World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard L. Ehman

Richard L. Ehman

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
46284
World Ranking
4756
National Ranking
2578

Richard L. Ehman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Ehman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 532 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard L. Ehman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Ehman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 2010 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2001 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Richard L. Ehman is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States, where their research has extensively contributed to medical science, particularly in the field of liver disease diagnosis and imaging.

Their recent publications include significant work in magnetic resonance elastography and liver disease. Notable papers include:

  • MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology (2020, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine)
  • Liver Stiffness by Magnetic Resonance Elastography Predicts Future Cirrhosis, Decompensation, and Death in NAFLD (2020, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
  • An individual patient data meta-analysis to determine cut-offs for and confounders of NAFLD-fibrosis staging with magnetic resonance elastography (2023, Journal of Hepatology)
  • Magnetic resonance elastography for prediction of long-term progression and outcome in chronic liver disease: A retrospective study (2021, Hepatology)
  • Radiological Society of North America/Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Shear Wave Speed Bias Quantification in Elastic and Viscoelastic Phantoms (2021, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard L. Ehman include:

  • Armando Manduca
  • Meng Yin
  • Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
  • Matthew C. Murphy
  • John Huston

The primary venues for their publications reflect a focus on imaging and hepatology, including:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • European Radiology
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Hepatology

Richard L. Ehman's research spans the main field of Medicine, with subfields concentrated in:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Epidemiology
  • Hepatology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgery

Their main research topics include:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Liver Diseases and Immunity

The scientist has received several recognitions, including:

  • Fellow, National Academy of Inventors (2016)
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (2010)
  • Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (2001)

Best Publications

  • Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity

    Armando Manduca;Travis E. Oliphant;M. A. Dresner;J. L. Mahowald

  • Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis With Magnetic Resonance Elastography

    Meng Yin;Jayant A. Talwalkar;Kevin J. Glaser;Armando Manduca

  • Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures.

    R L Ehman;J P Felmlee

  • Magnetic resonance elastography: A review

    Yogesh K. Mariappan;Kevin J. Glaser;Richard L. Ehman

  • Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications.

    Sudhakar K. Venkatesh;Meng Yin;Richard L. Ehman

  • Respiratory motion of the heart: kinematics and the implications for the spatial resolution in coronary imaging

    Yi Wang;Stephen J. Riederer;Richard L. Ehman

  • Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Staging Liver Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

    Siddharth Singh;Sudhakar K. Venkatesh;Zhen Wang;Frank H. Miller

  • MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results.

    Olivier Rouvière;Meng Yin;M. Alex Dresner;Phillip J. Rossman

  • Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain

    Scott A. Kruse;Gregory H. Rose;Kevin J. Glaser;Armando Manduca

  • MR Elastography of Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results

    Alexia L. McKnight;Jennifer L. Kugel;Phillip J. Rossman;Armando Manduca

  • Navigator-echo-based real-time respiratory gating and triggering for reduction of respiration effects in three-dimensional coronary MR angiography.

    Yi Wang;Phillip J. Rossman;Roger C. Grimm;Stephen J. Riederer

  • Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography.

    Jun Chen;Jayant A. Talwalkar;Meng Yin;Kevin J. Glaser

  • Magnetic resonance elastography predicts advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study.

    Rohit Loomba;Tanya Wolfson;Brandon Ang;Jonathan Hooker

  • Sensory motor cortex: correlation of presurgical mapping with functional MR imaging and invasive cortical mapping.

    C R Jack;R M Thompson;R K Butts;F W Sharbrough

  • Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: preliminary results.

    S A Kruse;J A Smith;A J Lawrence;M A Dresner

  • Complex-valued stiffness reconstruction for magnetic resonance elastography by algebraic inversion of the differential equation

    Travis E. Oliphant;Armando Manduca;Richard L. Ehman;James F. Greenleaf

  • Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography.

    Matthew C. Murphy;John Huston;Clifford R. Jack;Kevin J. Glaser

  • Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy.

    F Earnest;P J Kelly;B W Scheithauer;B A Kall

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic fibrosis: emerging clinical applications

    Jayant A. Talwalkar;Meng Yin;Jeff L. Fidler;Schuyler O. Sanderson

  • Spatial presaturation: a method for suppressing flow artifacts and improving depiction of vascular anatomy in MR imaging.

    J P Felmlee;R L Ehman

Frequent Co-Authors

Armando Manduca
Armando Manduca Mayo Clinic
John Huston
John Huston Mayo Clinic
Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
Kai Nan An
Kai Nan An Mayo Clinic
Claude B. Sirlin
Claude B. Sirlin University of California, San Diego
Yi Wang
Yi Wang Cornell University
Frank H. Miller
Frank H. Miller Northwestern University
Rolf D. Hubmayr
Rolf D. Hubmayr Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers doesn’t always mean becoming a physician. Many rewarding roles support patient care and the healthcare system. For example, a health care administration degree offers a pathway to leadership and management positions in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. With flexible online options, these programs provide skills in finance, policy, and health resource management.

Nurses seeking to advance their careers can consider adn to fnp programs. These bridge programs are designed for registered nurses who hold an Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) and wish to become Family Nurse Practitioners (FNP), allowing them to earn a master’s degree while continuing to work.

Nutrition and wellness careers are also growing rapidly. Pursuing an online degree in nutrition can lead to work in dietetics, health education, or community wellness. These programs provide a science-based foundation for improving health at individual and population levels.

Before selecting a healthcare administration program, it’s crucial to understand how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Look for accredited programs, curriculum strength, and career outcomes to ensure your education aligns with industry standards and future job markets.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Ehman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles