World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cassandra A. Stanton

Cassandra A. Stanton

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
7708
World Ranking
3002
National Ranking
1448

Cassandra A. Stanton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cassandra A. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 130 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Cassandra A. Stanton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cassandra A. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cassandra A. Stanton is affiliated with Westat in the United States and has a primary research focus within the field of Medicine, contributing substantially to related subfields including Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Applied Psychology.

The main topics of their scientific work cover various public health and behavioral areas, with significant attention to Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Nutritional Studies and Diet, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research, and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling.

Their scholarly output includes multiple papers published in well-known journals, reflecting ongoing engagement with tobacco control and public health research. Some recent papers include:

  • "E-cigarette brands and social media influencers on Instagram: a social network analysis" (2022) published in Tobacco Control
  • "Correlates of tobacco product cessation among youth and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1-3 (2013-2016)" (2020) published in Tobacco Control
  • "Role of e-cigarettes and pharmacotherapy during attempts to quit cigarette smoking: The PATH Study 2013-16" (2020) published in PLoS ONE
  • "Longitudinal pathways of exclusive and polytobacco smokeless use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1-3 (2013-2016)" (2020) published in Tobacco Control
  • "Longitudinal transitions of exclusive and polytobacco electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1-3 (2013-2016)" (2020) published in Tobacco Control

Stanton frequently publishes in several academic venues, predominantly in Tobacco Control, with 23 publications, followed by Nicotine & Tobacco Research (14 publications), Addictive Behaviors (5 publications), Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (4 publications), and Respiratory Research (3 publications).

Collaboration is an essential aspect of their research activity, with frequent coauthors including Andrew Hyland, Heather L. Kimmel, Jenny E. Ozga, Kathryn C. Edwards, and Eva Sharma. These collaborations indicate a networked approach to research within areas related to tobacco control, public health, and related behavioral sciences.

Best Publications

  • Parental Smoking and Adolescent Smoking Initiation: An Intergenerational Perspective on Tobacco Control

    Stephen E. Gilman;Richard Rende;Julie Boergers;Julie Boergers;David B. Abrams

  • Comparison of Nicotine and Toxicant Exposure in Users of Electronic Cigarettes and Combustible Cigarettes

    Maciej L. Goniewicz;Danielle M. Smith;Kathryn C. Edwards;Benjamin C. Blount

  • Flavored Tobacco Product Use in Youth and Adults: Findings From the First Wave of the PATH Study (2013-2014).

    Andrea C. Villanti;Amanda L. Johnson;Bridget K. Ambrose;K. Michael Cummings

  • A growing geographic disparity: Rural and urban cigarette smoking trends in the United States.

    N.J. Doogan;M.E. Roberts;M.E. Wewers;C.A. Stanton;C.A. Stanton

  • Differentiating stages of smoking intensity among adolescents: stage-specific psychological and social influences.

    Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson;George Papandonatos;Alessandra Kazura;Cassandra Stanton

  • Electronic cigarette use among US adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013–2014

    Blair N. Coleman;Brian Rostron;Sarah E. Johnson;Bridget K. Ambrose

  • Co-occurrence of tobacco product use, substance use, and mental health problems among youth: Findings from wave 1 (2013–2014) of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study

    Kevin P. Conway;Victoria R. Green;Karin A. Kasza;Marushka L. Silveira

  • A literature review on prevalence of gender differences and intersections with other vulnerabilities to tobacco use in the United States, 2004-2014.

    Stephen T. Higgins;Allison N. Kurti;Ryan Redner;Thomas J. White

  • E-cigarette brands and social media influencers on Instagram: a social network analysis

    Unknown

  • Rural tobacco use across the United States: How rural and urban areas differ, broken down by census regions and divisions.

    Megan E. Roberts;Nathan J. Doogan;Allison N. Kurti;Ryan Redner

  • The association between alcohol, marijuana use, and new and emerging tobacco products in a young adult population.

    Amy Cohn;Andrea Villanti;Amanda Richardson;Amanda Richardson;Jessica M. Rath

  • Transitions in electronic cigarette use among adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves 1 and 2 (2013-2015).

    Blair Coleman;Brian Rostron;Sarah E. Johnson;Alexander Persoskie

  • Tobacco and nicotine delivery product use in a national sample of pregnant women.

    Allison N. Kurti;Ryan Redner;Alexa A. Lopez;Diana R. Keith

  • Motivation and patch treatment for HIV+ smokers: a randomized controlled trial

    Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson;Cassandra A. Stanton;George D. Papandonatos;William G. Shadel

  • Association of Flavored Tobacco Use With Tobacco Initiation and Subsequent Use Among US Youth and Adults, 2013-2015.

    Andrea C. Villanti;Amanda L. Johnson;Allison M. Glasser;Shyanika W. Rose

  • Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Susceptibility to Tobacco Products.

    John P. Pierce;James D. Sargent;Martha M. White;Nicolette Borek

  • Trends in tobacco use among US adults with chronic health conditions: National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2005-2013.

    Cassandra A. Stanton;Cassandra A. Stanton;Diana R. Keith;Diann E. Gaalema;Janice Y. Bunn

  • Association Between Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Progression to Tobacco Use in Youth and Young Adults in the PATH Study.

    John P. Pierce;James D. Sargent;David B. Portnoy;Martha White

  • Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) reliability and validity study: selected reliability and validity estimates

    Roger Tourangeau;Ting Yan;Hanyu Sun;Andrew Hyland

  • Co-occurring risk factors for current cigarette smoking in a U.S. nationally representative sample.

    Stephen T. Higgins;Allison N. Kurti;Ryan Redner;Thomas J. White

  • E-Cigarettes and smoking cessation: Insights and cautions from a secondary analysis of data from a study of online treatment-seeking smokers

    Jennifer L. Pearson;Cassandra A. Stanton;Sarah Cha;Raymond S. Niaura

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond Niaura
Raymond Niaura New York University
Andrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Andrea C. Villanti
Andrea C. Villanti Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Wilson M. Compton
Wilson M. Compton National Institute on Drug Abuse
David B. Abrams
David B. Abrams New York University
Stephen T. Higgins
Stephen T. Higgins University of Vermont
Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson
Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
Antonio Cepeda-Benito
Antonio Cepeda-Benito University of Vermont
George D. Papandonatos
George D. Papandonatos Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA often begins with choosing the right academic pathway. Prospective students are increasingly turning to flexible, affordable, and accredited online degree programs that cater to different lifestyles and educational backgrounds.

For those seeking to fast-track their education, one year masters programs online provide a swift and intensive route to advanced qualifications, helping you enter the workforce or specialize your skills quickly. Similarly, students aiming to complete undergraduate studies at an accelerated pace can explore accelerated online degree options, making it possible to graduate sooner and reduce overall tuition costs.

Those interested in counseling, social work, or behavioral analysis will find pathways that balance affordability with career prospects. The cheapest msw programs online make advanced social work credentials accessible to a wider range of students. Likewise, individuals aiming for a career in behavioral analysis can pursue bcba certification online to qualify for Board Certified Behavior Analyst roles.

Online programs pave the way for diverse careers in education, mental health, research, public policy, and advocacy, making them a smart choice for future leaders in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Cassandra A. Stanton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles