World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
25907
World Ranking
17458
National Ranking
8741

Han Jo Kim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Han Jo Kim sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,030 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Han Jo Kim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Han Jo Kim sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Han Jo Kim is affiliated with the Hospital for Special Surgery in the United States. Their primary field of research is Medicine, with a specific focus on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics related to spinal health and neurological conditions, including:

  • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries

In terms of publication venues, Han Jo Kim has contributed extensively to journals such as:

  • The Spine Journal
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
  • Spine
  • UNC Libraries
  • Brain and Spine

Their recent scientific papers include:

  • "Choroid Plexus Volume and Permeability at Brain MRI within the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum," 2022, Radiology
  • "Treatment of MOG antibody associated disorders: results of an international survey," 2020, Padua Research Archive (University of Padua)
  • "Alternative Splicing in Hepatocellular Carcinoma," 2020, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • "Secukinumab responses vary across the spectrum of congenital ichthyosis in adults," 2022, Archives of Dermatological Research
  • "Neuroanesthesia Guidelines for Optimizing Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Neuromonitoring During Deformity and Complex Spinal Surgery," 2020, Spine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Han Jo Kim include:

  • Virginie Lafage
  • Shay Bess
  • Christopher I. Shaffrey
  • Eric O. Klineberg
  • Christopher P. Ames

Best Publications

  • Virtual microdissection identifies distinct tumor- and stroma-specific subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

    Richard A. Moffitt;Raoud Marayati;Elizabeth L. Flate;Keith E. Volmar

  • Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.

    Christopher P. Ames;Benjamin Blondel;Justin K. Scheer;Frank J. Schwab

  • Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.

    David A. Kooby;David A. Kooby;Theresa Gillespie;Theresa Gillespie;David Jason Bentrem;Attila Nakeeb

  • Defining Spino-Pelvic Alignment Thresholds: Should Operative Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Account for Age?

    Renaud Lafage;Frank Schwab;Vincent Challier;Jensen K. Henry

  • A Multicenter Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: Is Laparoscopic Resection Appropriate?

    David A. Kooby;David A. Kooby;William G. Hawkins;C. Max Schmidt;Sharon M. Weber

  • Prospective multicenter assessment of perioperative and minimum 2-year postoperative complication rates associated with adult spinal deformity surgery

    Justin S. Smith;Eric Otto Klineberg;Virginie Lafage;Christopher I. Shaffrey

  • A computed tomography radiogenomic biomarker predicts microvascular invasion and clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma

    Sudeep Banerjee;David S. Wang;Hyun J. Kim;Claude B. Sirlin

  • Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections.

    Han Jo Kim;Keith H. Bridwell;Lawrence G. Lenke;Moon Soo Park

  • Factors Influencing Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study of 1302 Patients.

    Syed A. Ahmad;Michael J. Edwards;Jeffrey M. Sutton;Sanjeet S. Grewal

  • Neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis: Seeing differences through optical coherence tomography

    J. L. Bennett;J. De Seze;M. Lana-Peixoto;J. Palace

  • Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessment With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

    Justin S. Smith;Virginie Lafage;Christopher I. Shaffrey;Frank Schwab

  • Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system

    Christopher P. Ames;Justin S. Smith;Robert Eastlack;Donald J. Blaskiewicz

  • Cervical radiculopathy

    Sravisht Iyer;Han Jo Kim

  • A six-gene signature predicts survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

    Jeran K. Stratford;David J. Bentrem;Judy M. Anderson;Cheng Fan

  • Does Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Influence Femoroacetabular Flexion in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

    Christina I Esposito;Theodore T Miller;Han Jo Kim;Brian T Barlow

  • MRI-visible perivascular space location is associated with Alzheimer's disease independently of amyloid burden.

    Gargi Banerjee;Hee Jin Kim;Zoe Fox;H Rolf Jäger

  • Proximal junctional kyphosis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review.

    Han Jo Kim;Lawrence G. Lenke;Christopher I. Shaffrey;Ellen M. Van Alstyne

  • Characterization and surgical outcomes of proximal junctional failure in surgically treated patients with adult spinal deformity.

    Mitsuru Yagi;Mark Rahm;Robert Gaines;Ali Maziad

  • Anatomical heterogeneity of Alzheimer disease Based on cortical thickness on MRIs

    Young Noh;Seun Jeon;Jong Min Lee;Sang Won Seo

  • Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Bevacizumab: Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Subtraction Maps Improve Tumor Delineation and Aid Prediction of Survival in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

    Benjamin M. Ellingson;Hyun J. Kim;Davis C. Woodworth;Whitney B. Pope

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank J. Schwab
Frank J. Schwab Hospital for Special Surgery
Virginie Lafage
Virginie Lafage Lenox Hill Hospital
Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames University of California, San Francisco
Justin S. Smith
Justin S. Smith University of Virginia
Todd J. Albert
Todd J. Albert Hospital for Special Surgery
Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Weill Cornell Medicine
Daniel M. Sciubba
Daniel M. Sciubba Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lawrence G. Lenke
Lawrence G. Lenke Columbia University
Keith H. Bridwell
Keith H. Bridwell Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes in healthcare is becoming increasingly popular for students interested in medicine. Many are choosing direct admit nursing programs that allow for immediate entry into nursing school after high school, streamlining the path to becoming a registered nurse.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are medical billing and coding schools with financial aid, making these programs financially accessible while leading to in-demand careers. Similarly, students can opt for an accelerated healthcare administration degree to fast-track their journey into leadership roles within health organizations.

Flexibility is also key, with options like nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi, easing the admissions process for prospective nurses. These diverse pathways offer multiple entry points into healthcare, catering to various academic backgrounds and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Han Jo Kim

Trending Scientists