World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10140 9516 5217 4818 788 30134

Jeffrey C. Wang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey C. Wang between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey C. Wang published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 17 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2017. 23 of the 869 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2017. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 38 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 35 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 81 publications 2018: 47 publications 2019: 51 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 60 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 1 publication
1976 2026

869 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey C. Wang: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 3
1998 3
1999 7
2000 6
2001 10
2002 13
2003 22
2004 15
2005 38
2006 13
2007 28
2008 35
2009 19
2010 31
2011 23
2012 29
2013 35
2014 45
2015 39
2016 42
2017 81
2018 47
2019 51
2020 52
2021 60
2022 25
2023 27
2024 36
2025 22
2026 1
Total 869
Download as CSV

Jeffrey C. Wang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 788 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 788
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey C. Wang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey C. Wang is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Surgery and related subfields.

Their scholarly contributions include a substantial number of publications in the subfields of Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Key research topics covered by their work include:

  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Spinal Hematomas and Complications
  • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment

Their recent publications include:

  • "Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery", 2020, Global Spine Journal
  • "COVID-19: Review of a 21st Century Pandemic from Etiology to Neuro-psychiatric Implications", 2020, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • "Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons", 2020, Journal of Spine Surgery
  • "Demographic, clinical, and operative risk factors associated with postoperative adjacent segment disease in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis", 2021, The Spine Journal
  • "MMR Vaccination: A Potential Strategy to Reduce Severity and Mortality of COVID-19 Illness", 2020, The American Journal of Medicine

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Jeffrey C. Wang are:

  • Zorica Buser (83 co-authored papers)
  • Jens R. Chapman (43 co-authored papers)
  • Raymond J. Hah (42 co-authored papers)
  • Karsten Wiechert (42 co-authored papers)
  • Andy Ton (39 co-authored papers)

Their body of work has been published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • Global Spine Journal (83 publications)
  • The Spine Journal (29 publications)
  • European Spine Journal (18 publications)
  • Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication (8 publications)
  • Neurospine (8 publications)

Best Publications

  • Replication-Competent Noninduced Proviruses in the Latent Reservoir Increase Barrier to HIV-1 Cure

    Ya Chi Ho;Liang Shan;Nina N. Hosmane;Jeffrey Wang

  • Adjacent Segment Degeneration in the Lumbar Spine

    Gary Ghiselli;Jeffrey C. Wang;Nitin N. Bhatia;Wellington K. Hsu

  • Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

    Jeffrey C. Wang;Paul W. McDonough;Linda E. A. Kanim;Kevin K. Endow

  • A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression

    Michael G. Fehlings;Michael G. Fehlings;Lindsay A. Tetreault;Lindsay A. Tetreault;K. Daniel Riew;James W. Middleton

  • Dural Tears Secondary to Operations on the Lumbar Spine. Management and Results After a Two-Year-Minimum Follow-up of Eighty-eight Patients*

    Jeffrey Wang;Henry Bohlman;K. Riew

  • Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States.

    Scott R. Montgomery;Stephanie S. Ngo;Taylor Hobson;Shawn Nguyen

  • Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery.

    Alexander R. Vaccaro;Kazuhiro Chiba;John G. Heller;Tushar Ch. Patel

  • Osteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion model.

    Brett Peterson;Peter G Whang;Roberto Iglesias;Jeff C Wang

  • Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Point of view

    Jeffrey C. Wang;Paul W. Mcdonough;Linda E. A. Kanim;Kevin K. Endow

  • The effect of cervical plating on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

    Jeffrey C. Wang;Paul W. McDonough;Kevin Endow;Linda E. A. Kanim

  • Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review.

    Thomas E. Mroz;Jeffrey C. Wang;Robin Hashimoto;Daniel C. Norvell

  • Worldwide Survey on the Use of Navigation in Spine Surgery

    Roger Härtl;Khai Sing Lam;Jeffrey Wang;Andreas Korge

  • Laminoplasty implants devices

    William B. Null;Robert W. Weakley;Gregory C. Marik;John G. Heller

  • Effect of regional gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-2-producing bone marrow cells on spinal fusion in rats.

    Jeffrey C. Wang;Linda E.A. Kanim;Stephen Yoo;Patricia A. Campbell

  • Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.

    John DeVine;Daniel C. Norvell;Erika Ecker;Daryl R. Fourney

  • Novel insights into the genetics, biochemistry, and immunocytochemistry of the 30-kilodalton major extracellular protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

    G Harth;B Y Lee;J Wang;D L Clemens

  • Graft migration or displacement after multilevel cervical corpectomy and strut grafting.

    Jeffrey C. Wang;Robert A. Hart;Sanford E. Emery;Henry H. Bohlman

  • Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States.

    William C. Pannell;David D. Savin;Trevor P. Scott;Jeffrey C. Wang

  • The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine

    Yuichiro Morishita;Masatoshi Naito;Henry Hymanson;Masashi Miyazaki

  • A comparison of commercially available demineralized bone matrix for spinal fusion

    Jeffrey C. Wang;A. Alanay;Davies Mark;Linda E. A. Kanim

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Edward C. Benzel
Edward C. Benzel Cleveland Clinic
Alexander R. Vaccaro
Alexander R. Vaccaro Thomas Jefferson University
Jay R. Lieberman
Jay R. Lieberman University of Southern California
Alan S. Hilibrand
Alan S. Hilibrand Thomas Jefferson University
James S. Harrop
James S. Harrop Thomas Jefferson University
Wei-Chiang Shen
Wei-Chiang Shen National Taiwan University
Vijay K. Goel
Vijay K. Goel University of Toledo
Praveen V. Mummaneni
Praveen V. Mummaneni University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to many rewarding healthcare careers. For those eager to start working quickly, a fast lpn program enables students to become licensed practical nurses in less time than traditional programs. This route is perfect if you want to gain hands-on experience and enter the workforce sooner.

Mental health is another growing field. Fast-track options like the fast track mental health nursing programs allow nurses to specialize as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, increasing their expertise and career options.

Interested in the management side of healthcare? Earning a bachelors in healthcare administration can launch your career in hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations. For those seeking advancement, the cheapest online mha degrees provide a flexible, cost-effective path to leadership and executive roles.

Whether you aim to work directly with patients or pursue healthcare leadership, online degrees offer diverse and accessible pathways tailored to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey C. Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles