World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruce C.V. Campbell

Bruce C.V. Campbell

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
91
Citations
52626
World Ranking
1045
National Ranking
22

Bruce C.V. Campbell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce C.V. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 530 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bruce C.V. Campbell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce C.V. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Bruce C.V. Campbell is affiliated with the Royal Melbourne Hospital in Australia. Their research focuses predominantly on medicine, with significant contributions in epidemiology, neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, rehabilitation, and internal medicine. The primary topics of their work include acute ischemic stroke management, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, and peripheral artery disease management.

Campbell has published extensively in several prominent medical journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Stroke
  • Neurology
  • International Journal of Stroke
  • Annals of Neurology
  • JAMA Neurology

They have collaborated often with a number of researchers, including:

  • Peter Mitchell
  • Leonid Churilov
  • Mark Parsons
  • Michael D. Hill
  • Stephen M. Davis

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Campbell highlight their focus on stroke and thrombectomy treatment. Selected works include:

  • Stroke, 2020, published in The Lancet
  • Effect of Intravenous Tenecteplase Dose on Cerebral Reperfusion Before Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke, 2020, published in JAMA

Other notable papers from related collaborations include:

  • Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Efficacy and Safety of Nerinetide for the Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events (TRACE-2): A Phase 3, Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial, 2023, The Lancet

Bruce C.V. Campbell was recognized as a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials

    Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon;Wim H. van Zwam;Diederik W. J. Dippel

  • Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging Selection

    B. C. V. Campbell;L. Churilov;N. Yassi;B. Yan

  • Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Aad van der Lugt;Bijoy K. Menon

  • Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

    Unknown

  • The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: Classification of Bleeding Events After Ischemic Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy.

    Rüdiger Von Kummer;Joseph P. Broderick;Bruce C. V. Campbell;Andrew M Demchuk

  • A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.

    Mark Parsons;Neil Spratt;Andrew Bivard;Bruce Campbell

  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Michael D Hill;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K Menon;Raul G Nogueira

  • Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke

    David Sacks;Blaise Baxter;Bruce C.V. Campbell;Jeffrey S. Carpenter

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Cerebral Blood Flow Is the Optimal CT Perfusion Parameter for Assessing Infarct Core

    Bruce C.V. Campbell;Søren Christensen;Christopher R. Levi;Patricia M. Desmond

  • eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy

    David S. Liebeskind;Serge Bracard;Serge Bracard;Francis Guillemin;Francis Guillemin;Reza Jahan

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II

    Max Wintermark;Gregory W. Albers;Andrei V. Alexandrov;Jeffry R. Alger

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Endovascular stent thrombectomy: the new standard of care for large vessel ischaemic stroke

    Bruce C V Campbell;Geoffrey A Donnan;Kennedy R Lees;Werner Hacke

  • Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V. Campbell;Wim H. Van Zwam;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon

  • RAPID Automated Patient Selection for Reperfusion Therapy A Pooled Analysis of the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET) and the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) Study

    Maarten G. Lansberg;Jun Lee;Soren Christensen;Matus Straka

  • Helsinki model cut stroke thrombolysis delays to 25 minutes in Melbourne in only 4 months

    Atte Meretoja;Louise Weir;Melissa Ugalde;Nawaf Yassi

  • Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity

    Thomas J Oxley;Nicholas L Opie;Sam E John;Gil S Rind;Gil S Rind

  • Failure of Collateral Blood Flow is Associated with Infarct Growth in Ischemic Stroke

    Bruce Cv Campbell;Søren Christensen;Brian M Tress;Leonid Churilov

  • Efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions: meta-analysis of data from the HERMES Collaboration.

    Bijoy K Menon;Michael D Hill;Antoni Davalos;Yvo B W E M Roos

  • Safety and Efficacy of Solitaire Stent Thrombectomy: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

    Bruce C.V. Campbell;Michael D. Hill;Marta Rubiera;Bijoy K. Menon

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Davis
Stephen M. Davis University of Melbourne
Geoffrey A. Donnan
Geoffrey A. Donnan University of Melbourne
Mark W. Parsons
Mark W. Parsons University of New South Wales
Patricia Desmond
Patricia Desmond University of Melbourne
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Christopher R. Levi
Christopher R. Levi John Hunter Hospital
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to various educational and career options. Many students are interested in combining neuroscience with one of the most lucrative college majors to maximize future earnings potential. Fields such as biomedical engineering or data science can complement neuroscience knowledge and lead to high-paying roles in research, healthcare, or technology.

Flexible study options are also available through online colleges that accept financial aid, making education more accessible and affordable. For those seeking quicker entry into the workforce, practical skills can be gained through certificate programs online in areas like bioinformatics, healthcare technology, or data analytics.

Students who prefer a streamlined path may explore the easiest online degrees and majors that offer foundational insights into neuroscience-related fields. Whether you aim for a traditional degree or a flexible online pathway, these options help you tailor your academic journey towards a rewarding neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce C.V. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles