World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles B. L. M. Majoie

Charles B. L. M. Majoie

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9091 8534 352 341 707 51946

Charles B. L. M. Majoie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles B. L. M. Majoie between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles B. L. M. Majoie published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 22.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 87 publications in 2021. 39 of the 802 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 87. Peak 87 publications in 2021. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 55 publications 2017: 43 publications 2018: 43 publications 2019: 55 publications 2020: 54 publications 2021: 87 publications 2022: 76 publications 2023: 55 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 38 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

802 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles B. L. M. Majoie: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 5
1998 2
1999 3
2000 3
2001 10
2002 5
2003 4
2004 10
2005 8
2006 15
2007 12
2008 15
2009 17
2010 16
2011 17
2012 15
2013 29
2014 30
2015 40
2016 55
2017 43
2018 43
2019 55
2020 54
2021 87
2022 76
2023 55
2024 34
2025 38
2026 1
Total 802
Download as CSV

Charles B. L. M. Majoie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles B. L. M. Majoie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 701–720 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 707 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307 707
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles B. L. M. Majoie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles B. L. M. Majoie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Charles B. L. M. Majoie is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their primary area of research lies within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several specialized subfields. These include Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Internal Medicine, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to acute ischemic stroke and related cerebrovascular diseases. Main topics of their work cover:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Frequent publication venues where Charles B. L. M. Majoie's work appears include:

  • Stroke
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Neurology

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate active involvement in clinical stroke research, particularly focused on endovascular treatments and acute stroke interventions. Notable publications include:

  • "Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke" (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion" (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Effect of Endovascular Treatment With Medical Management vs Standard Care on Severe Cerebral Venous Thrombosis" (2020, JAMA Neurology)
  • "Intensive blood pressure control after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED2/MT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial" (2022, The Lancet)
  • "Endovascular treatment versus no endovascular treatment after 6-24 h in patients with ischaemic stroke and collateral flow on CT angiography (MR CLEAN-LATE) in the Netherlands: a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial" (2023, The Lancet)

Collaborations are a significant part of Charles B. L. M. Majoie's research activities. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos
  • Diederik W.J. Dippel
  • Wim H. van Zwam
  • Aad van der Lugt
  • Bart J. Emmer

Best Publications

  • Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials

    Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon;Wim H. van Zwam;Diederik W. J. Dippel

  • A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

    D. Beumer;D. Beumer;J. Staals;J. Hofmeijer;J. Boiten

  • Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Aad van der Lugt;Bijoy K. Menon

  • The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: Classification of Bleeding Events After Ischemic Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy.

    Rüdiger Von Kummer;Joseph P. Broderick;Bruce C. V. Campbell;Andrew M Demchuk

  • Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (patch): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    M. Irem Baharoglu;Charlotte Cordonnier;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Koen De Gans

  • Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke

    Pengfei Yang;Yongwei Zhang;Lei Zhang;Yongxin Zhang

  • MR CLEAN, a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Puck S. S. Fransen;Debbie Beumer;Debbie Beumer;Olvert A. Berkhemer;Lucie A. van den Berg

  • Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms A Systematic Review on Initial Occlusion and Reopening and Retreatment Rates

    Sandra P. Ferns;Marieke E. S. Sprengers;Willem Jan van Rooij;Gabriel J. E. Rinkel

  • eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy

    David S. Liebeskind;Serge Bracard;Serge Bracard;Francis Guillemin;Francis Guillemin;Reza Jahan

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion

    Lucianne C.M. Langezaal;Erik J.R.J. van der Hoeven;Francisco J.A. Mont’Alverne;João J.F. de Carvalho

  • Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease

    Mark J.W. Koelemay;Paul J. Nederkoorn;Johannes B. Reitsma;Charles B. Majoie

  • Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V. Campbell;Wim H. Van Zwam;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon

  • Collateral Status on Baseline Computed Tomographic Angiography and Intra-Arterial Treatment Effect in Patients With Proximal Anterior Circulation Stroke.

    Olvert A. Berkhemer;Ivo G. H. Jansen;Debbie Beumer;Puck S. S. Fransen

  • Time to Reperfusion and Treatment Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Puck S. S. Fransen;Olvert A. Berkhemer;Hester F. Lingsma;Debbie Beumer

  • Correlation of imaging and histopathology of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke with etiology and outcome: a systematic review

    Waleed Brinjikji;Sharon Duffy;Anthony Burrows;Werner Hacke

  • Endovascular Thrombectomy and Thrombolysis for Severe Cerebral Sinus Thrombosis A Prospective Study

    Jan Stam;Charles B.L.M. Majoie;Otto M. van Delden;Krijn P. van Lienden

  • Posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of endovascular treatment

    J.P. Peluso;W.J. van Rooij;M. Sluzewski;G.N. Beute

  • Time to Reperfusion and Treatment Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial (vol 73, pg 190, 2016)

    Patrick A. Brouwer;Aad van der Lugt;Bart J. Emmer;Charles B. L. M. Majoie

Frequent Co-Authors

Diederik W.J. Dippel
Diederik W.J. Dippel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos
Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos University of Amsterdam
Aad van der Lugt
Aad van der Lugt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge Maastricht University
Hester F. Lingsma
Hester F. Lingsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but looking for more flexible or alternative pathways, a range of online degrees and related programs are available. For those drawn to administrative or technical roles, you can explore medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid. These courses can help you break into healthcare with a focus on documentation and insurance processes.

In nursing, requirements vary by school, and not all programs require standardized entrance exams. To learn more, review whether do I need to take the teas test for lpn programs that interest you. This can simplify the application process and fast-track your nursing education.

Those aiming for leadership roles can consider a health care administration degree, which prepares you for management positions in hospitals and clinics. For current nurses seeking to advance, explore asn to fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. These pathways can open up rewarding and high-demand healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Charles B. L. M. Majoie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles