World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17717 16652 8844 8174 300 19378

John Huston publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Huston between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Huston published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2024. 58 of the 393 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2024. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 22 publications
1987 2025

393 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Huston: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 5
1997 2
1998 4
1999 7
2000 7
2001 5
2002 6
2003 7
2004 8
2005 8
2006 5
2007 7
2008 9
2009 11
2010 6
2011 8
2012 10
2013 10
2014 15
2015 19
2016 20
2017 18
2018 24
2019 16
2020 26
2021 22
2022 11
2023 26
2024 36
2025 22
Total 393
Download as CSV

John Huston publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Huston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 300 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 300
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John Huston D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Huston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Huston is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has an extensive research profile primarily in the field of medicine, with a focus on radiology, neurology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their scholarly contributions cover a range of topics linked to advanced imaging techniques and cerebrovascular diseases.

The scientist has published 266 works in medicine, with significant emphasis on the following subfields: radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging; neurology; pulmonary and respiratory medicine; cellular and molecular neuroscience; and biomedical engineering.

Their main research topics include advanced MRI techniques and applications, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus, ultrasound imaging and elastography, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, cardiovascular health and disease prevention, and traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances.

Important publication venues where John Huston's work frequently appears are:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology
  • Stroke
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Huston include:

  • Richard L. Ehman
  • Matthew C. Murphy
  • Joshua D. Trzasko
  • Yunhong Shu
  • Matt A. Bernstein

Recent notable papers authored or coauthored by John Huston are:

  • Long-term remission, relapses and maintenance therapy in adult primary central nervous system vasculitis: A single-center 35-year experience (2020, Autoimmunity Reviews)
  • Prevalence and Heterogeneity of Cerebrovascular Disease Imaging Lesions (2020, Mayo Clinic Proceedings)
  • Identification of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus by Disease-Specific Patterns of Brain Stiffness and Damping Ratio (2020, Investigative Radiology)
  • MRI and tractography techniques to localize the ventral intermediate nucleus and dentatorubrothalamic tract for deep brain stimulation and MR-guided focused ultrasound: a narrative review and update (2020, Neurosurgical FOCUS)
  • Harnessing brain waves: a review of brain magnetic resonance elastography for clinicians and scientists entering the field (2021, British Journal of Radiology)

Best Publications

  • Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients.

    Timothy J. Kaufmann;John Huston;Jay N. Mandrekar;Cathy D. Schleck

  • Primary central nervous system vasculitis: analysis of 101 patients.

    Carlo Salvarani;Robert D. Brown;Kenneth T. Calamia;Teresa J. H. Christianson

  • Effect of a Novel Free Radical Scavenger, Edaravone (MCI-186), on Acute Brain Infarction

    Wolfgang Müllges;Dorothea Franke;Wilko Reents;Jörg Babin-Ebell

  • Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography.

    Matthew C. Murphy;John Huston;Clifford R. Jack;Kevin J. Glaser

  • Initial clinical experience in MR imaging of the brain with a fast fluid- attenuated inversion-recovery pulse sequence

    J N Rydberg;C A Hammond;R C Grimm;B J Erickson

  • Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability

    Waleed Brinjikji;John Huston;Alejandro A. Rabinstein;Gyeong Moon Kim

  • Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.

    Matt A. Bernstein;John Huston;Heidi A. Ward

  • High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.

    Matt A. Bernstein;John Huston;Chen Lin;Gordon F. Gibbs

  • Intracranial aneurysms in patients with coarctation of the aorta: a prospective magnetic resonance angiographic study of 100 patients.

    Heidi M. Connolly;John Huston;Robert D. Brown;Carole A. Warnes

  • Aspirin as a promising agent for decreasing incidence of cerebral aneurysm rupture

    David M. Hasan;Kelly B. Mahaney;Robert D. Brown;Irene Meissner

  • Clinical profile of autosomal dominant polycystic liver disease

    Qi Qian;Airong Li;Bernard F. King;Patrick S. Kamath

  • Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults.

    Arvin Arani;Matthew C. Murphy;Kevin J. Glaser;Armando Manduca

  • Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow at the cerebral aqueduct by use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: technique validation and utility in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

    Patrick H. Luetmer;John Huston;Jonathan A. Friedman;Geoffrey R. Dixon

  • Greater Rupture Risk for Familial as Compared to Sporadic Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

    Joseph P. Broderick;Robert D. Brown;Laura Sauerbeck;Richard Hornung

  • VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS IN AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE

    John Huston;Vicente E. Torres;Patrick P. Sulivan;Kenneth P. Offord

  • Intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations: comparison of time-of-flight and phase-contrast MR angiography.

    John Huston;Daniel A. Rufenacht;Richard L. Ehman;David O. Wiebers

  • Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction

    Yi Wang;Donald L. Johnston;Jerome F. Breen;John Huston

  • Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US.

    John Huston;Bradley D. Lewis;David O. Wiebers;Fredric B. Meyer

  • Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the human brain: technique, findings and clinical applications.

    Lucy Hiscox;Curtis L Johnson;Eric Barnhill;Matt Dj McGarry;Matt Dj McGarry

  • Lessons learned from whole exome sequencing in multiplex families affected by a complex genetic disorder, intracranial aneurysm

    Janice L. Farlow;Hai Lin;Laura Sauerbeck;Dongbing Lai

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert D. Brown
Robert D. Brown Mayo Clinic
Richard L. Ehman
Richard L. Ehman Mayo Clinic
Armando Manduca
Armando Manduca Mayo Clinic
Giuseppe Lanzino
Giuseppe Lanzino Mayo Clinic
Carlo Salvarani
Carlo Salvarani University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Gene G. Hunder
Gene G. Hunder Mayo Clinic
Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
James F. Meschia
James F. Meschia Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine isn’t the only route to a rewarding healthcare career. Many students explore related fields through flexible online programs that offer specialized knowledge and diverse pathways. For those interested in patient care without entrance exam hurdles, consider nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi. These options can help you begin your nursing journey quickly and conveniently.

If you prefer leadership roles, a healthcare administration online degree provides essential skills for managing healthcare facilities and navigating the business side of medicine. Nurses looking to advance their careers might explore adn to np bridge programs, which offer accelerated routes to becoming a nurse practitioner.

For those interested in food science and wellness, the best online nutrition degree programs can open doors to careers in dietetics, public health, and clinical nutrition. These alternative degrees provide flexible paths to making a significant impact in the healthcare sector—even if medical school isn’t the right fit.

Best Scientists Citing John Huston

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles