World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles B. L. M. Majoie

Charles B. L. M. Majoie

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
51946
World Ranking
9092
National Ranking
352

Charles B. L. M. Majoie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles B. L. M. Majoie sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 707 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Charles B. L. M. Majoie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles B. L. M. Majoie sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles B. L. M. Majoie is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their primary area of research lies within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several specialized subfields. These include Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Internal Medicine, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to acute ischemic stroke and related cerebrovascular diseases. Main topics of their work cover:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Frequent publication venues where Charles B. L. M. Majoie's work appears include:

  • Stroke
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Neurology

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate active involvement in clinical stroke research, particularly focused on endovascular treatments and acute stroke interventions. Notable publications include:

  • "Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke" (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion" (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Effect of Endovascular Treatment With Medical Management vs Standard Care on Severe Cerebral Venous Thrombosis" (2020, JAMA Neurology)
  • "Intensive blood pressure control after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED2/MT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial" (2022, The Lancet)
  • "Endovascular treatment versus no endovascular treatment after 6-24 h in patients with ischaemic stroke and collateral flow on CT angiography (MR CLEAN-LATE) in the Netherlands: a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial" (2023, The Lancet)

Collaborations are a significant part of Charles B. L. M. Majoie's research activities. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos
  • Diederik W.J. Dippel
  • Wim H. van Zwam
  • Aad van der Lugt
  • Bart J. Emmer

Best Publications

  • Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials

    Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon;Wim H. van Zwam;Diederik W. J. Dippel

  • A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

    D. Beumer;D. Beumer;J. Staals;J. Hofmeijer;J. Boiten

  • Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Aad van der Lugt;Bijoy K. Menon

  • The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: Classification of Bleeding Events After Ischemic Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy.

    Rüdiger Von Kummer;Joseph P. Broderick;Bruce C. V. Campbell;Andrew M Demchuk

  • Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (patch): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    M. Irem Baharoglu;Charlotte Cordonnier;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Koen De Gans

  • Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke

    Pengfei Yang;Yongwei Zhang;Lei Zhang;Yongxin Zhang

  • MR CLEAN, a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Puck S. S. Fransen;Debbie Beumer;Debbie Beumer;Olvert A. Berkhemer;Lucie A. van den Berg

  • Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms A Systematic Review on Initial Occlusion and Reopening and Retreatment Rates

    Sandra P. Ferns;Marieke E. S. Sprengers;Willem Jan van Rooij;Gabriel J. E. Rinkel

  • eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy

    David S. Liebeskind;Serge Bracard;Serge Bracard;Francis Guillemin;Francis Guillemin;Reza Jahan

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion

    Lucianne C.M. Langezaal;Erik J.R.J. van der Hoeven;Francisco J.A. Mont’Alverne;João J.F. de Carvalho

  • Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease

    Mark J.W. Koelemay;Paul J. Nederkoorn;Johannes B. Reitsma;Charles B. Majoie

  • Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V. Campbell;Wim H. Van Zwam;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon

  • Collateral Status on Baseline Computed Tomographic Angiography and Intra-Arterial Treatment Effect in Patients With Proximal Anterior Circulation Stroke.

    Olvert A. Berkhemer;Ivo G. H. Jansen;Debbie Beumer;Puck S. S. Fransen

  • Time to Reperfusion and Treatment Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Puck S. S. Fransen;Olvert A. Berkhemer;Hester F. Lingsma;Debbie Beumer

  • Correlation of imaging and histopathology of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke with etiology and outcome: a systematic review

    Waleed Brinjikji;Sharon Duffy;Anthony Burrows;Werner Hacke

  • Endovascular Thrombectomy and Thrombolysis for Severe Cerebral Sinus Thrombosis A Prospective Study

    Jan Stam;Charles B.L.M. Majoie;Otto M. van Delden;Krijn P. van Lienden

  • Posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of endovascular treatment

    J.P. Peluso;W.J. van Rooij;M. Sluzewski;G.N. Beute

  • Time to Reperfusion and Treatment Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial (vol 73, pg 190, 2016)

    Patrick A. Brouwer;Aad van der Lugt;Bart J. Emmer;Charles B. L. M. Majoie

Frequent Co-Authors

Diederik W.J. Dippel
Diederik W.J. Dippel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos
Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos University of Amsterdam
Aad van der Lugt
Aad van der Lugt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge Maastricht University
Hester F. Lingsma
Hester F. Lingsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but looking for more flexible or alternative pathways, a range of online degrees and related programs are available. For those drawn to administrative or technical roles, you can explore medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid. These courses can help you break into healthcare with a focus on documentation and insurance processes.

In nursing, requirements vary by school, and not all programs require standardized entrance exams. To learn more, review whether do I need to take the teas test for lpn programs that interest you. This can simplify the application process and fast-track your nursing education.

Those aiming for leadership roles can consider a health care administration degree, which prepares you for management positions in hospitals and clinics. For current nurses seeking to advance, explore asn to fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. These pathways can open up rewarding and high-demand healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Charles B. L. M. Majoie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles