World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gabriel J.E. Rinkel

Gabriel J.E. Rinkel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 122 3427 3197 127 123 597 67530

Gabriel J.E. Rinkel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gabriel J.E. Rinkel between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gabriel J.E. Rinkel published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 16 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2015. 42 of the 688 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2015. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 33 publications 2006: 33 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 42 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 46 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 23 publications
1983 2025

688 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gabriel J.E. Rinkel: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 5
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 13
1996 6
1997 11
1998 10
1999 8
2000 9
2001 7
2002 21
2003 22
2004 19
2005 33
2006 33
2007 18
2008 42
2009 31
2010 30
2011 22
2012 22
2013 26
2014 26
2015 46
2016 24
2017 18
2018 23
2019 31
2020 18
2021 16
2022 23
2023 23
2024 19
2025 23
Total 688
Download as CSV

Gabriel J.E. Rinkel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriel J.E. Rinkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 597 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 597
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gabriel J.E. Rinkel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriel J.E. Rinkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 122–123 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255 122
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gabriel J.E. Rinkel is a researcher affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a substantial focus on Neurology. Additional subfields of study include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Epidemiology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to neurovascular health and cerebrovascular diseases. Key topics of their work include:

  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Their publication record includes contributions to several prominent journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • European Stroke Journal
  • Neurology
  • Stroke
  • Brain and Spine
  • The Lancet Neurology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysms identifies 17 risk loci and genetic overlap with clinical risk factors, 2020, Nature Genetics
  • Ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid haemorrhage (ULTRA): a randomised controlled trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, 2022, European Stroke Journal
  • Apixaban versus no anticoagulation after anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation in the Netherlands (APACHE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial, 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • Risk of Rupture After Intracranial Aneurysm Growth, 2021, JAMA Neurology

Gabriel J.E. Rinkel has collaborated extensively with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen
  • Ynte M. Ruigrok
  • Nima Etminan
  • Irene C. van der Schaaf
  • Catharina J.M. Klijn

Best Publications

  • Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Charlotte Jj van Asch;Merel Ja Luitse;Gabriël Je Rinkel;Ingeborg van der Tweel

  • Unruptured intracranial aneurysms - Risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention

    D. Wiebers;J. Whisnant;G. Forbes;I. Meissner

  • European Stroke Organization Guidelines for the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

    Thorsten Steiner;Seppo Juvela;Andreas Unterberg;Carla Jung

  • Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Monique Hm Vlak;Ale Algra;Raya Brandenburg;Gabriël Je Rinkel

  • Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management

    J. van Gijn;G. J. E. Rinkel

  • Definition of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage as an Outcome Event in Clinical Trials and Observational Studies Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group

    Mervyn D.I. Vergouwen;Marinus Vermeulen;Jan van Gijn;Gabriel J.E. Rinkel

  • Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis.

    Dennis J Nieuwkamp;Larissa E Setz;Ale Algra;Francisca H H Linn

  • Case-Fatality Rates and Functional Outcome After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage A Systematic Review

    Jeannette W. Hop;Gabriël J.E. Rinkel;Ale Algra;Jan van Gijn

  • Incidence of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends

    N. K. de Rooij;F. H. H. Linn;J. A. van der Plas;A. Algra

  • Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies.

    Jacoba P Greving;Marieke J H Wermer;Robert D Brown;Akio Morita;Akio Morita

  • Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage: an updated systematic review of epidemiological studies.

    Valery L. Feigin;Gabriel J.E. Rinkel;Carlene M.M. Lawes;Ale Algra

  • European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management-update 2003.

    Gunnel E. Carlsson;Anders Möller;Christian Blomstrand;Takashi Ueda

  • Incidence of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Role of Region, Year, and Rate of Computed Tomography: A Meta-Analysis

    F.H.H. Linn;G.J.E. Rinkel;A. Algra;J. van Gijn

  • Risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage in the general population: a systematic review.

    M.J. Ariesen;S.P. Claus;G.J.E. Rinkel;A. Algra

  • The same sequence variant on 9p21 associates with myocardial infarction, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm

    Anna Helgadottir;Gudmar Thorleifsson;Kristinn P Magnusson;Solveig Grétarsdottir

  • Risk of Rupture of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in Relation to Patient and Aneurysm Characteristics An Updated Meta-Analysis

    Marieke J.H. Wermer;Irene C. van der Schaaf;Ale Algra;Gabriël J.E. Rinkel

  • Mortality and Morbidity of Surgery for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis

    Theodora W. M. Raaymakers;Gabriel J. E. Rinkel;Martien Limburg;Ale Algra

  • Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms by Embolization with Coils: A Systematic Review

    Eva H. Brilstra;Gabriel J. E. Rinkel;Yolanda van der Graaf;Willem Jan J. van Rooij

  • Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

    S M Dorhout Mees;G J E Rinkel;V L Feigin;Ale Algra

  • Calcium Antagonists for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

    Sanne M. Dorhout Mees;Gabriel J.E. Rinkel;Valery L. Feigin;Ale Algra

Frequent Co-Authors

Ale Algra
Ale Algra Leiden University
J. van Gijn
J. van Gijn Utrecht University
Erik Buskens
Erik Buskens University Medical Center Groningen
Cisca Wijmenga
Cisca Wijmenga University Medical Center Groningen
Charles B. L. M. Majoie
Charles B. L. M. Majoie University of Amsterdam
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman University of Edinburgh
Marinus Vermeulen
Marinus Vermeulen University of Amsterdam
Joseph P. Broderick
Joseph P. Broderick University of Cincinnati
Juha Hernesniemi
Juha Hernesniemi Zhengzhou University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible or alternative educational routes, several related online degrees offer strong career prospects. Advanced nursing practice is a popular option, and there are many cheap dnp online programs available for those wishing to pursue a Doctor of Nursing Practice at a lower cost.

The demand for pharmacists is also rising, and pharmacy school online programs allow students to earn their degrees with greater flexibility and convenience.

For those more interested in data, technology, or management roles in healthcare, consider exploring online schools for health information management. These programs prepare graduates for pivotal roles managing patients’ digital health records and compliance.

Entry-level opportunities also exist in medical administration through medical coding and billing. The medical billing and coding certification cost is often lower than more advanced degrees, making it a practical starting point for a healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Gabriel J.E. Rinkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles