World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17458 16404 8741 8075 1030 25907

Han Jo Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Han Jo Kim between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Han Jo Kim published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 35.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 102 publications in 2016. 161 of the 1,619 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 102. Peak 102 publications in 2016. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 30 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 49 publications 2010: 58 publications 2011: 53 publications 2012: 62 publications 2013: 90 publications 2014: 82 publications 2015: 96 publications 2016: 102 publications 2017: 81 publications 2018: 83 publications 2019: 90 publications 2020: 86 publications 2021: 93 publications 2022: 76 publications 2023: 93 publications 2024: 85 publications 2025: 76 publications
1980 2025

1,619 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Han Jo Kim: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 5
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 5
1993 13
1994 6
1995 5
1996 7
1997 11
1998 10
1999 8
2000 17
2001 12
2002 18
2003 14
2004 21
2005 22
2006 24
2007 30
2008 26
2009 49
2010 58
2011 53
2012 62
2013 90
2014 82
2015 96
2016 102
2017 81
2018 83
2019 90
2020 86
2021 93
2022 76
2023 93
2024 85
2025 76
Total 1,619
Download as CSV

Han Jo Kim publications per year - data summary

  • Han Jo Kim, a Medicine scholar from Hospital for Special Surgery, has 1,619 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 102 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1980, 1987 and 1989, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 46 years in the span carry no publications at all (1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 35.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 39.5 per year counting only the 41 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 423 publications, 26% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1995: 44 publications (2.8 per year); 1996-2011: 380 publications (23.8 per year); 2012-2025: 1,195 publications (85.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Han Jo Kim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Han Jo Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,021–1,040 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,030 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70 1,030
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Han Jo Kim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Han Jo Kim, a Medicine scholar from Hospital for Special Surgery, records 1,030 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Han Jo Kim, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Han Jo Kim ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Han Jo Kim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Han Jo Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Han Jo Kim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Han Jo Kim, a Medicine scholar from Hospital for Special Surgery, records 79 D-Index - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Han Jo Kim, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Han Jo Kim ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Han Jo Kim is affiliated with the Hospital for Special Surgery in the United States. Their primary field of research is Medicine, with a specific focus on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics related to spinal health and neurological conditions, including:

  • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries

In terms of publication venues, Han Jo Kim has contributed extensively to journals such as:

  • The Spine Journal
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
  • Spine
  • UNC Libraries
  • Brain and Spine

Their recent scientific papers include:

  • "Choroid Plexus Volume and Permeability at Brain MRI within the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum," 2022, Radiology
  • "Treatment of MOG antibody associated disorders: results of an international survey," 2020, Padua Research Archive (University of Padua)
  • "Alternative Splicing in Hepatocellular Carcinoma," 2020, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • "Secukinumab responses vary across the spectrum of congenital ichthyosis in adults," 2022, Archives of Dermatological Research
  • "Neuroanesthesia Guidelines for Optimizing Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Neuromonitoring During Deformity and Complex Spinal Surgery," 2020, Spine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Han Jo Kim include:

  • Virginie Lafage
  • Shay Bess
  • Christopher I. Shaffrey
  • Eric O. Klineberg
  • Christopher P. Ames

Best Publications

  • Virtual microdissection identifies distinct tumor- and stroma-specific subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

    Richard A. Moffitt;Raoud Marayati;Elizabeth L. Flate;Keith E. Volmar

  • Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.

    Christopher P. Ames;Benjamin Blondel;Justin K. Scheer;Frank J. Schwab

  • Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.

    David A. Kooby;David A. Kooby;Theresa Gillespie;Theresa Gillespie;David Jason Bentrem;Attila Nakeeb

  • Defining Spino-Pelvic Alignment Thresholds: Should Operative Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Account for Age?

    Renaud Lafage;Frank Schwab;Vincent Challier;Jensen K. Henry

  • A Multicenter Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: Is Laparoscopic Resection Appropriate?

    David A. Kooby;David A. Kooby;William G. Hawkins;C. Max Schmidt;Sharon M. Weber

  • Prospective multicenter assessment of perioperative and minimum 2-year postoperative complication rates associated with adult spinal deformity surgery

    Justin S. Smith;Eric Otto Klineberg;Virginie Lafage;Christopher I. Shaffrey

  • A computed tomography radiogenomic biomarker predicts microvascular invasion and clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma

    Sudeep Banerjee;David S. Wang;Hyun J. Kim;Claude B. Sirlin

  • Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections.

    Han Jo Kim;Keith H. Bridwell;Lawrence G. Lenke;Moon Soo Park

  • Factors Influencing Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study of 1302 Patients.

    Syed A. Ahmad;Michael J. Edwards;Jeffrey M. Sutton;Sanjeet S. Grewal

  • Neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis: Seeing differences through optical coherence tomography

    J. L. Bennett;J. De Seze;M. Lana-Peixoto;J. Palace

  • Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessment With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

    Justin S. Smith;Virginie Lafage;Christopher I. Shaffrey;Frank Schwab

  • Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system

    Christopher P. Ames;Justin S. Smith;Robert Eastlack;Donald J. Blaskiewicz

  • Cervical radiculopathy

    Sravisht Iyer;Han Jo Kim

  • A six-gene signature predicts survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

    Jeran K. Stratford;David J. Bentrem;Judy M. Anderson;Cheng Fan

  • Does Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Influence Femoroacetabular Flexion in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

    Christina I Esposito;Theodore T Miller;Han Jo Kim;Brian T Barlow

  • MRI-visible perivascular space location is associated with Alzheimer's disease independently of amyloid burden.

    Gargi Banerjee;Hee Jin Kim;Zoe Fox;H Rolf Jäger

  • Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review.

    Han Jo Kim;Lawrence G. Lenke;Christopher I. Shaffrey;Ellen M. Van Alstyne

  • Characterization and surgical outcomes of proximal junctional failure in surgically treated patients with adult spinal deformity.

    Mitsuru Yagi;Mark Rahm;Robert Gaines;Ali Maziad

  • Anatomical heterogeneity of Alzheimer disease Based on cortical thickness on MRIs

    Young Noh;Seun Jeon;Jong Min Lee;Sang Won Seo

  • Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Bevacizumab: Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Subtraction Maps Improve Tumor Delineation and Aid Prediction of Survival in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

    Benjamin M. Ellingson;Hyun J. Kim;Davis C. Woodworth;Whitney B. Pope

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank J. Schwab
Frank J. Schwab Hospital for Special Surgery
Virginie Lafage
Virginie Lafage Lenox Hill Hospital
Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames University of California, San Francisco
Justin S. Smith
Justin S. Smith University of Virginia
Todd J. Albert
Todd J. Albert Hospital for Special Surgery
Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Weill Cornell Medicine
Daniel M. Sciubba
Daniel M. Sciubba Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lawrence G. Lenke
Lawrence G. Lenke Columbia University
Keith H. Bridwell
Keith H. Bridwell Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes in healthcare is becoming increasingly popular for students interested in medicine. Many are choosing direct admit nursing programs that allow for immediate entry into nursing school after high school, streamlining the path to becoming a registered nurse.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are medical billing and coding schools with financial aid, making these programs financially accessible while leading to in-demand careers. Similarly, students can opt for an accelerated healthcare administration degree to fast-track their journey into leadership roles within health organizations.

Flexibility is also key, with options like nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi, easing the admissions process for prospective nurses. These diverse pathways offer multiple entry points into healthcare, catering to various academic backgrounds and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Han Jo Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles