World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
30361
World Ranking
12188
National Ranking
6250

James S. Harrop publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Harrop sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 570 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James S. Harrop D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Harrop sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James S. Harrop is affiliated with Thomas Jefferson University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a significant emphasis on surgical disciplines. They have contributed extensively to the subfields of surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, public health, environmental and occupational health, neurology, and emergency medicine.

The scientist's work encompasses a variety of topics related to spinal health and trauma. Major research interests include spine and intervertebral disc pathology, spinal fractures and fixation techniques, spinal cord injury research, cervical and thoracic myelopathy, spinal dysraphism and malformations, spinal hematomas and complications, and trauma and emergency care studies.

James S. Harrop has a noteworthy publication record with frequent contributions to several high-impact journals. Key publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Global Spine Journal
  • World Neurosurgery
  • The Spine Journal
  • Journal of Neurotrauma

Among their recent publications are:

  • The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data, 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, 2021, JAMA
  • The role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury, 2022, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
  • Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery, 2020, Global Spine Journal
  • Early Surgery for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Where Are We Now?, 2020, Global Spine Journal

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Their notable coauthors include:

  • Michael G. Fehlings
  • Alexander R. Vaccaro
  • Ashwini Sharan
  • Joshua Heller
  • Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar

Best Publications

  • A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group.

    Charles G. Fisher;Christian P. Dipaola;Timothy C. Ryken;Mark H. Bilsky

  • A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries : The importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status

    Alexander R. Vaccaro;Ronald A. Lehman;R. John Hurlbert;Paul A. Anderson

  • Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS).

    Michael G. Fehlings;Alexander Vaccaro;Jefferson R. Wilson;Anoushka Singh

  • Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury-Repair and Regeneration.

    Christopher S. Ahuja;Satoshi Nori;Lindsay Tetreault;Jefferson Wilson

  • Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score: An Analysis of Reliability and Validity From the Spine Oncology Study Group

    Daryl R. Fourney;Evan M. Frangou;Timothy C. Ryken;Christian P. DiPaola

  • The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex.

    Alexander R. Vaccaro;R. John Hulbert;Alpesh A. Patel;Charles Fisher

  • Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications

    Nimesh Patel;Bradley Bagan;Sumeet Vadera;Mitchell Gil Maltenfort

  • A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression

    Michael G. Fehlings;Michael G. Fehlings;Lindsay A. Tetreault;Lindsay A. Tetreault;K. Daniel Riew;James W. Middleton

  • Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty.

    James S. Harrop;Jim A. Youssef;Mitch Maltenfort;Peggy Vorwald

  • Complications in spine surgery

    Rani Nasser;Sanjay Yadla;Mitchell G Maltenfort;James S Harrop

  • The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm.

    Alexander R. Vaccaro;Steven C. Zeiller;R. John Hulbert;Paul A. Anderson

  • Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures.

    Jonathan N. Grauer;Bilal Shafi;Alan S. Hilibrand;James S. Harrop

  • A Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial of a Recombinant Rho Protein Antagonist in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

    Michael G. Fehlings;Nicholas Theodore;James Harrop;Gilles Maurais

  • The Aging of the Global Population: The Changing Epidemiology of Disease and Spinal Disorders.

    Michael G. Fehlings;Lindsay Tetreault;Anick Nater;Ted Choma

  • Primary and secondary osteoporosis' incidence of subsequent vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty.

    James S Harrop;Bronco Prpa;Mary Kay Reinhardt;Isador Lieberman

  • A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Introduction, Rationale, and Scope:

    Michael G. Fehlings;Michael G. Fehlings;Lindsay A. Tetreault;Lindsay A. Tetreault;Jefferson R. Wilson;Jefferson R. Wilson;Brian K. Kwon

  • Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma

    Joon Y. Lee;Alexander R. Vaccaro;Moe R. Lim;F.C. Öner

  • Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review.

    Sanjay Yadla;Mitchell G Maltenfort;John K Ratliff;James S Harrop

  • Therapeutic modalities for the management of cerebral vasospasm: timing of endovascular options.

    Robert H. Rosenwasser;Rocco A. Armonda;Jeffrey E. Thomas;Ronald P. Benitez

  • Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    MirHojjat Khorasanizadeh;Mahmoud Yousefifard;Mahsa Eskian;Yi Lu

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander R. Vaccaro
Alexander R. Vaccaro Thomas Jefferson University
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Ashwini Sharan
Ashwini Sharan Thomas Jefferson University
Todd J. Albert
Todd J. Albert Hospital for Special Surgery
Alan S. Hilibrand
Alan S. Hilibrand Thomas Jefferson University
Brian K. Kwon
Brian K. Kwon University of British Columbia
Christopher M. Bono
Christopher M. Bono Harvard University
Marcel F. Dvorak
Marcel F. Dvorak University of British Columbia
Paul A. Anderson
Paul A. Anderson University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in the field of medicine but seeking flexible education options or alternative career paths, there are several online degrees worth considering. These programs can provide a strong foundation for healthcare careers, often at a lower cost and with greater flexibility than traditional routes.

Advanced nursing professionals can benefit from best dnp programs online, which offer high-quality doctoral-level nursing education that can be completed remotely. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists may consider a 3-year online pharmd program as an accelerated and convenient path to a pharmacy career.

Healthcare technology and administration are also increasingly important. A health information technology online degree equips you with skills in data management, patient privacy, and digital health systems. For those looking to enter the administrative side of healthcare quickly, a medical billing and coding certification online can lead to in-demand roles in medical offices and hospitals.

With these varied online programs, students can pursue meaningful, rewarding careers in medicine and allied health—all while balancing study with existing commitments.

Best Scientists Citing James S. Harrop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles