World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
10526
World Ranking
3626
National Ranking
1268

John G. Kie publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John G. Kie sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 101 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John G. Kie D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John G. Kie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

John G. Kie is affiliated with Idaho State University in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on research within unspecified domains, with limited publicly available bibliographic details.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or frequent publication venues linked to their work. Similarly, there is no information on book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main topics commonly associated with their research.

No awards or honors have been documented for John G. Kie. The scope of their research contributions, including publication output and collaborations, remains largely undocumented in accessible academic resources.

While specific details about their research interests and scientific contributions are lacking, their institutional affiliation suggests engagement in academic activities consistent with Idaho State University's research and educational environment.

Best Publications

  • The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology?

    John G. Kie;Jason Matthiopoulos;John R Fieberg;Roger A. Powell

  • Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics

    Juan M. Morales;Paul R. Moorcroft;Jason Matthiopoulos;Jacqueline L. Frair

  • Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research

    Stanley M. Tomkiewicz;Mark R. Fuller;John G. Kie G. Kie;Kirk K. Bates

  • LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY AT DIFFERING SCALES: EFFECTS ON SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MULE DEER

    John G. Kie;R. Terry Bowyer;Matthew C. Nicholson;Brian B. Boroski

  • Habitat selection and survival of mule deer : Tradeoffs associated with migration

    Matthew C. Nicholson;R. Terry Bowyer;John G. Kie

  • TEMPOROSPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF ELK, MULE DEER, AND CATTLE: RESOURCE PARTITIONING AND COMPETITIVE DISPLACEMENT

    Kelley M. Stewart;R. Terry Bowyer;John G. Kie;John G. Kie;Norman J. Cimon

  • Optimal Foraging and Risk of Predation: Effects on Behavior and Social Structure in Ungulates

    John G. Kie

  • Stochastic modelling of animal movement

    Peter E. Smouse;Stefano Focardi;Paul R. Moorcroft;John G. Kie

  • Sexual Segregation in White-Tailed Deer: Density-Dependent Changes in Use of Space, Habitat Selection, and Dietary Niche

    J. G. Kie;R. T. Bowyer

  • Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test.

    Kelley M. Stewart;R. Terry. Bowyer;R. Terry. Bowyer;Brian L. Dick;Bruce K. Johnson

  • Life-History Characteristics of Mule Deer: Effects of Nutrition in a Variable Environment

    Kevin L. Monteith;Vernon C. Bleich;Thomas R. Stephenson;Becky M. Pierce

  • Birth-Site Selection by Alaskan Moose: Maternal Strategies for Coping with a Risky Environment

    R. Terry Bowyer;Victor Van Ballenberghe;John G. Kie;Julie A. K. Maier

  • Elk Distribution and Modeling in Relation to Roads

    Mary M. Rowland;Michael J. Wisdom;Bruce K. Johnson;John G. Kie

  • DAILY AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE BY FEMALE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK AND MULE DEER

    Alan A. Ager;Bruce K. Johnson;John W. Kern;John G. Kie

  • A rule-based ad hoc method for selecting a bandwidth in kernel home-range analyses

    John G Kie

  • Resource Selection and Spatial Separation of Mule Deer and Elk during Spring

    Bruce K. Johnson;John W. Kern;Michael J. Wisdom;Scott L. Findholt

  • Variation in coyote diets associated with season and successional changes in vegetation

    Frederick Knowlton;William F. Andelt;John G. Kie;Kean Cardwell

  • Timing and Synchrony of Parturition in Alaskan Moose: Long-Term Versus Proximal Effects of Climate

    R. T. Bowyer;V. Van Ballenberghe;J. G. Kie

  • Niche partitioning among mule deer, elk, and cattle: Do stable isotopes reflect dietary niche?

    Kelley M. Stewart;R. Terry Bowyer;John Kie;Brian L. Dick

  • Behavior and nutritional condition buffer a large‐bodied endotherm against direct and indirect effects of climate

    Ryan A. Long;R. Terry Bowyer;Warren P. Porter;Paul Mathewson

  • Habitat Selection by Neonatal Black-Tailed Deer: Climate, Forage, or Risk of Predation?

    R. Terry Bowyer;John G. Kie;Victor Van Ballenberghe

Frequent Co-Authors

R. Terry Bowyer
R. Terry Bowyer University of Alaska Fairbanks
Alan A. Ager
Alan A. Ager US Forest Service
Michael J. Wisdom
Michael J. Wisdom US Forest Service
Vernon C. Bleich
Vernon C. Bleich University of Nevada Reno
Kevin L. Monteith
Kevin L. Monteith University of Wyoming
Janet L. Rachlow
Janet L. Rachlow University of Idaho
Haiganoush K. Preisler
Haiganoush K. Preisler US Forest Service
Paul R. Moorcroft
Paul R. Moorcroft Harvard University
David R. Brillinger
David R. Brillinger University of California, Berkeley
Jonathan A. Jenks
Jonathan A. Jenks South Dakota State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a wide range of career opportunities, especially when paired with specialized online degrees. Many students may consider a fast track masters in psychology to quickly gain research and analytical skills that are highly valued in environmental fields.

Those interested in mental health and conservation can benefit from an online masters in clinical mental health counseling. This path allows graduates to support individuals and communities affected by environmental change.

Ecology professionals with a passion for law or criminal investigations may discover rewarding options in highest paying forensic psychology jobs. These roles often involve environmental forensics or working alongside law enforcement on ecological crime cases.

For those interested in child development and environmental education, an online masters child psychology provides the expertise to support young people as they adapt to changing ecosystems.

Combining ecology and these related online degrees can greatly enhance your career options, whether you aim to research, counsel, or educate the next generation about our planet’s future.

Best Scientists Citing John G. Kie

Trending Scientists