World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 6948 6536 3658 3393 732 50078

Max Wintermark publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Max Wintermark between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Max Wintermark published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 37 papers a year. Output peaked at 106 publications in 2025. 180 of the 999 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 106. Peak 106 publications in 2025. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 40 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 51 publications 2015: 72 publications 2016: 46 publications 2017: 60 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 48 publications 2020: 57 publications 2021: 60 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 73 publications 2024: 74 publications 2025: 106 publications
1999 2025

999 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Max Wintermark: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 10
2001 7
2002 11
2003 10
2004 8
2005 8
2006 15
2007 13
2008 40
2009 14
2010 32
2011 21
2012 26
2013 43
2014 51
2015 72
2016 46
2017 60
2018 48
2019 48
2020 57
2021 60
2022 45
2023 73
2024 74
2025 106
Total 999
Download as CSV

Max Wintermark publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Wintermark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 732 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 732
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Max Wintermark D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Wintermark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Max Wintermark is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on acute ischemic stroke management and cerebrovascular diseases. Their work spans multiple subfields including epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, neurology, and internal medicine.

The research topics covered by Wintermark include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Wintermark has published numerous papers in a variety of academic journals. Some of their recent publications include:

  • The Advent of Generative Language Models in Medical Education, 2023, JMIR Medical Education
  • Personalized brain circuit scores identify clinically distinct biotypes in depression and anxiety, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Carotid Plaque-RADS, 2023, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Hypoperfusion intensity ratio correlates with angiographic collaterals in acute ischaemic stroke with M1 occlusion, 2020, European Journal of Neurology
  • From "Time is Brain" to "Imaging is Brain": A Paradigm Shift in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2020, Journal of Neuroimaging

Their work has been published frequently in key venues related to neuroradiology and stroke, including:

  • American Journal of Neuroradiology
  • Stroke
  • Journal of Neuroimaging
  • Neuroradiology
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Wintermark collaborates with several frequent co-authors, notably:

  • Jeremy J. Heit
  • Gregory W. Albers
  • Vivek Yedavalli
  • Tobias D. Faizy
  • Adam A. Dmytriw

Best Publications

  • The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)

    Bjoern H. Menze;Andras Jakab;Stefan Bauer;Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer

  • A Trial of Imaging Selection and Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Reza Jahan;Jeffrey Gornbein;Jeffry R. Alger

  • Recommendations on Angiographic Revascularization Grading Standards for Acute Ischemic Stroke A Consensus Statement

    Osama O. Zaidat;Albert J. Yoo;Pooja Khatri;Thomas A. Tomsick

  • Perfusion-CT Assessment of Infarct Core and Penumbra Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis in 130 Patients Suspected of Acute Hemispheric Stroke

    Max Wintermark;Adam E. Flanders;Birgitta Velthuis;Reto Meuli

  • Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques

    Max Wintermark;Musa Sesay;Emmanuel Barbier;Katalin Borbély

  • A Pilot Study of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor

    W Jeffrey Elias;Diane Huss;Tiffini Voss;Johanna Loomba

  • Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

    Werner Hacke;Anthony J Furlan;Yasir Al-Rawi;Antoni Davalos

  • Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients.

    Max Wintermark;Marc Reichhart;Jean-Philippe Thiran;Philippe Maeder

  • Resting-State Functional MRI: Everything That Nonexperts Have Always Wanted to Know.

    H. Lv;Z. Wang;E. Tong;L.M. Williams

  • Recommendations for the Management of Cerebral and Cerebellar Infarction With Swelling A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Eelco F. M. Wijdicks;Kevin N. Sheth;Bob S. Carter;David M. Greer

  • Simultaneous measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by perfusion CT and stable xenon CT: a validation study.

    Max Wintermark;Jean-Philippe Thiran;Philippe Maeder;Pierre Schnyder

  • MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: Multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set

    David A. Gutman;Lee A.D. Cooper;Scott N. Hwang;Chad A. Holder

  • Comparison of Admission Perfusion Computed Tomography and Qualitative Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke Patients

    M. Wintermark;M. Reichhart;O. Cuisenaire;P. Maeder

  • Systematic comparison of perfusion-CT and CT-angiography in acute stroke patients

    Jessica C. Tan;William P. Dillon;Songling Liu;Felix Adler

  • CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis: pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke.

    James D. Eastwood;Michael H. Lev;Tarek Azhari;Ting-Yim Lee

  • High-resolution CT imaging of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques.

    Max Wintermark;Sumayya Jawadi;J. H. Rapp;T. Tihan

  • Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II

    Max Wintermark;Gregory W. Albers;Andrei V. Alexandrov;Jeffry R. Alger

  • Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions.

    Marco Essig;Thanh Binh Nguyen;Mark S. Shiroishi;Marc Saake

  • Quantitative Assessment of Regional Cerebral Blood Flows by Perfusion CT Studies at Low Injection Rates: A Critical Review of the Underlying Theoretical Models

    M. Wintermark;P. Maeder;J.-P. Thiran;P. Schnyder

  • Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications.

    Luca Saba;Tobias Saam;H Rolf Jäger;Chun Yuan

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrik Michel
Patrik Michel University of Lausanne
William P. Dillon
William P. Dillon University of California, San Francisco
Gregory W. Albers
Gregory W. Albers Stanford University
Reto Meuli
Reto Meuli University of Lausanne
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Wade S. Smith
Wade S. Smith University of California, San Francisco
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Steven Warach
Steven Warach The University of Texas at Austin
Michael P. Marks
Michael P. Marks Stanford University
James M. Provenzale
James M. Provenzale Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to many rewarding healthcare careers. Online degrees can provide faster, more flexible pathways to advancing your career in the field. If you’re considering advanced practice, check out the cheapest online dnp programs to earn a top-level nursing credential at a lower price.

For those just starting out, accredited lpn programs online let you enter the healthcare workforce quickly as a Licensed Practical Nurse. If mental health is your passion, you can accelerate your journey with the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program and specialize as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

Not everyone needs to be on the clinical side. Those interested in leadership or management roles can save money and gain essential knowledge through the cheapest online healthcare administration degree programs. No matter your chosen path, these flexible online degree options can help you achieve your goals in the evolving world of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Max Wintermark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles