stigmas: the nature of the early stigmatic response and the pathway taken by pollen tubes

    C. J. Elleman;V. Franklin-Tong;H. G. Dickinson

  • Alterations in the Actin Cytoskeleton of Pollen Tubes Are Induced by the Self-Incompatibility Reaction in Papaver rhoeas

    Anja Geitmann;Benjamin N. Snowman;Anne Mie C. Emons;Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

  • Actin depolymerization is sufficient to induce programmed cell death in self-incompatible pollen

    Steven G. Thomas;Shanjin Huang;Shutian Li;Christopher J. Staiger

  • Self-incompatibility in flowering plants : evolution, diversity, and mechanisms

    Vernonica E Franklin-Tong

  • Regulation of actin dynamics by actin-binding proteins in pollen

    Christopher J. Staiger;Natalie S. Poulter;Jessica L. Henty;Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

  • Ratio‐imaging of Ca2+i in the self‐incompatibility response in pollen tubes of Papaver rhoeas

    Vernonica E. Franklin‐Tong;Grant Hackett;Peter K. Hepler

  • Reactive Oxygen Species and Nitric Oxide Mediate Actin Reorganization and Programmed Cell Death in the Self-Incompatibility Response of Papaver

    Katie A. Wilkins;James Bancroft;Maurice Bosch;Jennifer Ings

  • Temporal and spatial activation of caspase-like enzymes induced by self-incompatibility in Papaver pollen.

    Maurice Bosch;Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

  • Increased Phosphorylation of a 26-kD Pollen Protein Is Induced by the Self-incompatibility Response in Papaver rhoeas

    J. J. Rudd;F. C. H. Franklin;J. M. Lord;V. E. Franklin-Tong

  • The role of the actin cytoskeleton in plant cell signaling

    B. K. Drøbak;V. E. Franklin-Tong;C. J. Staiger

Frequent Co-Authors

F. Christopher H. Franklin
F. Christopher H. Franklin University of Birmingham
Anja Geitmann
Anja Geitmann McGill University
Christopher J. Staiger
Christopher J. Staiger Purdue University West Lafayette
Anne Mie C. Emons
Anne Mie C. Emons Wageningen University & Research
Anthony Trewavas
Anthony Trewavas University of Edinburgh
Andrew C. Allan
Andrew C. Allan Plant & Food Research
Shanjin Huang
Shanjin Huang Tsinghua University
Peter K. Hepler
Peter K. Hepler University of Massachusetts Amherst
Yongbiao Xue
Yongbiao Xue Chinese Academy of Sciences
Peter Shaw
Peter Shaw Norwich Research Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a range of healthcare and science-related fields. Many students today are seeking efficient ways to advance their qualifications, and online education is playing an increasingly important role in this journey.

For example, if you are interested in mental health, you may want to explore pmhnp online programs that allow you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. Those with a master’s degree in nursing might prefer the cheapest post master's fnp program to train as a Family Nurse Practitioner without incurring high costs.

Students interested in nutrition sciences can benefit from an accelerated nutrition degree online, which provides a fast path to a rewarding career in dietetics. Additionally, those who are Registered Nurses can upgrade their credentials through the cheapest rn to bsn online options, streamlining their academic journey.

Whether your focus is in clinical or research-based roles, there are flexible online programs designed to meet your educational needs while leading toward fulfilling career pathways in the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Vernonica E. Franklin-Tong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles