World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
53758
World Ranking
5277
National Ranking
2850

David S. Liebeskind publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Liebeskind sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,102 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David S. Liebeskind D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Liebeskind sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David S. Liebeskind is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Medicine, with a significant number of publications focused on Epidemiology, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Internal Medicine.

The scientist's work extensively covers a range of topics, including:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management

Liebeskind has contributed to frequent co-authorship collaborations with other researchers, most notably with:

  • Jeffrey L. Saver
  • Raul G. Nogueira
  • Thanh N. Nguyen
  • Osama O. Zaidat
  • Diogo C Haussen

Their publications are often found in specialized journals focused on stroke and neurovascular research. The most common publication venues include:

  • Stroke
  • Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Liebeskind include:

  • Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Trial of Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Thrombectomy for Distal, Medium Vessel Occlusions, 2020, Stroke
  • Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Stroke Beyond 6 h from Time Last Known Well (AURORA): a Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis, 2021, The Lancet
  • Thrombectomy Alone Versus Intravenous Alteplase Plus Thrombectomy in Patients with Stroke: An Open-Label, Blinded-Outcome, Randomised Non-Inferiority Trial, 2022, The Lancet

In addition to articles, Liebeskind has contributed to book literature, including a publication with Frontiers Media titled Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: Epidemiology, Imaging, Treatment and Prognosis released in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.

    Raul G. Nogueira;Ashutosh P. Jadhav;Diogo C. Haussen;Alain Bonafe

  • Recommendations on Angiographic Revascularization Grading Standards for Acute Ischemic Stroke A Consensus Statement

    Osama O. Zaidat;Albert J. Yoo;Pooja Khatri;Thomas A. Tomsick

  • Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Final Results of the Multi MERCI Trial

    Wade S. Smith;Gene Sung;Jeffrey Saver;Ronald Budzik

  • Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial

    Raul G Nogueira;Helmi L Lutsep;Rishi Gupta;Tudor G Jovin

  • DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study

    Götz Thomalla;Bastian Cheng;Martin Ebinger;Qing Hao

  • Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Oh Young Bang;Jeffrey L. Saver;Suk Jae Kim;Gyeong-Moon Kim

  • Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target

    Ashfaq Shuaib;Ken Butcher;Askar A Mohammad;Maher Saqqur

  • Treatment-responsive limbic encephalitis identified by neuropil antibodies: MRI and PET correlates

    Beau M. Ances;Roberta Vitaliani;Robert A. Taylor;Robert A. Taylor;David S. Liebeskind;David S. Liebeskind

  • CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke.

    David S. Liebeskind;Nerses Sanossian;William H. Yong;Sidney Starkman

  • Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

    Xinfeng Liu;Xinfeng Liu;Qiliang Dai;Ruidong Ye;Wenjie Zi;Wenjie Zi

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detection of Microbleeds Before Thrombolysis An Emerging Application

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Jeffrey L. Saver;J. Pablo Villablanca;Gary Duckwiler

  • Time to angiographic reperfusion and clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an analysis of data from the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III) phase 3 trial

    Pooja Khatri;Sharon D Yeatts;Mikael Mazighi;Joseph P Broderick

  • Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke

    Oh Young Bang;Jeffrey L Saver;Brian H Buck;Jeffry R Alger

  • Analysis of Thrombi Retrieved From Cerebral Arteries of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Victor J. Marder;Dennis J. Chute;Sidney Starkman;Anna M. Abolian

  • Prehospital Use of Magnesium Sulfate as Neuroprotection in Acute Stroke

    Jeffrey L Saver;Sidney Starkman;Marc Eckstein;Marc Eckstein;Samuel J Stratton

  • Utility of the NIH Stroke Scale as a Predictor of Hospital Disposition

    Daniel Schlegel;Stephen J. Kolb;Jean M. Luciano;Jennifer M. Tovar

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II

    Max Wintermark;Gregory W. Albers;Andrei V. Alexandrov;Jeffry R. Alger

  • Predictors of Good Clinical Outcomes, Mortality, and Successful Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy Pooled Analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI Trials

    Raul G. Nogueira;David S. Liebeskind;Gene Sung;Gary Duckwiler

  • Collaterals dramatically alter stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerosis.

    David S. Liebeskind;George A. Cotsonis;Jeffrey L. Saver;Michael J. Lynn

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Reza Jahan
Reza Jahan University of California, Los Angeles
Gary Duckwiler
Gary Duckwiler University of California, Los Angeles
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Bruce Ovbiagele
Bruce Ovbiagele University of California, San Francisco
Paul M. Vespa
Paul M. Vespa University of California, Los Angeles
Fernando Vinuela
Fernando Vinuela University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffry R. Alger
Jeffry R. Alger University of California, Los Angeles
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but not ready to commit to medical school, there are diverse online options to start or advance your career. Many students choose to pursue nursing degrees, as these roles offer strong job security, competitive pay, and the chance to make a real impact in patient care.

For those seeking to become advanced practitioners, several online nurse practitioner programs allow you to gain specialized clinical knowledge wherever you are. Entry-level students can get started with highly accessible online nursing school options, making it easier to balance education with other life responsibilities.

If you're already a registered nurse, pursuing one of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs can help you qualify for higher-level roles and improve your earning potential. For those passionate about research or academia, consider exploring online nursing phd programs to become a leader in healthcare innovation.

Best Scientists Citing David S. Liebeskind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles