World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
45035
World Ranking
8182
National Ranking
318

Hester F. Lingsma publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hester F. Lingsma sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 622 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hester F. Lingsma D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hester F. Lingsma sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hester F. Lingsma is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medical sciences, with a substantial emphasis on neurology and related subfields.

Their work spans several specialized areas within medicine, particularly:

  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Internal Medicine

Lingsma's main topics of study reflect this focus, including:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

They have published extensively, with recent notable papers including:

  • "Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research" (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • "Endovascular treatment versus no endovascular treatment after 6-24 h in patients with ischaemic stroke and collateral flow on CT angiography (MR CLEAN-LATE) in the Netherlands: a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial" (2023, The Lancet)
  • "Comparison of eight prehospital stroke scales to detect intracranial large-vessel occlusion in suspected stroke (PRESTO): a prospective observational study" (2021, The Lancet Neurology)
  • "Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury" (2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  • "Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in China: a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, observational study" (2020, The Lancet Neurology)

Lingsma frequently collaborates with several researchers in their field, including:

  • Diederik W.J. Dippel
  • Aad van der Lugt
  • Charles B.L.M. Majoie
  • Bob Roozenbeek
  • Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos

Their work has been published in multiple prominent scientific journals, with a concentration of articles in:

  • Stroke
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • Neurology

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

    D. Beumer;D. Beumer;J. Staals;J. Hofmeijer;J. Boiten

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Aad van der Lugt;Bijoy K. Menon

  • Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe.

    Wouter Peeters;Ruben van den Brande;Suzanne Polinder;Alexandra Brazinova

  • Symptomatology and Functional Outcome in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from the Prospective TRACK-TBI Study

    Paul McMahon;Paul McMahon;Allison Hricik;John K. Yue;Ava M. Puccio

  • MR CLEAN, a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Puck S. S. Fransen;Debbie Beumer;Debbie Beumer;Olvert A. Berkhemer;Lucie A. van den Berg

  • Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions

    Hester F. Lingsma;Bob Roozenbeek;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Gordon D. Murray

  • Acute Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury: Relationship between Plasma Levels of Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

    Ramon Diaz-Arrastia;Kevin K.W. Wang;Linda Papa;Marco D. Sorani

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury

    Esther L. Yuh;Pratik Mukherjee;Hester F. Lingsma;John K. Yue

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Pilot: Multicenter Implementation of the Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury

    John K. Yue;Mary J. Vassar;Hester F. Lingsma;Shelly R. Cooper

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidence.

    Claudia Fischer;Hester F. Lingsma;Perla J. Marang-van de Mheen;Dionne S. Kringos

  • Early recognition of poor prognosis in Guillain-Barré syndrome

    C. Walgaard;H.F. Lingsma;L. Ruts;P.A. van Doorn

  • Spreading depolarisations and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study

    Jed A. Hartings;M. Ross Bullock;David O. Okonkwo;Lilian S. Murray

  • Prediction of respiratory insufficiency in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

    Christa Walgaard;Hester F Lingsma;Liselotte Ruts;Judith Drenthen

  • Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: External validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation after Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models

    Bob Roozenbeek;Hester F. Lingsma;Fiona E. Lecky;Juan Lu

  • Collateral Status on Baseline Computed Tomographic Angiography and Intra-Arterial Treatment Effect in Patients With Proximal Anterior Circulation Stroke.

    Olvert A. Berkhemer;Ivo G. H. Jansen;Debbie Beumer;Puck S. S. Fransen

  • Letter by Mulder et al Regarding Article, "2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association".

    Maxim J.H.L. Mulder;Hester F. Lingsma;Diederik W.J. Dippel

Frequent Co-Authors

Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Diederik W.J. Dippel
Diederik W.J. Dippel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
Charles B. L. M. Majoie
Charles B. L. M. Majoie University of Amsterdam
Aad van der Lugt
Aad van der Lugt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge Maastricht University
Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos
Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos University of Amsterdam
Geoffrey T. Manley
Geoffrey T. Manley University of California, San Francisco
David K. Menon
David K. Menon University of Cambridge
Pratik Mukherjee
Pratik Mukherjee University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking alternative educational pathways, a range of online healthcare degrees can open doors to rewarding careers. Many students pursue a Master of Health Administration to enter leadership roles—explore the best mha programs to find flexible, accredited options for advancing your expertise.

Registered Nurses looking to upskill can benefit from rn to bsn with no clinicals pathways, which allow nurses to complete their degree online without the need for additional in-person clinical hours. This is ideal for working professionals balancing career and education.

Aspiring nurse leaders can also consider doctoral options—look into the shortest dnp program online for accelerated learning, or review more affordable dnp programs to balance cost and convenience.

These online degrees can help lay the foundation for advanced practice, administration, and leadership opportunities throughout the healthcare system—all from the flexibility of home.

Best Scientists Citing Hester F. Lingsma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles