World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
38769
World Ranking
5391
National Ranking
2909

Todd J. Albert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd J. Albert sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 890 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Todd J. Albert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd J. Albert sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd J. Albert is affiliated with the Hospital for Special Surgery in the United States. Their primary field of research is Medicine, with significant focus on Surgery and related subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Biomedical Engineering.

The research topics covered by Todd J. Albert include:

  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Scoliosis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management

Todd J. Albert has contributed to numerous publications across a variety of respected spinal and orthopedic journals. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • The Spine Journal
  • Spine
  • Global Spine Journal
  • Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Spine

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Todd J. Albert include:

  • Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (2021, JAMA)
  • Fusion Rate for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review (2020, The Spine Journal)
  • The Spine Physical Examination Using Telemedicine: Strategies and Best Practices (2020, Global Spine Journal)
  • Does Interbody Cage Lordosis Impact Actual Segmental Lordosis Achieved in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Fusion? (2020, Neurosurgical FOCUS)
  • How Do Areas of Work Life Drive Burnout in Orthopaedic Attending Surgeons, Fellows, and Residents? (2020, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research)

Collaborations have played a significant role in Todd J. Albert's research contributions. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Sheeraz A. Qureshi
  • Sravisht Iyer
  • Avani S. Vaishnav
  • Catherine Himo Gang
  • Francis Lovecchio

Best Publications

  • Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

    James N Weinstein;Tor D Tosteson;Jon D Lurie;Anna N A Tosteson

  • Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

    Jeff S. Silber;D. Greg Anderson;Scott D. Daffner;Brian T. Brislin

  • Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

    James Neil Weinstein;Jon D. Lurie;Tor D. Tosteson;Brett Hanscom

  • Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort

    James Neil Weinstein;Jon D. Lurie;Tor D. Tosteson;Jonathan S. Skinner

  • Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

    James Neil Weinstein;Jon D. Lurie;Tor D. Tosteson;Anna N.A. Tosteson

  • Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

    James Neil Weinstein;Tor D. Tosteson;Jon D. Lurie;Anna Tosteson

  • Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation

    James Weinstein;Jon Lurie;Tor Tosteson;Anna Tosteson

  • Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards a nucleus pulposus-like phenotype in vitro: implications for cell-based transplantation therapy.

    Makarand V Risbud;Todd J Albert;Asha Guttapalli;Edward J Vresilovic

  • Comparison of Transcranial Electric Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring During Cervical Spine Surgery

    Alan S. Hilibrand;Daniel M. Schwartz;Venkat Sethuraman;Alexander R. Vaccaro

  • Evidence for skeletal progenitor cells in the degenerate human intervertebral disc.

    Makarand V. Risbud;Asha Guttapalli;Tsung-Ting Tsai;Joon Y. Lee

  • Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures.

    Jonathan N. Grauer;Bilal Shafi;Alan S. Hilibrand;James S. Harrop

  • Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques.

    Steven C. Ludwig;David L. Kramer;Richard A. Balderston;Alexander R. Vaccaro

  • The influence of obesity on the outcome of treatment of lumbar disc herniation: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

    Jeffrey A. Rihn;Mark Kurd;Alan S. Hilibrand;Jon Lurie

  • Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study.

    Lee H. Riley;Richard L. Skolasky;Todd J. Albert;Alexander R. Vaccaro

  • Nucleus pulposus cells express HIF-1α under normoxic culture conditions: A metabolic adaptation to the intervertebral disc microenvironment

    Makarand V. Risbud;Asha Guttapalli;David G. Stokes;David Hawkins

  • Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years.

    Anna N.A. Tosteson;Jon D. Lurie;Tor D. Tosteson;Jonathan S. Skinner

  • Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation.

    Anna N.A. Tosteson;Tor D. Tosteson;Jon D. Lurie;William Abdu

  • Psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain.

    Ana Maria Vranceanu;Arthur Barsky;David Ring

  • Three-dimensional cartilage formation by bone marrow-derived cells seeded in polylactide/alginate amalgam.

    Edward J. Caterson;Leon J. Nesti;Wan-Ju Li;Keith G. Danielson

  • Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004

    Todd J. Albert;David H. Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander R. Vaccaro
Alexander R. Vaccaro Thomas Jefferson University
Alan S. Hilibrand
Alan S. Hilibrand Thomas Jefferson University
Richard H. Rothman
Richard H. Rothman Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Han Jo Kim
Han Jo Kim Hospital for Special Surgery
James S. Harrop
James S. Harrop Thomas Jefferson University
Virginie Lafage
Virginie Lafage Lenox Hill Hospital
Makarand V. Risbud
Makarand V. Risbud Thomas Jefferson University
James Neil Weinstein
James Neil Weinstein Microsoft (United States)
Irving M. Shapiro
Irving M. Shapiro Thomas Jefferson University
Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA is just one route to a rewarding healthcare career. If you’re seeking flexibility or exploring alternative pathways, online degrees offer a broad range of opportunities. For example, online schools for health information management provide training in managing patient records and healthcare data—skills in high demand as the industry digitizes.

Those interested in the business and administrative side of healthcare can explore medical billing and coding classes online. These programs are ideal for quick entry into growing support roles, often with the option to study at your own pace.

Looking for advanced clinical roles? The most affordable online nurse practitioner programs let registered nurses expand their skills without putting their careers on hold. Meanwhile, those new to nursing can fast-track their entry into the field through cheapest online accelerated bsn programs.

Each of these online options provides accessible, flexible pathways to launch or grow your healthcare career—no matter your starting point.

Best Scientists Citing Todd J. Albert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles