World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
8740
World Ranking
5020
National Ranking
1719

Scott R. Loss publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Loss sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 111 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Scott R. Loss D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Loss sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott R. Loss is affiliated with Oklahoma State University in the United States and specializes in research within the field of Environmental Science. Their work covers various subfields including Ecology, Infectious Diseases, Global and Planetary Change, Parasitology, and Ecological Modeling.

Their research primarily revolves around topics related to avian ecology and behavior, wildlife ecology and conservation, viral infections and vectors, species distribution and climate change, vector-borne infectious diseases, wildlife-road interactions and conservation, and human-animal interaction studies.

Some of the recent notable papers by Scott R. Loss include:

  • A meta-analysis of the influence of anthropogenic noise on terrestrial wildlife communication strategies, 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Review and synthesis of the global literature on domestic cat impacts on wildlife, 2022, Journal of Animal Ecology
  • Limitations, lack of standardization, and recommended best practices in studies of renewable energy effects on birds and bats, 2020, Conservation Biology
  • Correlates of bird collisions with buildings across three North American countries, 2020, Conservation Biology
  • Estimates of wildlife killed by free-ranging cats in China, 2020, Biological Conservation

Scott R. Loss frequently collaborates with colleagues including Bruce H. Noden, Timothy J. O'Connell, Ellen P. Robertson, Jared A. Elmore, and David W. Londe.

The scientist has published multiple papers in key academic venues such as Ornithological Applications, Biological Conservation, Journal of Medical Entomology, Journal of Applied Ecology, and Conservation Biology.

Best Publications

  • The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States

    Scott R. Loss;Tom Will;Peter P. Marra

  • A call for full annual cycle research in animal ecology.

    Peter P. Marra;Emily B. Cohen;Scott R. Loss;Jordan E. Rutter

  • Bird–building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability

    Scott R. Loss;Tom Will;Sara S. Loss;Peter P. Marra

  • Global distribution of earthworm diversity

    Helen R P Phillips;Carlos A Guerra;Marie L C Bartz;Maria J I Briones

  • Host Selection by Culex pipiens Mosquitoes and West Nile Virus Amplification

    Gabriel L. Hamer;Uriel D. Kitron;Tony L. Goldberg;Jeffrey D. Brawn

  • Direct Mortality of Birds from Anthropogenic Causes

    Scott R. Loss;Tom Will;Peter P. Marra

  • Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States

    Scott R. Loss;Tom Will;Peter P. Marra

  • Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae): a bridge vector of West Nile virus to humans.

    Gabriel L. Hamer;Uriel D. Kitron;Jeffrey D. Brawn;Scott R. Loss

  • Assisted colonization: Integrating conservation strategies in the face of climate change

    Scott R. Loss;Lauren A. Terwilliger;Anna C. Peterson;Anna C. Peterson

  • Relationships between avian diversity, neighborhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape

    Scott R. Loss;Marilyn O. Ruiz;Jeffrey D. Brawn

  • Estimation of Bird-Vehicle Collision Mortality on U.S. Roads

    Scott R. Loss;Tom Will;Peter P. Marra

  • Refining estimates of bird collision and electrocution mortality at power lines in the United States.

    Scott R. Loss;Tom Will;Peter P. Marra

  • The unseen invaders: introduced earthworms as drivers of change in plant communities in North American forests (a meta-analysis)

    Dylan Craven;Madhav P. Thakur;Erin K. Cameron;Erin K. Cameron;Lee E. Frelich

  • Population impacts of free‐ranging domestic cats on mainland vertebrates

    Scott R Loss;Peter P Marra

  • Direct human-caused mortality of birds: improving quantification of magnitude and assessment of population impact

    Scott R Loss;Tom Will;Peter P Marra

  • Fine-Scale Variation in Vector Host Use and Force of Infection Drive Localized Patterns of West Nile Virus Transmission

    Gabriel L. Hamer;Gabriel L. Hamer;Luis Fernando Chaves;Luis Fernando Chaves;Tavis K. Anderson;Uriel D. Kitron

  • Rapid amplification of West Nile virus: the role of hatch-year birds.

    Gabriel L. Hamer;Edward D. Walker;Jeffrey D. Brawn;Scott R. Loss

  • Wild birds and urban ecology of ticks and tick-borne pathogens, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2005-2010.

    Sarah A. Hamer;Tony L. Goldberg;Uriel D. Kitron;Jeffrey D. Brawn

  • Avian host community structure and prevalence of West Nile virus in Chicago, Illinois

    Scott R. Loss;Scott R. Loss;Gabriel L. Hamer;Edward D. Walker;Marilyn O. Ruiz

  • Side‐swiped: ecological cascades emanating from earthworm invasions

    Lee E Frelich;Bernd Blossey;Erin K Cameron;Erin K Cameron;Andrea Dávalos;Andrea Dávalos

  • Fine-scale genetic variation and evolution of West Nile Virus in a transmission “hot spot” in suburban Chicago, USA

    Luigi Bertolotti;Uriel D. Kitron;Edward D. Walker;Marilyn O. Ruiz

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter P. Marra
Peter P. Marra Georgetown University
Jeffrey D. Brawn
Jeffrey D. Brawn University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Uriel Kitron
Uriel Kitron Emory University
Tony L. Goldberg
Tony L. Goldberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
Edward D. Walker
Edward D. Walker Michigan State University
Todd E. Katzner
Todd E. Katzner United States Geological Survey
Nico Eisenhauer
Nico Eisenhauer Leipzig University
Bernd Blossey
Bernd Blossey Cornell University
Douglas H. Johnson
Douglas H. Johnson United States Geological Survey
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to numerous online degree and career opportunities in related fields. For those interested in understanding humanity’s past and its relationship to the environment, consider exploring the best online master's in history programs. These programs can deepen your knowledge of historical environmental changes and their impacts.

If you are passionate about data, archives, or research support, an affordable library science degree online could be a valuable option. This pathway is ideal for those wanting to manage digital collections or environmental information resources.

For students interested in applying communication skills to science, asha accredited slp programs provide training in speech-language pathology, expanding opportunities to work in science outreach or supporting communication for individuals in science-related settings.

Finally, if your undergraduate degree is not in communication sciences but you want to shift into this field, slp bridge program options allow you to qualify for graduate study without starting from scratch.

Best Scientists Citing Scott R. Loss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles