World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
51978
World Ranking
9091
National Ranking
274

Mark W. Parsons publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Parsons sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark W. Parsons D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Parsons sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Parsons is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their primary research contributions are rooted in the field of Medicine, with 660 publications, and focus significantly on subfields such as Epidemiology, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Rehabilitation.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Effect of Intravenous Tenecteplase Dose on Cerebral Reperfusion Before Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke, 2020, JAMA
  • Colchicine in Cardiovascular Disease: In-Depth Review, 2022, Circulation
  • Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard bridging thrombolytic with endovascular thrombectomy within 4·5 h of stroke onset: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised non-inferiority trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • Intensive blood pressure control after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED2/MT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial, 2022, The Lancet

Their work extensively covers topics related to:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management

Mark W. Parsons frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors including Bruce Campbell, Andrew Bivard, Leonid Churilov, Timothy Kleinig, and Christopher Levi.

Their research has been published often in several prominent venues, which include:

  • Stroke
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Neurology
  • International Journal of Stroke
  • Stroke and Vascular Neurology

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to book publications, including a title scheduled for 2025 called "Proposals for a Caring Economy," published by the University of Minnesota Press.

Best Publications

  • Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging Selection

    B. C. V. Campbell;L. Churilov;N. Yassi;B. Yan

  • Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials

    Jonathan Emberson;Kennedy R Lees;Patrick Lyden;Lisa Blackwell

  • Rapid Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Craig S. Anderson;Emma Heeley;Yining Huang;Jiguang Wang

  • Pioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

    W. N. Kernan;C. M. Viscoli;K. L. Furie;L. H. Young

  • Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial.

    Stephen M Davis;Geoffrey A Donnan;Mark W Parsons;Christopher Levi

  • Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial.

    Craig S Anderson;Yining Huang;Ji Guang Wang;Hisatomi Arima;Hisatomi Arima

  • Persistent Poststroke Hyperglycemia Is Independently Associated With Infarct Expansion and Worse Clinical Outcome

    Tracey A. Baird;Mark W. Parsons;Thanh Phan;Ken S. Butcher

  • Acute hyperglycemia adversely affects stroke outcome: a magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy study

    Mark W. Parsons;P. Alan Barber;Patricia M. Desmond;Tracey A. Baird;Tracey A. Baird

  • A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.

    Mark Parsons;Neil Spratt;Andrew Bivard;Bruce Campbell

  • Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

    Bruce C.V. Campbell;Peter J. Mitchell;Leonid Churilov;Nawaf Yassi

  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Michael D Hill;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K Menon;Raul G Nogueira

  • The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke

    Ferdinand Miteff;Christopher R. Levi;Christopher R. Levi;Grant A. Bateman;Neil Spratt;Neil Spratt

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Task‐specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice

    Isobelle J. Hubbard;Mark W. Parsons;Cheryl. Neilson;Leeanne M. Carey

  • Cerebral Blood Flow Is the Optimal CT Perfusion Parameter for Assessing Infarct Core

    Bruce C.V. Campbell;Søren Christensen;Christopher R. Levi;Patricia M. Desmond

  • Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Craig S. Anderson;Thompson Robinson;Richard I. Lindley;Hisatomi Arima

  • Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI response to thrombolysis in stroke.

    Mark W. Parsons;P. Alan Barber;Jonathon Chalk;David G. Darby

  • Implementation and outcome of thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4·5 h after an acute stroke: an updated analysis from SITS-ISTR

    Niaz Ahmed;Nils Wahlgren;Martin Grond;Michael Hennerici

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebralhaemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial

    Craig Anderson;Hisatomi Arima;John Chalmers;Emma Heeley

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher R. Levi
Christopher R. Levi John Hunter Hospital
Stephen M. Davis
Stephen M. Davis University of Melbourne
Geoffrey A. Donnan
Geoffrey A. Donnan University of Melbourne
Bruce C.V. Campbell
Bruce C.V. Campbell Royal Melbourne Hospital
Patricia Desmond
Patricia Desmond University of Melbourne
Craig S. Anderson
Craig S. Anderson George Institute for Global Health
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Tissa Wijeratne
Tissa Wijeratne La Trobe University
John Attia
John Attia University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding healthcare careers. In addition to the traditional MD pathway, many students consider alternative routes in related health fields. Pursuing a cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration can lead to leadership roles in hospitals and health systems, often with flexible learning options and affordable tuition.

For nursing professionals, advancing your clinical expertise is possible through the cheapest dnp program. Doctor of Nursing Practice degrees are increasingly in demand and are now widely available online, making them accessible while you continue working.

Pharmacy is another growing field, and those looking for flexibility might explore online pharmacy programs. These offerings can help you earn credentials while balancing other commitments.

Additionally, the intersection of technology and health is expanding rapidly. Earning an online degree through a health informatics program allows graduates to manage medical data and optimize patient care with advanced digital tools.

These alternative degrees can lead to fulfilling careers in healthcare, with many affordable online options to fit different goals and lifestyles.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Parsons

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles