World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonio Cepeda-Benito

Antonio Cepeda-Benito

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10822 10133 5661 5171 86 5313

Antonio Cepeda-Benito publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonio Cepeda-Benito between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonio Cepeda-Benito published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2017. 6 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2017. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1992 2025

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonio Cepeda-Benito: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 6
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 6
2005 7
2006 4
2007 4
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 1
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
2017 14
2018 8
2019 4
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
2023 5
2024 1
2025 5
Total 102
Download as CSV

Antonio Cepeda-Benito publications per year - data summary

  • Antonio Cepeda-Benito, a Psychology scholar from University of Vermont, has 102 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995, 1997, 1999, 2002 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 34 years in the span carries no publications at all (2015).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.1 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 13 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 26 publications (2.2 per year); 2004-2015: 35 publications (2.9 per year); 2016-2025: 41 publications (4.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Antonio Cepeda-Benito publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Cepeda-Benito sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Antonio Cepeda-Benito publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Antonio Cepeda-Benito, a Psychology scholar from University of Vermont, records 86 publications - the 11th percentile of the discipline.
  • 11% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Antonio Cepeda-Benito, and about 89% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Antonio Cepeda-Benito ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Antonio Cepeda-Benito D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Cepeda-Benito sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Antonio Cepeda-Benito D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Antonio Cepeda-Benito, a Psychology scholar from University of Vermont, records 32 D-Index - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Antonio Cepeda-Benito, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Antonio Cepeda-Benito ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Antonio Cepeda-Benito is affiliated with the University of Vermont in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, marketing, physiology, and sociology and political science.

Their research topics cover a range of areas, notably eating disorders and behaviors, COVID-19 and mental health, mindfulness and compassion interventions, smoking behavior and cessation, behavioral health and interventions, as well as anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Antonio Cepeda-Benito has published research in several journals and venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Current Pharmaceutical Design
  • The Psychological Record

Notable recent papers include:

  • Psychological inflexibility and mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain: A longitudinal study, 2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • Food addiction correlates with emotional and craving reactivity to industrially prepared (ultra-processed) and home-cooked (processed) foods but not unprocessed or minimally processed foods, 2023, Food Quality and Preference
  • Nicotine Effects, Body Weight Concerns and Smoking: A Literature Review, 2020, Current Pharmaceutical Design
  • Comparative efficacy of remotely delivered mindfulness-based eating awareness training versus behavioral-weight loss counseling during COVID-19, 2023, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Online Administration of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: The Web-IRAP, 2023, The Psychological Record

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Antonio Cepeda-Benito include:

  • Carla Ugarte
  • Mónica Hernández López
  • Miguel Rodríguez-Valverde
  • Silvia Moreno-Domínguez
  • Thomas Geist

Their body of work contributes to the understanding of psychological and behavioral health issues, with a particular emphasis on eating disorders, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, and interventions based on mindfulness and behavioral change strategies.

Best Publications

  • Self-Concealment, Avoidance of Psychological Services, and Perceived Likelihood of Seeking Professional Help.

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Paul Short

  • The development and validation of the state and trait food-cravings questionnaires

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;David H. Gleaves;Tara L. Williams;Stephen A. Erath

  • Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smoking Cessation: Differences between Men and Women.

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Jose T. Reynoso;Stephen Erath

  • Ethnicity as a protective factor against internalization of a thin ideal and body dissatisfaction.

    Cortney S. Warren;David H. Gleaves;David H. Gleaves;Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Maria del Carmen Fernandez

  • The development and validation of Spanish versions of the State and Trait Food Cravings Questionnaires.

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;David H Gleaves;M.Carmen Fernández;Jaime Vila

  • A growing geographic disparity: Rural and urban cigarette smoking trends in the United States.

    N.J. Doogan;M.E. Roberts;M.E. Wewers;C.A. Stanton;C.A. Stanton

  • Relationship of gender and eating disorder symptoms to reported cravings for food: construct validation of state and trait craving questionnaires in Spanish.

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Mari Carmen Fernandez;Silvia Moreno

  • The effects of child sexual abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman (1998).

    Stephanie J. Dallam;David H. Gleaves;Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Joyanna L. Silberg

  • The use of a dual-task procedure for the assessment of cognitive effort associated with cigarette craving

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Stephen T. Tiffany

  • Eating disorder prevention research: a meta-analysis.

    Michelle Cororve Fingeret;Cortney S. Warren;Antonio Cepeda-Benito;David H. Gleaves

  • Tobacco and nicotine delivery product use in a national sample of pregnant women.

    Allison N. Kurti;Ryan Redner;Alexa A. Lopez;Diana R. Keith

  • Clinical Validation of the Trait and State Versions of the Food Craving Questionnaire

    Silvia Moreno;Sonia Rodríguez;Mari Carmen Fernandez;Jeannine Tamez

  • Subjective and physiological reactivity to chocolate images in high and low chocolate cravers

    Sonia Rodríguez;María Carmen Fernández;Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Jaime Vila

  • Food cravings discriminate between anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Implications for "success" versus "failure" in dietary restriction.

    Silvia Moreno;Cortney S. Warren;Sonia Rodríguez;M. Carmen Fernández

  • English and Spanish versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire: Measurement equivalence across ethnicity and clinical status

    Cortney S. Warren;Antonio Cepeda-Benito;David H. Gleaves;Silvia Moreno

  • Smoking Consequences Questionnaire--Spanish.

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Abilio Reig Ferrer

  • Cross-ethnic equivalence of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-21 in European American, African American, and Latino college students.

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;David H. Gleaves

  • Gender Differences in Smoking Cessation.

    Jose Reynoso;Agnes Susabda;Antonio Cepeda-Benito

  • Tobacco Product Harm Perceptions and New Use.

    Maria A. Parker;Andrea C. Villanti;Amanda J. Quisenberry;Cassandra A. Stanton;Cassandra A. Stanton

  • Adaptation of the food-craving questionnaire trait for the assessment of chocolate cravings: validation across British and Spanish women.

    Sonia Rodríguez;Cortney S. Warren;Silvia Moreno;Antonio Cepeda-Benito

  • Smoking prevalence and trends among a U.S. national sample of women of reproductive age in rural versus urban settings

    Tyler D. Nighbor;Nathan J. Doogan;Megan E. Roberts;Antonio Cepeda-Benito

Frequent Co-Authors

David H. Gleaves
David H. Gleaves University of South Australia
Cassandra A. Stanton
Cassandra A. Stanton Westat (United States)
Stephen T. Higgins
Stephen T. Higgins University of Vermont
Stephen T. Tiffany
Stephen T. Tiffany University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Paul J. Wellman
Paul J. Wellman Texas A&M University
Andrea C. Villanti
Andrea C. Villanti Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Cortney S. Warren
Cortney S. Warren University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Stephen A. Erath
Stephen A. Erath Auburn University
Larry L. Bellinger
Larry L. Bellinger Texas A&M University
Douglas K. Snyder
Douglas K. Snyder Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, especially in the mental health field. With the growing demand for licensed therapists across the United States, many students are exploring online psychology programs that offer flexible and accessible education options.

If you are considering this path, it's important to understand the licensure requirements in the state where you wish to practice. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Denver requires completing a graduate degree, supervised clinical hours, and passing licensing exams. Similarly, the process of becoming a licensed therapist in Detroit includes state-specific education and training requirements tailored to Michigan’s regulations.

The steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Durham focus on North Carolina’s credentialing process, while those interested in becoming a licensed therapist in El Paso should review Texas’s particular licensure standards. These differences highlight the importance of choosing an online degree program that aligns with your career goals and state requirements.

Whether you want to specialize in clinical mental health counseling, school psychology, or another area, online degrees offer the flexibility to start your journey toward meaningful work supporting others.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Cepeda-Benito

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles