World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17022 16004 8537 7893 791 26072

Daniel M. Sciubba publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel M. Sciubba between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel M. Sciubba published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 39.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 115 publications in 2021. 104 of the 1,021 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 115. Peak 115 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 38 publications 2009: 40 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 63 publications 2016: 90 publications 2017: 79 publications 2018: 77 publications 2019: 91 publications 2020: 75 publications 2021: 115 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 69 publications
2000 2025

1,021 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel M. Sciubba: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 8
2006 9
2007 19
2008 38
2009 40
2010 22
2011 19
2012 20
2013 16
2014 38
2015 63
2016 90
2017 79
2018 77
2019 91
2020 75
2021 115
2022 62
2023 34
2024 35
2025 69
Total 1,021
Download as CSV

Daniel M. Sciubba publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Sciubba sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 791 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 791
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel M. Sciubba D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Sciubba sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel M. Sciubba is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with specialization in the subfields of Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Rheumatology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Management of metastatic bone disease
  • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
  • Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Sciubba has published frequently in several scientific journals, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • The Spine Journal
  • World Neurosurgery
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
  • Global Spine Journal
  • Neurosurgery

Recent papers include:

  • Vertebral bone quality score predicts fragility fractures independently of bone mineral density, 2020, The Spine Journal
  • Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery, 2020, Global Spine Journal
  • Clinical Accuracy, Technical Precision, and Workflow of the First in Human Use of an Augmented-Reality Head-Mounted Display Stereotactic Navigation System for Spine Surgery, 2020, Operative Neurosurgery
  • Assessing underlying bone quality in spine surgery patients: a narrative review of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and alternatives, 2020, The Spine Journal
  • Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws, 2021, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine

Frequent co-authors include Zach Pennington, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Daniel Lubelski, and Jeff Ehresman. Their collaborations encompass numerous publications contributing to the fields of spine surgery and related medical research topics.

Best Publications

  • A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group.

    Charles G. Fisher;Christian P. Dipaola;Timothy C. Ryken;Mark H. Bilsky

  • Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score: An Analysis of Reliability and Validity From the Spine Oncology Study Group

    Daryl R. Fourney;Evan M. Frangou;Timothy C. Ryken;Christian P. DiPaola

  • Detection of tumor-derived DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with primary tumors of the brain and spinal cord

    Yuxuan Wang;Simeon Springer;Ming Zhang;K. Wyatt McMahon

  • Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. A review.

    Daniel M. Sciubba;Rory J. Petteys;Mark B. Dekutoski;Charles G. Fisher

  • Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal.

    Matthew J. McGirt;Giannina L. Garcés Ambrossi;Ghazala Datoo;Daniel M. Sciubba

  • Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws.

    Scott L. Parker;Matthew J. McGirt;S. Harrison Farber;Anubhav G. Amin

  • Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease

    Daniel M. Sciubba;Ziya L. Gokaslan

  • Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessment With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

    Justin S. Smith;Virginie Lafage;Christopher I. Shaffrey;Frank Schwab

  • Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis.

    Giannina L.Garcés Ambrossi;Matthew J. McGirt;Daniel M. Sciubba;Timothy F. Witham

  • Factors associated with progression-free survival and long-term neurological outcome after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: analysis of 101 consecutive cases: Clinical article

    Giannina L. Garcés-Ambrossi;Matthew J. McGirt;Vivek A. Mehta;Daniel M. Sciubba

  • Long-term clinical outcomes following en bloc resections for sacral chordomas and chondrosarcomas: a series of twenty consecutive patients.

    Patrick C. Hsieh;Risheng Xu;Daniel M. Sciubba;Matthew J. McGirt

  • Endoscopic image-guided odontoidectomy for decompression of basilar invagination via a standard anterior cervical approach. Technical note.

    Jean Paul Wolinsky;Daniel M. Sciubba;Ian Suk;Ziya L. Gokaslan

  • Short-term progressive spinal deformity following laminoplasty versus laminectomy for resection of intradural spinal tumors: analysis of 238 patients.

    Matthew J. McGirt;Giannina L. Garcés-Ambrossi;Scott L. Parker;Daniel M. Sciubba

  • Chordoma of the Spinal Column

    Daniel M. Sciubba;John H. Chi;Laurence D. Rhines;Ziya L. Gokaslan

  • Accuracy of free-hand placement of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much of a difference does surgeon experience make?

    Amer F. Samdani;Ashish Ranade;Daniel M. Sciubba;Patrick J. Cahill

  • Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases: Clinical article

    Kaisorn L. Chaichana;Mohamad Bydon;David R. Santiago-Dieppa;Lee Hwang

  • An assessment of frailty as a tool for risk stratification in adult spinal deformity surgery

    Emily K. Miller;Brian J. Neuman;Amit Jain;Alan H. Daniels

  • Effect of antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters in decreasing the incidence of shunt infection in the treatment of hydrocephalus.

    Daniel M. Sciubba;R. Morgan Stuart;Matthew J. McGirt;Graeme F. Woodworth

  • The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials

    Hormuzdiyar H. Dasenbrock;Stephen P. Juraschek;Lonni R. Schultz;Timothy F. Witham

  • A Comprehensive Review of Complication Rates After Surgery for Adult Deformity: A Reference for Informed Consent.

    Daniel M. Sciubba;Alp Yurter;Justin S. Smith;Michael P. Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Ziya L. Gokaslan
Ziya L. Gokaslan Brown University
Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames University of California, San Francisco
Virginie Lafage
Virginie Lafage Lenox Hill Hospital
Frank J. Schwab
Frank J. Schwab Hospital for Special Surgery
Justin S. Smith
Justin S. Smith University of Virginia
Charles G. Fisher
Charles G. Fisher University of British Columbia
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Han Jo Kim
Han Jo Kim Hospital for Special Surgery
Arjun Sahgal
Arjun Sahgal Sunnybrook Health Science Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Medicine and healthcare but searching for flexible or alternative avenues, a range of online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers. Fast-track options like the 6 month lpn program allow students to quickly earn their Licensed Practical Nurse credential and start gaining hands-on experience in the field.

For nurses aiming to specialize in mental health, pursuing online psych np programs can provide advanced knowledge and expanded scope of practice, with the added benefit of remote study.

Not everyone interested in healthcare wants a direct clinical role. An affordable healthcare administration degree online is ideal for those who want to manage hospitals, clinics, or healthcare systems.

For more advanced leadership opportunities, a Master’s in Healthcare Administration can be earned at reduced cost through the cheapest mha online programs, preparing graduates for high-level roles in the rapidly evolving healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Sciubba

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles