World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9049 8493 4665 4314 822 87419

Bruce Ovbiagele publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bruce Ovbiagele between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bruce Ovbiagele published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 32.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 80 publications in 2017. 7 of the 750 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 80. Peak 80 publications in 2017. 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 45 publications 2011: 55 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 47 publications 2016: 48 publications 2017: 80 publications 2018: 66 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 47 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
2003 2025

750 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bruce Ovbiagele: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 4
2004 7
2005 19
2006 30
2007 17
2008 27
2009 28
2010 45
2011 55
2012 39
2013 39
2014 41
2015 47
2016 48
2017 80
2018 66
2019 52
2020 47
2021 47
2022 2
2023 3
2024 2
2025 5
Total 750
Download as CSV

Bruce Ovbiagele publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Ovbiagele sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 821–840 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 822 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186 822
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bruce Ovbiagele D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Ovbiagele sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Bruce Ovbiagele is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with a focus on epidemiology, rehabilitation, gender studies, public health, environmental and occupational health, and emergency medical services.

The scientist's primary research topics include acute ischemic stroke management, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, diversity and career in medicine, global health workforce issues, health disparities and outcomes, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, and innovations in medical education.

Ovbiagele has contributed to several recent publications, reflecting their active engagement in stroke-related health disparities, leadership in neurology, and public health research. Notable papers include:

  • Strategies to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Stroke Preparedness, Care, Recovery, and Risk Factor Control: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2023, Stroke
  • Historical Redlining, Social Determinants of Health, and Stroke Prevalence in Communities in New York City, 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • Diversity in Neurology Leadership: Nuances and Nudges, 2021, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Health Disparities Research Curricula and Training Development, 2023, Neurology
  • Factors Associated with Frequency of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Selected Sub-Saharan African Populations: Evidence From the Cardiovascular H3Africa Innovation Resource Project, 2024, International Journal of Epidemiology

The venues where Ovbiagele frequently publishes include Stroke, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, JAMA Network Open, Neurology, and the International Journal of Epidemiology.

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts have included:

  • Charles Esenwa
  • Fred Stephen Sarfo
  • Carolyn Jenkins
  • Mayowa Owolabi
  • Salvador Cruz-Flores

Ovbiagele has been recognized as a Member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Paul K. Whelton;Robert M. Carey;Wilbert S. Aronow;Donald E. Casey

  • Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Walter N. Kernan;Bruce Ovbiagele;Henry R. Black;Dawn M. Bravata

  • Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    William J. Powers;Alejandro A. Rabinstein;Teri Ackerson;Opeolu M. Adeoye

  • Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

    William J. Powers;Alejandro A. Rabinstein;Teri Ackerson;Opeolu M. Adeoye

  • 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

    William J. Powers;Colin P. Derdeyn;José Biller;Christopher S. Coffey

  • Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

    Karen L. Furie;Scott E. Kasner;Robert J. Adams;Gregory W. Albers

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

    Paul K. Whelton;Robert M. Carey;Wilbert S. Aronow;Donald E. Casey

  • Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Chelsea S. Kidwell;Julio A. Chalela;Jeffrey L. Saver;Sidney Starkman

  • Forecasting the Future of Stroke in the United States A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association

    Bruce Ovbiagele;Larry B. Goldstein;Randall T. Higashida;Virginia J. Howard

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary

    Paul K. Whelton;Robert M. Carey;Wilbert S. Aronow;Donald E. Casey

  • A Quantitative Study

    Bruce Ovbiagele;Chelsea S. Kidwell;Jeffrey L. Saver

  • Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Oh Young Bang;Jeffrey L. Saver;Suk Jae Kim;Gyeong-Moon Kim

  • Diabetes and Stroke: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Pharmaceuticals and Outcomes

    Rong Chen;Bruce Ovbiagele;Wuwei Feng

  • Poststroke Depression: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Amytis Towfighi;Bruce Ovbiagele;Nada El Husseini;Maree L. Hackett

  • Low glomerular filtration rate and risk of stroke: meta-analysis.

    Meng Lee;Jeffrey L. Saver;Kuo Hsuan Chang;Hung Wei Liao

  • CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke.

    David S. Liebeskind;Nerses Sanossian;William H. Yong;Sidney Starkman

  • Stroke Epidemiology: Advancing Our Understanding of Disease Mechanism and Therapy

    Bruce Ovbiagele;Mai N. Nguyen-Huynh

  • Elevated red blood cell distribution width predicts mortality in persons with known stroke

    Chizobam Ani;Bruce Ovbiagele

  • Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Care: The American Experience: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Salvador Cruz-Flores;Alejandro Rabinstein;Jose Biller;Mitchell S.V. Elkind

  • 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    William J. Powers;Alejandro A. Rabinstein;Teri Ackerson;O.M. Adevoe

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Mayowa O. Owolabi
Mayowa O. Owolabi University of Ibadan
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Chelsea S. Kidwell
Chelsea S. Kidwell University of Arizona
Oh Young Bang
Oh Young Bang Samsung Medical Center
Daniel T. Lackland
Daniel T. Lackland Medical University of South Carolina
Gary Duckwiler
Gary Duckwiler University of California, Los Angeles
Reza Jahan
Reza Jahan University of California, Los Angeles
S. Claiborne Johnston
S. Claiborne Johnston The University of Texas at Austin
Fernando Vinuela
Fernando Vinuela University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering medicine in the USA opens up a spectrum of related healthcare degrees and career options—many of which can be pursued online. These programs are ideal for those looking for flexible, accessible pathways into the healthcare field, or for current professionals seeking advancement.

For those interested in direct patient care, there are nursing schools that don't require TEAS, making it easier to start your journey without additional exam barriers. Those aiming for leadership roles may prefer the best online healthcare administration degree programs, which prepare graduates for management positions in hospitals and other healthcare settings.

Nurses can further specialize with ADN to FNP programs, allowing registered nurses to bridge towards advanced practice and become family nurse practitioners. Nutrition enthusiasts can consider pursuing an online dietitian degree, opening doors to careers in wellness and dietetics.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities and requirements, making it vital to explore the right fit for your academic and career goals in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce Ovbiagele

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles